148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30699962)
1. Arsenic Distribution Assessment in a Residential Area Polluted with Mining Residues.
Manjarrez-Domínguez CB; Prieto-Amparán JA; Valles-Aragón MC; Delgado-Caballero MDR; Alarcón-Herrera MT; Nevarez-Rodríguez MC; Vázquez-Quintero G; Berzoza-Gaytan CA
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30699962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighting for soil as pollution in Beijing.
Qiao P; Lei M; Yang S; Yang J; Guo G; Zhou X
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jun; 25(16):15597-15608. PubMed ID: 29572743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial distribution prediction of soil As in a large-scale arsenic slag contaminated site based on an integrated model and multi-source environmental data.
Liu G; Zhou X; Li Q; Shi Y; Guo G; Zhao L; Wang J; Su Y; Zhang C
Environ Pollut; 2020 Dec; 267():115631. PubMed ID: 33254608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the common spatial interpolation methods used to analyze potentially toxic elements surrounding mining regions.
Ding Q; Wang Y; Zhuang D
J Environ Manage; 2018 Apr; 212():23-31. PubMed ID: 29427938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of predicting spatial contaminant distributions at industrial sites using partitioned interpolation method.
Qiao P; Yang S; Wei W; Li P; Cheng Y; Liang S; Lei M; Chen T
Environ Geochem Health; 2021 Jan; 43(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 32696201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of different interpolation methods and sequential Gaussian simulation to estimate volumes of soil contaminated by As, Cr, Cu, PCP and dioxins/furans.
Metahni S; Coudert L; Gloaguen E; Guemiza K; Mercier G; Blais JF
Environ Pollut; 2019 Sep; 252(Pt A):409-419. PubMed ID: 31158669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of common spatial interpolation methods for analyzing pollutant spatial distributions at contaminated sites.
Qiao P; Li P; Cheng Y; Wei W; Yang S; Lei M; Chen T
Environ Geochem Health; 2019 Dec; 41(6):2709-2730. PubMed ID: 31144251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GIS interpolation is key in assessing spatial and temporal bioremediation of groundwater arsenic contamination.
Fischer A; Lee MK; Ojeda AS; Rogers SR
J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 280():111683. PubMed ID: 33246756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrated probabilistic risk assessment in sites contaminated with arsenic and lead by long-term mining liabilities in San Luis Potosi, Mexico.
Fernández-Macías JC; González-Mille DJ; García-Arreola ME; Cruz-Santiago O; Rivero-Pérez NE; Pérez-Vázquez F; Ilizaliturri-Hernández CA
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Jul; 197():110568. PubMed ID: 32283412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Spatial Interpolation Methods and Pollution Assessment of Heavy Metals of Soil in Typical Areas].
Ma HH; Yu T; Yang ZF; Hou QY; Zeng QL; Wang R
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2018 Oct; 39(10):4684-4693. PubMed ID: 30229617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrated approach to assess the environmental impact of mining activities: estimation of the spatial distribution of soil contamination (Panasqueira mining area, Central Portugal).
Candeias C; Ávila PF; Ferreira da Silva E; Teixeira JP
Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Mar; 187(3):135. PubMed ID: 25702148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An integrated health risk assessment approach to the study of mining sites contaminated with arsenic and lead.
Jasso-Pineda Y; Espinosa-Reyes G; González-Mille D; Razo-Soto I; Carrizales L; Torres-Dosal A; Mejia-Saavedra J; Monroy M; Ize AI; Yarto M; Díaz-Barriga F
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jul; 3(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 17695107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of four methods for spatial interpolation of estimated atmospheric nitrogen deposition in South China.
Qu L; Xiao H; Zheng N; Zhang Z; Xu Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jan; 24(3):2578-2588. PubMed ID: 27826827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Spatial distribution prediction of surface soil Pb in a battery contaminated site].
Liu G; Niu JJ; Zhang C; Zhao X; Guo GL
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2014 Dec; 35(12):4712-9. PubMed ID: 25826945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization of spatial prediction and sampling strategy of site contamination based on Thiessen polygon coupling interpolation.
Liu X; Zheng L; Li Z; Liu F; Obin N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jul; 30(32):78959-78972. PubMed ID: 37278892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Importance of the oral arsenic bioaccessibility factor for characterising the risk associated with soil ingestion in a mining-influenced zone.
Martínez-Sánchez MJ; Martínez-López S; Martínez-Martínez LB; Pérez-Sirvent C
J Environ Manage; 2013 Feb; 116():10-7. PubMed ID: 23274587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of Ordinary Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting Methods for Modeling Chromium and Cadmium Soil Pollution in E-Waste Sites in Douala, Cameroon.
Ouabo RE; Sangodoyin AY; Ogundiran MB
J Health Pollut; 2020 Jun; 10(26):200605. PubMed ID: 32509406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Arsenic in the soils of Zimapán, Mexico.
Ongley LK; Sherman L; Armienta A; Concilio A; Salinas CF
Environ Pollut; 2007 Feb; 145(3):793-9. PubMed ID: 16872728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fluvial transport and surface enrichment of arsenic in semi-arid mining regions: examples from the Mojave Desert, California.
Kim CS; Stack DH; Rytuba JJ
J Environ Monit; 2012 Jul; 14(7):1798-813. PubMed ID: 22718027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of land contaminated by past heavy metal mining using geostatistical methods.
Ersoy A; Yunsel TY; Cetin M
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2004 Feb; 46(2):162-75. PubMed ID: 15106666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
