These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30700565)
21. Effect of peer videorecording feedback CPR training on students' practical CPR skills: a randomized controlled manikin study. Lin L; Ni S; Liu Y; Xue J; Ma B; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Jin X BMC Med Educ; 2022 Jun; 22(1):484. PubMed ID: 35733183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Real-Time Audiovisual Feedback Training Improves Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performance: A Controlled Study. Eshel R; Wacht O; Schwartz D Simul Healthc; 2019 Dec; 14(6):359-365. PubMed ID: 31743309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Feedback: A Comparison of Device-Measured and Self-Assessed Chest Compression Quality. Picard C; Yang BG; Norris C; McIntosh S; Douma MJ J Emerg Nurs; 2021 Mar; 47(2):333-341.e1. PubMed ID: 33308832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of a Real-Time Training Software (Laerdal QCPR®) Compared to Instructor-Based Feedback for High-Quality Chest Compressions Acquisition in Secondary School Students: A Randomized Trial. Cortegiani A; Russotto V; Montalto F; Iozzo P; Meschis R; Pugliesi M; Mariano D; Benenati V; Raineri SM; Gregoretti C; Giarratano A PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169591. PubMed ID: 28056076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. "Booster" training: evaluation of instructor-led bedside cardiopulmonary resuscitation skill training and automated corrective feedback to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation compliance of Pediatric Basic Life Support providers during simulated cardiac arrest. Sutton RM; Niles D; Meaney PA; Aplenc R; French B; Abella BS; Lengetti EL; Berg RA; Helfaer MA; Nadkarni V Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2011 May; 12(3):e116-21. PubMed ID: 20625336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quality of closed chest compression on a manikin in ambulance vehicles and flying helicopters with a real time automated feedback. Havel C; Schreiber W; Trimmel H; Malzer R; Haugk M; Richling N; Riedmüller E; Sterz F; Herkner H Resuscitation; 2010 Jan; 81(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 19926386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quality retention of chest compression after repetitive practices with or without feedback devices: A randomized manikin study. Zhou XL; Wang J; Jin XQ; Zhao Y; Liu RL; Jiang C Am J Emerg Med; 2020 Jan; 38(1):73-78. PubMed ID: 31005392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of the Cardio First AngelTM on chest compression performance. Guenther SPW; Schirren M; Boulesteix AL; Busen H; Poettinger T; Pichlmaier AM; Khaladj N; Hagl C Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 28968250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Real-Time Mobile Device-Assisted Chest Compression During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Sarma S; Bucuti H; Chitnis A; Klacman A; Dantu R Am J Cardiol; 2017 Jul; 120(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 28550930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of one-rescuer compression/ventilation ratios on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infant, pediatric, and adult manikins. Srikantan SK; Berg RA; Cox T; Tice L; Nadkarni VM Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2005 May; 6(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 15857527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dominant hand position improves the quality of external chest compression: a manikin study based on 2010 CPR guidelines. Jiang C; Jiang S; Zhao Y; Xu B; Zhou XL J Emerg Med; 2015 Apr; 48(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 25648053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of step stool use and provider height on CPR quality during pediatric cardiac arrest: A simulation-based multicentre study. Cheng A; Lin Y; Nadkarni V; Wan B; Duff J; Brown L; Bhanji F; Kessler D; Tofil N; Hecker K; Hunt EA CJEM; 2018 Jan; 20(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 28367771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Using a smartwatch with real-time feedback improves the delivery of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation by healthcare professionals. Lu TC; Chang YT; Ho TW; Chen Y; Lee YT; Wang YS; Chen YP; Tsai CL; Ma MH; Fang CC; Lai F; Meischke HW; Turner AM Resuscitation; 2019 Jul; 140():16-22. PubMed ID: 31078650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparing three CPR feedback devices and standard BLS in a single rescuer scenario: a randomised simulation study. Zapletal B; Greif R; Stumpf D; Nierscher FJ; Frantal S; Haugk M; Ruetzler K; Schlimp C; Fischer H Resuscitation; 2014 Apr; 85(4):560-6. PubMed ID: 24215730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The impact of quantitative feedback on the performance of chest compression by basic life support trained clinical staff. Johnson M; Peat A; Boyd L; Warren T; Eastwood K; Smith G Nurse Educ Today; 2016 Oct; 45():163-6. PubMed ID: 27522335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long-term benefits of chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation training using real-time visual feedback manikins: a randomized simulation study. Jang TC; Ryoo HW; Moon S; Ahn JY; Lee DE; Lee WK; Kwak SG; Kim JH Clin Exp Emerg Med; 2020 Sep; 7(3):206-212. PubMed ID: 33028064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A 10-s rest improves chest compression quality during hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective, randomized crossover study using a manikin model. Min MK; Yeom SR; Ryu JH; Kim YI; Park MR; Han SK; Lee SH; Cho SJ Resuscitation; 2013 Sep; 84(9):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23402967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. CPR PRO® device reduces rescuer fatigue during continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover trial using a manikin model. Kovic I; Lulic D; Lulic I J Emerg Med; 2013 Oct; 45(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 23845522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and resuscitation training by combining audiovisual feedback and debriefing. Dine CJ; Gersh RE; Leary M; Riegel BJ; Bellini LM; Abella BS Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2817-22. PubMed ID: 18766092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]