209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30698280)
1. Maternal short-term complications after planned cesarean delivery without medical indication: A registry-based study.
Otkjaer AM; Jørgensen HL; Clausen TD; Krebs L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):905-912. PubMed ID: 30698280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Elective cesarean delivery for term breech.
Krebs L; Langhoff-Roos J
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Apr; 101(4):690-6. PubMed ID: 12681872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term.
Liu S; Liston RM; Joseph KS; Heaman M; Sauve R; Kramer MS;
CMAJ; 2007 Feb; 176(4):455-60. PubMed ID: 17296957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Planned cesarean section vs planned vaginal delivery among women without formal medical indication for planned cesarean section: A retrospective cohort study of maternal short-term complications.
Dahlquist K; Stuart A; Källén K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Sep; 101(9):1026-1032. PubMed ID: 35841162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Planned Mode of Delivery in Women with Advanced Maternal Age.
Lavecchia M; Sabbah M; Abenhaim HA
Matern Child Health J; 2016 Nov; 20(11):2318-2327. PubMed ID: 27473092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey.
Bergholt T; Østberg B; Legarth J; Weber T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Mar; 83(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 14995922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.
Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Planned vaginal delivery and cardiovascular morbidity in pregnant women with heart disease.
Easter SR; Rouse CE; Duarte V; Hynes JS; Singh MN; Landzberg MJ; Valente AM; Economy KE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 222(1):77.e1-77.e11. PubMed ID: 31310750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Maternal Benefits and Risks of Planned Cesarean Delivery compared to Planned Vaginal Delivery].
Korb D
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):109-119. PubMed ID: 31678507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases.
Golfier F; Vaudoyer F; Ecochard R; Champion F; Audra P; Raudrant D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2001 Oct; 98(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 11574129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Birth outcomes following cesarean delivery on maternal request: a population-based cohort study.
Guo Y; Murphy MSQ; Erwin E; Fakhraei R; Corsi DJ; White RR; Harvey ALJ; Gaudet LM; Walker MC; Wen SW; El-Chaâr D
CMAJ; 2021 May; 193(18):E634-E644. PubMed ID: 33941522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population.
Bodner K; Wierrani F; Grünberger W; Bodner-Adler B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1193-8. PubMed ID: 20505947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maternal request cesarean versus planned spontaneous vaginal delivery: maternal morbidity and short term outcomes.
Wax JR
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):247-52. PubMed ID: 17011394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial.
Hannah ME; Hannah WJ; Hodnett ED; Chalmers B; Kung R; Willan A; Amankwah K; Cheng M; Helewa M; Hewson S; Saigal S; Whyte H; Gafni A;
JAMA; 2002 Apr; 287(14):1822-31. PubMed ID: 11939868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mode of delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injury and the risk of long-term anal incontinence.
Jangö H; Langhoff-Roos J; Rosthøj S; Sakse A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 214(6):733.e1-733.e13. PubMed ID: 26721778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kabiri D; Masarwy R; Schachter-Safrai N; Masarwa R; Hirsh Raccah B; Ezra Y; Matok I
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):336-347. PubMed ID: 30465748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maternal outcomes of planned mode of delivery for term breech in nulliparous women.
Caning MM; Rasmussen SC; Krebs L
PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0297971. PubMed ID: 38568924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in China: what are the risks and benefits?
Liu X; Landon MB; Cheng W; Chen Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):817.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25640048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of breech birth by mode of delivery: a population linkage study.
Bin YS; Roberts CL; Ford JB; Nicholl MC
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Oct; 56(5):453-459. PubMed ID: 27339863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
