These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30700916)

  • 1. Enhancing the quality and transparency of systematic reviews.
    García-Perdomo HA
    Colomb Med (Cali); 2018 Dec; 49(4):251-253. PubMed ID: 30700916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted?
    Afshari A; Wetterslev J; Smith AF
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Jan; 72(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 27804113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline.
    Campbell M; McKenzie JE; Sowden A; Katikireddi SV; Brennan SE; Ellis S; Hartmann-Boyce J; Ryan R; Shepperd S; Thomas J; Welch V; Thomson H
    BMJ; 2020 Jan; 368():l6890. PubMed ID: 31948937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PRISMA Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews.
    Arya S; Kaji AH; Boermeester MA
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Aug; 156(8):789-790. PubMed ID: 33825806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Not all systematic reviews are systematic: a meta-review of the quality of systematic reviews for non-invasive remote monitoring in heart failure.
    Conway A; Inglis SC; Chang AM; Horton-Breshears M; Cleland JG; Clark RA
    J Telemed Telecare; 2013 Sep; 19(6):326-37. PubMed ID: 24163297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.
    Page MJ; Moher D; Bossuyt PM; Boutron I; Hoffmann TC; Mulrow CD; Shamseer L; Tetzlaff JM; Akl EA; Brennan SE; Chou R; Glanville J; Grimshaw JM; Hróbjartsson A; Lalu MM; Li T; Loder EW; Mayo-Wilson E; McDonald S; McGuinness LA; Stewart LA; Thomas J; Tricco AC; Welch VA; Whiting P; McKenzie JE
    BMJ; 2021 Mar; 372():n160. PubMed ID: 33781993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Page MJ; Altman DG; McKenzie JE; Shamseer L; Ahmadzai N; Wolfe D; Yazdi F; Catalá-López F; Tricco AC; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():7-18. PubMed ID: 29203419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies.
    Engberg S
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 18496080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 21st Century Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
    Agarwal A; Rochwerg B; Sevransky JE
    Crit Care Med; 2021 Dec; 49(12):2001-2002. PubMed ID: 34582418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Missing Data in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.
    Chandelia S
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2022 Aug; 23(8):e400. PubMed ID: 36165947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews.
    Jadad AR; Cook DJ; Browman GP
    CMAJ; 1997 May; 156(10):1411-6. PubMed ID: 9164400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to Perform a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Imaging Studies.
    Cronin P; Kelly AM; Altaee D; Foerster B; Petrou M; Dwamena BA
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):573-593. PubMed ID: 29371119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological research: open questions, the need for 'research on research' and its implications for evidence-based health care and reducing research waste.
    Puljak L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2019 Sep; 17(3):145-146. PubMed ID: 31483324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards better-quality research reporting in Respirology.
    Eastwood P; Bultynck L; van Eekelen A; Norman C
    Respirology; 2014 Nov; 19(8):1093-4. PubMed ID: 25302754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Meta-analyses and systematic errors in publications].
    Bias R
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(1-2):39-40. PubMed ID: 11281127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II--Is all that glitters gold?
    Papageorgiou SN
    J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 25404669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Practice of systematic reviews. VII. Pooling of results from observational studies].
    Zeegers MP; Heisterkamp SH; Kostense PJ; van der Windt DA; Scholten RJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jul; 144(29):1393-7. PubMed ID: 10923147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked increase since 2009.
    Lee AW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 67(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 24090930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 6: PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist.
    Guise JM; Butler ME; Chang C; Viswanathan M; Pigott T; Tugwell P;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():43-50. PubMed ID: 28720516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.