BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30701520)

  • 1. Prevalence and determinants of Caesarean delivery in Punjab, Pakistan.
    Abbas F; Ud Din RA; Sadiq M
    East Mediterr Health J; 2019 Jan; 24(11):1058-1065. PubMed ID: 30701520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlates of C-section in Punjab: a disaggregated analysis at the level of rural-urban residential status and place of delivery.
    Abbas F; Amir-Ud-Din R
    Women Health; 2019 Oct; 59(9):997-1014. PubMed ID: 30894083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in South and South-East Asian women.
    Verma V; Vishwakarma RK; Nath DC; Khan HTA; Prakash R; Abid O
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229906. PubMed ID: 32163440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prevalence of institutional delivery and its correlates amongst women of reproductive age in Mozambique: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Yaya S; Idriss-Wheeler D; Shibre G; Amouzou A; Bishwajit G
    Reprod Health; 2020 Apr; 17(1):49. PubMed ID: 32299468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trends of caesarean section deliveries in Pakistan: secondary data analysis from Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990-2018.
    Amjad A; Imran A; Shahram N; Zakar R; Usman A; Zakar MZ; Fischer F
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Dec; 20(1):753. PubMed ID: 33267787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with caesarean deliveries among child-bearing women in Pakistan: secondary analysis of data from the Demographic and Health Survey, 2012-13.
    Amjad A; Amjad U; Zakar R; Usman A; Zakar MZ; Fischer F
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Apr; 18(1):113. PubMed ID: 29685129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in private and public health facilities in underserved South Asian communities: cross-sectional analysis of data from Bangladesh, India and Nepal.
    Neuman M; Alcock G; Azad K; Kuddus A; Osrin D; More NS; Nair N; Tripathy P; Sikorski C; Saville N; Sen A; Colbourn T; Houweling TA; Seward N; Manandhar DS; Shrestha BP; Costello A; Prost A
    BMJ Open; 2014 Dec; 4(12):e005982. PubMed ID: 25550293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in the prevalence of cesarean section and associated factors in private and public healthcare systems in Peru.
    Hernández-Vásquez A; Chacón-Torrico H; Bendezu-Quispe G
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2020 Dec; 26():100570. PubMed ID: 33130536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in Jamaica.
    Webster LA; Daling JR; McFarlane C; Ashley D; Warren CW
    J Biosoc Sci; 1992 Oct; 24(4):515-25. PubMed ID: 1429779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rising trends and inequalities in cesarean section rates in Pakistan: Evidence from Pakistan Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990-2013.
    Mumtaz S; Bahk J; Khang YH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186563. PubMed ID: 29040316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in four Hard-to-Reach areas of Bangladesh: Findings from a cross-sectional survey.
    Karim F; Ali NB; Khan ANS; Hassan A; Hasan MM; Hoque DME; Billah SM; El Arifeen S; Chowdhury MAK
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234249. PubMed ID: 32516321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preference for institutional delivery and caesarean sections in Bangladesh.
    Kamal SM
    J Health Popul Nutr; 2013 Mar; 31(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 23617210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cesarean delivery in Nigeria: prevalence and associated factors-a population-based cross-sectional study.
    Adewuyi EO; Auta A; Khanal V; Tapshak SJ; Zhao Y
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e027273. PubMed ID: 31213450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sociodemographic Determinants of Caesarean Delivery in the Largest Public Maternity Hospital in Angola.
    Nimi T; Costa D; Campos P; Barros H
    Acta Med Port; 2019 Jun; 32(6):434-440. PubMed ID: 31292024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of social and cultural practices on maternal mortality: a qualitative study from South Punjab, Pakistan.
    Omer S; Zakar R; Zakar MZ; Fischer F
    Reprod Health; 2021 May; 18(1):97. PubMed ID: 34006307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors associated with the utilization of institutional delivery services in Bangladesh.
    Yaya S; Bishwajit G; Ekholuenetale M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171573. PubMed ID: 28192478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inequities in Antenatal Care, and Individual and Environmental Determinants of Utilization at National and Sub-national Level in Pakistan: A Multilevel Analysis.
    Sahito A; Fatmi Z
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Aug; 7(8):699-710. PubMed ID: 30078290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Socio-demographic and reproductive health profile of women who experienced signs of obstetric fistula: Results from Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey (PDHS) 2006-2007.
    Khan S; Zaheer S
    Midwifery; 2017 Nov; 54():61-66. PubMed ID: 28846883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India.
    Singh P; Hashmi G; Swain PK
    BMC Public Health; 2018 May; 18(1):613. PubMed ID: 29747609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing socio-ecological factors on caesarean section and vaginal delivery: an extended perspective among women of South-Punjab, Pakistan.
    Hassan MM; Ameeq M; Fatima L; Naz S; Sikandar SM; Kargbo A; Abbas S
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 44(1):2252983. PubMed ID: 37655783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.