These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30699159)
1. Validation of the Fitbit Charge 2 compared to the ActiGraph GT3X+ in older adults with knee osteoarthritis in free-living conditions. Collins JE; Yang HY; Trentadue TP; Gong Y; Losina E PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211231. PubMed ID: 30699159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry. Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment. Reid RER; Insogna JA; Carver TE; Comptour AM; Bewski NA; Sciortino C; Andersen RE J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jun; 20(6):578-582. PubMed ID: 27887786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X. Mikkelsen MK; Berg-Beckhoff G; Frederiksen P; Horgan G; O'Driscoll R; Palmeira AL; Scott SE; Stubbs J; Heitmann BL; Larsen SC PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234426. PubMed ID: 32525912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Redenius N; Kim Y; Byun W BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 30732582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validating Fitbit Zip for monitoring physical activity of children in school: a cross-sectional study. Mooses K; Oja M; Reisberg S; Vilo J; Kull M BMC Public Health; 2018 Jul; 18(1):858. PubMed ID: 29996797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of free-living physical activity measurements between ActiGraph GT3X-BT and Fitbit Charge 3 in young people with haemophilia. Matlary RED; Holme PA; Glosli H; Rueegg CS; Grydeland M Haemophilia; 2022 Nov; 28(6):e172-e180. PubMed ID: 35830613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort. Tedesco S; Sica M; Ancillao A; Timmons S; Barton J; O'Flynn B JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jun; 7(6):e13084. PubMed ID: 31219048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comprehensive comparison of Apple Watch and Fitbit monitors in a free-living setting. Bai Y; Tompkins C; Gell N; Dione D; Zhang T; Byun W PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251975. PubMed ID: 34038458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults. Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Validation Study of the Fitbit One in Daily Life Using Different Time Intervals. Middelweerd A; VAN DER Ploeg HP; VAN Halteren A; Twisk JWR; Brug J; Te Velde SJ Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Jun; 49(6):1270-1279. PubMed ID: 28511193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fitbit wear-time and patterns of activity in cancer survivors throughout a physical activity intervention and follow-up: Exploratory analysis from a randomised controlled trial. Hardcastle SJ; Jiménez-Castuera R; Maxwell-Smith C; Bulsara MK; Hince D PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240967. PubMed ID: 33075100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and Reliability of Fitbit Flex for Step Count, Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity and Activity Energy Expenditure. Sushames A; Edwards A; Thompson F; McDermott R; Gebel K PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161224. PubMed ID: 27589592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study. Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions. Dominick GM; Winfree KN; Pohlig RT; Papas MA JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Sep; 4(3):e110. PubMed ID: 27644334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physical activity patterns, adherence to using a wearable activity tracker during a 12-week period and correlation between self-reported function and physical activity in working age individuals with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. Östlind E; Sant'Anna A; Eek F; Stigmar K; Ekvall Hansson E BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 May; 22(1):450. PubMed ID: 33992121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling Clinically Validated Physical Activity Assessments Using Commodity Hardware. Winfree KN; Dominick G IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2018 Mar; 22(2):335-345. PubMed ID: 29505401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population. Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gallagher R Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 23(14):1476-85. PubMed ID: 26907794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of Commercial Activity Trackers in Children With Congenital Heart Disease. Voss C; Gardner RF; Dean PH; Harris KC Can J Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 33(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 28347581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]