These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30703015)

  • 1. Capacitively Coupled Electrical Impedance Tomography for Brain Imaging.
    Jiang YD; Soleimani M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2019 Sep; 38(9):2104-2113. PubMed ID: 30703015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the Performance of a Capacitively Coupled Electrical Impedance Tomography Sensor with Different Configurations.
    Jiang Y; He X; Wang B; Huang Z; Soleimani M
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(20):. PubMed ID: 33066126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feature-space assessment of electrical impedance tomography coregistered with computed tomography in detecting multiple contrast targets.
    Krishnan K; Liu J; Kohli K
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061903. PubMed ID: 24877814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image Reconstruction Using Supervised Learning in Wearable Electrical Impedance Tomography of the Thorax.
    Ivanenko M; Smolik WT; Wanta D; Midura M; Wróblewski P; Hou X; Yan X
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Sep; 23(18):. PubMed ID: 37765831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal combination of electrodes and conductive gels for brain electrical impedance tomography.
    Yang L; Li H; Ding J; Li W; Dong X; Wen Z; Shi X
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Dec; 17(1):186. PubMed ID: 30572888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel 3D-printed head phantom with anatomically realistic geometry and continuously varying skull resistivity distribution for electrical impedance tomography.
    Zhang J; Yang B; Li H; Fu F; Shi X; Dong X; Dai M
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):4608. PubMed ID: 28676697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrical conductivity imaging by magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
    Oh SH; Han JY; Lee SY; Cho MH; Lee BI; Woo EJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Oct; 50(4):875-8. PubMed ID: 14523975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical Impedance Tomography: Tissue Properties to Image Measures.
    Adler A; Boyle A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2494-2504. PubMed ID: 28715324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
    Woo EJ; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrical impedance tomography in 3D using two electrode planes: characterization and evaluation.
    Wagenaar J; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):922-37. PubMed ID: 27203154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrical Impedance Tomography: From the Traditional Design to the Novel Frontier of Wearables.
    Pennati F; Angelucci A; Morelli L; Bardini S; Barzanti E; Cavallini F; Conelli A; Di Federico G; Paganelli C; Aliverti A
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bi-frequency symmetry difference electrical impedance tomography-a novel technique for perturbation detection in static scenes.
    McDermott B; Avery J; O'Halloran M; Aristovich K; Porter E
    Physiol Meas; 2019 Apr; 40(4):044005. PubMed ID: 30786267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of thoracic vascular structures by electrical impedance tomography: a systematic assessment of prominence peak analysis of impedance changes.
    Wodack KH; Buehler S; Nishimoto SA; Graessler MF; Behem CR; Waldmann AD; Mueller B; Böhm SH; Kaniusas E; Thürk F; Maerz A; Trepte CJC; Reuter DA
    Physiol Meas; 2018 Feb; 39(2):024002. PubMed ID: 29350189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shape deformation in two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Boyle A; Adler A; Lionheart WR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2185-93. PubMed ID: 22711769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal distance of multi-plane sensor in three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Hao Z; Yue S; Sun B; Wang H
    Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2017 Dec; 22(sup1):326-338. PubMed ID: 29037075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrode boundary conditions and experimental validation for BEM-based EIT forward and inverse solutions.
    Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH; Isaacson D; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Sep; 25(9):1180-8. PubMed ID: 16967803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advances in electrical impedance tomography-based brain imaging.
    Ke XY; Hou W; Huang Q; Hou X; Bao XY; Kong WX; Li CX; Qiu YQ; Hu SY; Dong LH
    Mil Med Res; 2022 Feb; 9(1):10. PubMed ID: 35227324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of admittivity anomaly on high-contrast heterogeneous backgrounds using frequency difference EIT.
    Jang J; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2015 Jun; 36(6):1179-92. PubMed ID: 26008619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of applied and induced current electrical impedance tomography.
    Tanguay LF; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1643-9. PubMed ID: 17867356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.