177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30699403)
1. An open source autocorrelation-based method for fetal heart rate estimation from one-dimensional Doppler ultrasound.
Valderrama CE; Stroux L; Katebi N; Paljug E; Hall-Clifford R; Rohloff P; Marzbanrad F; Clifford GD
Physiol Meas; 2019 Feb; 40(2):025005. PubMed ID: 30699403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unsupervised hidden semi-Markov model for automatic beat onset detection in 1D Doppler ultrasound.
Katebi N; Marzbanrad F; Stroux L; Valderrama CE; Clifford GD
Physiol Meas; 2020 Sep; 41(8):085007. PubMed ID: 32585651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Robust Approach Assisted by Signal Quality Assessment for Fetal Heart Rate Estimation from Doppler Ultrasound Signal.
Shi X; Niida N; Yamamoto K; Ohtsuki T; Matsui Y; Owada K
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 38139544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel technique for fetal heart rate estimation from Doppler ultrasound signal.
Jezewski J; Roj D; Wrobel J; Horoba K
Biomed Eng Online; 2011 Oct; 10():92. PubMed ID: 21999764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New Method for Beat-to-Beat Fetal Heart Rate Measurement Using Doppler Ultrasound Signal.
Kupka T; Matonia A; Jezewski M; Jezewski J; Horoba K; Wrobel J; Czabanski R; Martinek R
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jul; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 32707863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A study of a fetal heart rate calculation system based on R-R interval.
Zhang Y; Zhang S; Yang L; Yang Y; Li X; Hao D; Xu M; Shao J
Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(S1):187-195. PubMed ID: 32364151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-invasive Fetal ECG Signal Quality Assessment for Multichannel Heart Rate Estimation.
Andreotti F; Graser F; Malberg H; Zaunseder S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 64(12):2793-2802. PubMed ID: 28362581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-invasive Fetal ECG Signal Quality Assessment based on Unsupervised Learning Approach.
Shi X; Yamamoto K; Ohtsuki T; Matsui Y; Owada K
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():1296-1299. PubMed ID: 36086629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robust Fetal Heart Rate Tracking through Fetal Electrocardiography (ECG) and Photoplethysmography (PPG) Fusion
Kasap B; Vali K; Qian W; Saffarpour M; Fowler R; Ghiasi S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surveillance of growth-retarded fetuses with computerized fetal heart rate monitoring combined with Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical and uterine arteries.
Weiner Z; Farmakides G; Schulman H; Lopresti S; Schneider E
J Reprod Med; 1996 Feb; 41(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 8656410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New estimators and guidelines for better use of fetal heart rate estimators with Doppler ultrasound devices.
Voicu I; Ménigot S; Kouamé D; Girault JM
Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():784862. PubMed ID: 24624224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrapartum signal quality with external fetal heart rate monitoring: a two way trial of external Doppler CTG ultrasound and the abdominal fetal electrocardiogram.
Reinhard J; Hayes-Gill BR; Schiermeier S; Hatzmann W; Herrmann E; Heinrich TM; Louwen F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1103-7. PubMed ID: 22714064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is Abdominal Fetal Electrocardiography an Alternative to Doppler Ultrasound for FHR Variability Evaluation?
Jezewski J; Wrobel J; Matonia A; Horoba K; Martinek R; Kupka T; Jezewski M
Front Physiol; 2017; 8():305. PubMed ID: 28559852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Doppler Ultrasound Technology for Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: A Review.
Hamelmann P; Vullings R; Kolen AF; Bergmans JWM; van Laar JOEH; Tortoli P; Mischi M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Feb; 67(2):226-238. PubMed ID: 31562079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of gestational age and time of day in baseline and heart rate variation of fetuses.
Li G; Zhang S; Yang L; Li S; Wang Y; Hao D; Yang Y; Li X; Zhang L; Xu M
Technol Health Care; 2016 Apr; 24 Suppl 2():S471-6. PubMed ID: 27163306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal heart rate monitoring based on independent component analysis.
Najafabadi FS; Zahedi E; Mohd Ali MA
Comput Biol Med; 2006 Mar; 36(3):241-52. PubMed ID: 16446158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-invasive acquisition of fetal ECG from the maternal xyphoid process: a feasibility study in pregnant sheep and a call for open data sets.
Shen C; Frasch MG; Wu HT; Herry CL; Cao M; Desrochers A; Fecteau G; Burns P
Physiol Meas; 2018 Mar; 39(3):035005. PubMed ID: 29369821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal motion estimation from noninvasive cardiac signal recordings.
Biglari H; Sameni R
Physiol Meas; 2016 Nov; 37(11):2003-2023. PubMed ID: 27775930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Studies on the cardiotocograms recorded by a new system with 1 MHz ultrasound and autocorrelation heart rate meter].
Sawazumi K; Nagata N; Irie T; Maeda K
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 May; 40(5):555-60. PubMed ID: 3290362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic segmentation and linear prediction for maternal ECG removal in antenatal abdominal recordings.
Vullings R; Peters CH; Sluijter RJ; Mischi M; Oei SG; Bergmans JW
Physiol Meas; 2009 Mar; 30(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 19223679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
