These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30697648)

  • 1. Lightness/pitch and elevation/pitch crossmodal correspondences are low-level sensory effects.
    Zeljko M; Kritikos A; Grove PM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1609-1623. PubMed ID: 30697648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural basis of the crossmodal correspondence between auditory pitch and visuospatial elevation.
    McCormick K; Lacey S; Stilla R; Nygaard LC; Sathian K
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():19-30. PubMed ID: 29501792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Lightness/Pitch Crossmodal Correspondence Modulates the Rubin Face/Vase Perception.
    Zeljko M; Grove PM; Kritikos A
    Multisens Res; 2021 Jun; ():1-21. PubMed ID: 34139670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interactions Between Auditory Elevation, Auditory Pitch and Visual Elevation During Multisensory Perception.
    Jamal Y; Lacey S; Nygaard L; Sathian K
    Multisens Res; 2017 Jan; 30(3-5):287-306. PubMed ID: 31287081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pitch and Visual Elevation Affects Temporal Ventriloquism.
    Orchard-Mills E; Van der Burg E; Alais D
    Perception; 2016 Apr; 45(4):409-24. PubMed ID: 26655643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pitch-elevation and pitch-size cross-modal correspondences do not affect temporal ventriloquism.
    Uno K; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):1052-1063. PubMed ID: 35217979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visually induced gains in pitch discrimination: Linking audio-visual processing with auditory abilities.
    Møller C; Højlund A; Bærentsen KB; Hansen NC; Skewes JC; Vuust P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):999-1010. PubMed ID: 29473142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audio-visual crossmodal correspondences in domestic dogs (
    Korzeniowska AT; Root-Gutteridge H; Simner J; Reby D
    Biol Lett; 2019 Nov; 15(11):20190564. PubMed ID: 31718513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Synaesthetic interactions across vision and audition.
    Krugliak A; Noppeney U
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 88():65-73. PubMed ID: 26427739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are crossmodal correspondences relative or absolute? Sequential effects on speeded classification.
    Brunetti R; Indraccolo A; Del Gatto C; Spence C; Santangelo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):527-534. PubMed ID: 29116614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-modal interactions in auditory and visual discrimination.
    Marks LE; Ben-Artzi E; Lakatos S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Oct; 50(1-2):125-45. PubMed ID: 14511841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiovisual Crossmodal Correspondence between Bubbles' Size and Pouring Sounds' Pitch in Carbonated Beverages.
    Roque J; Lafraire J; Auvray M
    Foods; 2020 Jul; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 32707765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does crossmodal correspondence modulate the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search?
    Klapetek A; Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1154-67. PubMed ID: 22648604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low is large: spatial location and pitch interact in voice-based body size estimation.
    Pisanski K; Isenstein SGE; Montano KJ; O'Connor JJM; Feinberg DR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1239-1251. PubMed ID: 28229428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Steady state visual evoked potentials reveal a signature of the pitch-size crossmodal association in visual cortex.
    Sciortino P; Kayser C
    Neuroimage; 2023 Jun; 273():120093. PubMed ID: 37028733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the Relative Nature of (Pitch-Based) Crossmodal Correspondences.
    Spence C
    Multisens Res; 2019 Jan; 32(3):235-265. PubMed ID: 31059485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement.
    Van der Stoep N; Spence C; Nijboer TC; Van der Stigchel S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():20-8. PubMed ID: 26436587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of auditory and tactile crossmodal cues in a dual-task visual and auditory scenario.
    Hopkins K; Kass SJ; Blalock LD; Brill JC
    Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 27267493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.