373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30701408)
1. Building Moral Robots: Ethical Pitfalls and Challenges.
Gordon JS
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Feb; 26(1):141-157. PubMed ID: 30701408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Critiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents.
van Wynsberghe A; Robbins S
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Jun; 25(3):719-735. PubMed ID: 29460081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Moral expertise without moral elitism.
Smith WR
Bioethics; 2023 Jul; 37(6):564-574. PubMed ID: 35403726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Moral Machine experiment.
Awad E; Dsouza S; Kim R; Schulz J; Henrich J; Shariff A; Bonnefon JF; Rahwan I
Nature; 2018 Nov; 563(7729):59-64. PubMed ID: 30356211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The nature and value of bioethics expertise.
Vogelstein E
Bioethics; 2015 Jun; 29(5):324-33. PubMed ID: 25256867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Moral Philosophy, Moral Expertise, and the Argument from Disagreement.
Cross B
Bioethics; 2016 Mar; 30(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 26104240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. People are averse to machines making moral decisions.
Bigman YE; Gray K
Cognition; 2018 Dec; 181():21-34. PubMed ID: 30107256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The authority of the clinical ethicist.
Casarett DJ; Daskal F; Lantos J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(6):6-11. PubMed ID: 9868603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A conceptual and computational model of moral decision making in human and artificial agents.
Wallach W; Franklin S; Allen C
Top Cogn Sci; 2010 Jul; 2(3):454-85. PubMed ID: 25163872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Moral Consideration of Artificial Entities: A Literature Review.
Harris J; Anthis JR
Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Aug; 27(4):53. PubMed ID: 34370075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two Troubling Trends in the Conversation Over Whether Clinical Ethics Consultants Have Ethics Expertise.
Brummett A; Ostertag CJ
HEC Forum; 2018 Jun; 30(2):157-169. PubMed ID: 28421331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Who Should Decide How Machines Make Morally Laden Decisions?
Martin D
Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Aug; 23(4):951-967. PubMed ID: 27905083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Artificial Moral Agents: A Survey of the Current Status.
Cervantes JA; López S; Rodríguez LF; Cervantes S; Cervantes F; Ramos F
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):501-532. PubMed ID: 31721023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Moral expertise: a problem in the professional ethics of professional ethicists.
Crosthwaite J
Bioethics; 1995 Oct; 9(5):361-79. PubMed ID: 11653255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AIonAI: a humanitarian law of artificial intelligence and robotics.
Ashrafian H
Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Feb; 21(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 24414678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Self-driving car dilemmas reveal that moral choices are not universal.
Maxmen A
Nature; 2018 Oct; 562(7728):469-470. PubMed ID: 30356197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Balancing theory and practicality: engaging non-ethicists in ethical decision making related to radiological protection.
Martinez N; Wueste D
J Radiol Prot; 2016 Dec; 36(4):832-841. PubMed ID: 27725339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neglected ends: clinical ethics consultation and the prospects for closure.
Fiester A
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 25562222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of emotions in moral case deliberation: theory, practice, and methodology.
Molewijk B; Kleinlugtenbelt D; Widdershoven G
Bioethics; 2011 Sep; 25(7):383-93. PubMed ID: 21790692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethics of Incongruity: moral tension generators in clinical medicine.
Kontos N
J Med Ethics; 2019 Apr; 45(4):244-248. PubMed ID: 30777868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
