These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30697087)

  • 1. An in vitro acoustic analysis and comparison of popular stethoscopes.
    Weiss D; Erie C; Butera J; Copt R; Yeaw G; Harpster M; Hughes J; Salem DN
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2019; 12():41-52. PubMed ID: 30697087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electronic Stethoscope Filtering Mimics the Perceived Sound Characteristics of Acoustic Stethoscope.
    Rennoll V; McLane I; Emmanouilidou D; West J; Elhilali M
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 May; 25(5):1542-1549. PubMed ID: 32870803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic characterization of stethoscopes using auscultation sounds as test signals.
    Nowak LJ; Nowak KM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1940. PubMed ID: 28372089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility of an electronic stethoscope system for monitoring neonatal bowel sounds.
    Dumas J; Hill KM; Adrezin RS; Alba J; Curry R; Campagna E; Fernandes C; Lamba V; Eisenfeld L
    Conn Med; 2013 Sep; 77(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 24156174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and Comparative Performance of a Robust Lung Auscultation System for Noisy Clinical Settings.
    McLane I; Emmanouilidou D; West JE; Elhilali M
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 Jul; 25(7):2583-2594. PubMed ID: 33534721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sound differences between electronic and acoustic stethoscopes.
    Nowak LJ; Nowak KM
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Aug; 17(1):104. PubMed ID: 30075781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7.
    Kalinauskienė E; Razvadauskas H; Morse DJ; Maxey GE; Naudžiūnas A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 30959832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of electronic stethoscopes for cardiac auscultation.
    Pinto C; Pereira D; Ferreira-Coimbra J; Portugues J; Gama V; Coimbra M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():2610-2613. PubMed ID: 29060434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SonicGuard Sensor-A Multichannel Acoustic Sensor for Long-Term Monitoring of Abdominal Sounds Examined through a Qualification Study.
    Mansour Z; Uslar V; Weyhe D; Hollosi D; Strodthoff N
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Mar; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 38544106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency Responses of Conventional and Amplified Stethoscopes for Measuring Heart Sounds.
    Alanazi AA; Atcherson SR; Franklin CA; Bryan MF
    Saudi J Med Med Sci; 2020; 8(2):112-117. PubMed ID: 32587492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical comparison of acoustic and electronic stethoscopes and design of a new electronic stethoscope.
    Grenier MC; Gagnon K; Genest J; Durand J; Durand LG
    Am J Cardiol; 1998 Mar; 81(5):653-6. PubMed ID: 9514471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and reliability of acoustic analysis of respiratory sounds in infants.
    Elphick HE; Lancaster GA; Solis A; Majumdar A; Gupta R; Smyth RL
    Arch Dis Child; 2004 Nov; 89(11):1059-63. PubMed ID: 15499065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the electronic stethoscope (FONODOC) as a cardiac screening tool during the preoperative evaluation of children.
    Ahuja V; Kini P; Nileshwar A
    Indian J Anaesth; 2022 Sep; 66(9):625-630. PubMed ID: 36388445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Radiating Near-Field 24 GHz Radar Stethoscope.
    Aumann HM; Emanetoglu NW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():5121-5124. PubMed ID: 30441493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of conventional and sensor-based electronic stethoscopes in detecting cardiac murmurs of dogs.
    Vörös K; Bonnevie A; Reiczigel J
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2012 Apr; 40(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 22526814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital stethoscopes compared to standard auscultation for detecting abnormal paediatric breath sounds.
    Kevat AC; Kalirajah A; Roseby R
    Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jul; 176(7):989-992. PubMed ID: 28508991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the accuracy of artificial intelligence enabled acoustic analytic technology on breath sounds in children.
    Cheng ZR; Zhang H; Thomas B; Tan YH; Teoh OH; Pugalenthi A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2022 Jan; 46(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 34730469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of auscultation findings using a classic stethoscope (Litmann 2120) and electronically amplified stethoscope (Medmax2)].
    Lukin A; Polić S; Rumboldt Z; Bagatin J; Rakić D; Kuzmanić A
    Lijec Vjesn; 1996; 118(5-6):127-8. PubMed ID: 8965622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An adaptive noise reduction stethoscope for auscultation in high noise environments.
    Patel SB; Callahan TF; Callahan MG; Jones JT; Graber GP; Foster KS; Glifort K; Wodicka GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2483-91. PubMed ID: 9604343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advances in Microsensors and Wearable Bioelectronics for Digital Stethoscopes in Health Monitoring and Disease Diagnosis.
    Lee SH; Kim YS; Yeo WH
    Adv Healthc Mater; 2021 Nov; 10(22):e2101400. PubMed ID: 34486237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.