These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30700047)

  • 1. A Group Decision Making Approach Considering Self-confidence Behaviors and Its Application in Environmental Pollution Emergency Management.
    Liu X; Xu Y; Ge Y; Zhang W; Herrera F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30700047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective allocation of resources in water pollution treatment alternatives: a multi-stage gray group decision-making method based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets.
    Wang J; Qian W; Du J; Liu Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(3):3173-3186. PubMed ID: 31838682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. TOPSIS-based consensus model for group decision-making with incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations.
    Liu F; Zhang WG
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2014 Aug; 44(8):1283-94. PubMed ID: 24081882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contingency response decision of network public opinion emergencies based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and preference information of decision makers.
    Fu S; Xiao YZ; Zhou HJ
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):3246. PubMed ID: 35228588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency.
    Herrera-Viedma E; Chiclana F; Herrera F; Alonso S
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2007 Feb; 37(1):176-89. PubMed ID: 17278570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Linguistic Hierarchy Model with Self-Confidence Preference Relations and Its Application in Co-Regulation of Food Safety in China.
    Fan S; Zhang H; Tang H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31416262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Utility Set and Its Application in Selection of Fire Rescue Plans.
    Liao H; Si G; Xu Z; Fujita H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29614019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE multi-criteria group decision-making and most suitable biomedical material selection.
    Kirişci M; Demir I; Şimşek N
    Artif Intell Med; 2022 May; 127():102278. PubMed ID: 35430046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nature Disaster Risk Evaluation with a Group Decision Making Method Based on Incomplete Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations.
    Tang M; Liao H; Li Z; Xu Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29652868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple Group Decision Making for Selecting Emergency Alternatives: A Novel Method Based on the LDWPA Operator and LD-MABAC.
    Liang X; Teng F; Sun Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Apr; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 32344552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prioritizing groundwater remediation policies: a fuzzy compatibility analysis decision aid.
    Nasiri F; Huang G; Fuller N
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 16516373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Induced interval-valued Pythagorean trapezoidal fuzzy aggregation operators based on Einstein operations and their application in group decision making.
    Shakeel M; Abdullah S; Shahzad M; Fahmi A
    J Integr Neurosci; 2018; 17(3-4):633-659. PubMed ID: 30149460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emergency decision-making model of environmental emergencies based on case-based reasoning method.
    Wang D; Wan K; Ma W
    J Environ Manage; 2020 May; 262():110382. PubMed ID: 32250833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Optimization-Based Approach to Social Network Group Decision Making with an Application to Earthquake Shelter-Site Selection.
    Zhang H; Wang F; Tang H; Dong Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jul; 16(15):. PubMed ID: 31370366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A consensus model to manage the non-cooperative behaviors of individuals in uncertain group decision making problems during the COVID-19 outbreak.
    Li X; Liao H; Wen Z
    Appl Soft Comput; 2021 Feb; 99():106879. PubMed ID: 33519328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Additive Consistency and Consensus Approach for Group Decision Making With Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations and Its Application in Failure Criticality Analysis.
    Wang Z; Ran Y; Jin C; Chen Y; Zhang G
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2022 Nov; 52(11):12501-12513. PubMed ID: 34033569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating environmental sustainability: an integration of multiple-criteria decision-making and fuzzy logic.
    Liu KF
    Environ Manage; 2007 May; 39(5):721-36. PubMed ID: 17377731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variable weights theory and its application to multi-attribute group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy numbers on determining decision maker's weights.
    Liu S; Yu W; Liu L; Hu Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212636. PubMed ID: 30840647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Group Decision Framework with Intuitionistic Preference Relations and Its Application to Low Carbon Supplier Selection.
    Tong X; Wang ZJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Sep; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 27657097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The optimal emergency decision-making method with incomplete probabilistic information.
    Fu M; Wang L; Zheng B; Shao H
    Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):23400. PubMed ID: 34862455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.