These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 306989)

  • 1. Comparison of BL-S786 with cephalothin, cefamandole and cefoxitin in vitro and in treatment of experimental infections in mice.
    Goering RV; Sanders CC; Sanders W
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1978 Apr; 31(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 306989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro and in vivo studies with BL-S786, cefoxitin, and cefamandole.
    Shadomy S; Wagner G; Carver M
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Mar; 13(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 400821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro susceptibility of cephalothin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae to cefoxitin and BL-S786.
    Meyer RD
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1977 Apr; 30(4):326-9. PubMed ID: 324961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ["In vitro" activity of cefamandole, cefalotin, cefoxitin and cefuroxim against enterobacteria and Staphylococcus aureus isolated in hospital (author's transl)].
    Thabaut A; Durosoir JL; Saliou P
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1979 Dec; 27(10):649-54. PubMed ID: 395496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro comparison of cefoxitin, cefamandole, cephalexin, and cephalothin.
    Eickhoff TC; Ehret JM
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Jun; 9(6):994-9. PubMed ID: 938029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BL-S786, a new parenteral cephalosporin. I. A collaborative in vitro susceptibility comparison to cephalothin against 5,762 clinical bacterial isolates.
    Jones RN; Fuchs PC; Gavan TL; Gerlach EH; Barry A; Thornsberry C
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1977 Jul; 30(7):576-82. PubMed ID: 893226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-vitro activities of cefamandole and cephalothin against 1,881 clinical isolates. A multi-center study.
    Barry AL; Schoenknect FD; Shadomy S; Sherris JC; Thornsberry C; Washington JA; Kammer RB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1979 Nov; 72(5):858-60. PubMed ID: 506998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emergence of resistance to cefamandole: possible role of cefoxitin-inducible beta-lactamases.
    Sanders CC; Sanders WE
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Jun; 15(6):792-7. PubMed ID: 314270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative activity of two newer cephalosporins, cefoxitin, and cephalothin against selected Enterobacteriaceae and correlation with enzymatic resistance mechanisms.
    Vuye A; Pijck J; Van Landuyt HW
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1979 May; 5(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 314440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Piperacillin (T-1220), a new semisynthetic penicillin: in vitro antimicrobial activity comparison with carbenicillin, ticarcillin, ampicillin, cephalothin, cefamandole and cefoxitin.
    Jones RN; Thornsberry C; Barry AL; Fuchs PC; Gavan TL; Gerlach EH
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1977 Dec; 30(12):1107-14. PubMed ID: 599084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of cefoxitin and cefamandole.
    Adams HG; Stilwell GA; Turck M
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Jun; 9(6):1019-24. PubMed ID: 820241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative in-vitro activity of cefamandole, cefoxitin, cefuroxime and cephalothin.
    Brorson JE; Norrby R
    Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1978; (13):88-93. PubMed ID: 278150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. BL-S786, a new parenteral cephalosporin. II. In vitro antimicrobial activity comparison with six related cephalosporins.
    Jones RN; Thornsberry C; Barry AL; Fuchs PC; Gavin TL; Gerlach EH
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1977 Jul; 30(7):583-92. PubMed ID: 893227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of cefaclor, cefazolin, cefamandole, and cephalothin disks to predict susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus species, and Haemophilus influenzae.
    Barry AL; Jones RN; Thornsberry C
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Nov; 84(5):643-8. PubMed ID: 3877452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antagonism of cefamandole by cefoxitin in routine disk susceptibility tests.
    Sanders CC; Sanders WE
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Apr; 73(4):562-3. PubMed ID: 7369181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cefuroxime, cefamandole, cefoxitin, and cephalothin in vitro susceptibility tests: reassessment of the "class representative" concept, confirmation of disk interpretive criteria, and proposed quality control guidelines.
    Barry AL; Jones RN; Thornsberry C
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Aug; 80(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 6881092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory evaluation of BL-S786, a cephalosporin with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity.
    Leitner F; Misiek M; Pursiano TA; Buck RE; Chisholm DR; DeRegis RG; Tsai YH; Price KE
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Sep; 10(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 984784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity of gentamicin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae to cefamandole and cefoxitin.
    Rosenthal SL; Freundlich LF; Quraishi MA
    Chemotherapy; 1979; 25(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 456076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Susceptibility of cephalothin-resistant gram-negative bacilli to piperacillin, cefuroxime, and other selected antibiotics.
    George WL; Lewis RP; Meyer RD
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Mar; 13(3):484-9. PubMed ID: 122524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in experimental Haemophilus influenzae bacteremia and meningitis in infant rats.
    Whitney RR; McRipley RJ; Gadebusch HH
    Chemotherapy; 1980; 26(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 6965474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.