868 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30703107)
1. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods.
Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods.
Hänfling B; Lawson Handley L; Read DS; Hahn C; Li J; Nichols P; Blackman RC; Oliver A; Winfield IJ
Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3101-19. PubMed ID: 27095076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals local fish communities in a species-rich coastal sea.
Yamamoto S; Masuda R; Sato Y; Sado T; Araki H; Kondoh M; Minamoto T; Miya M
Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():40368. PubMed ID: 28079122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial Representativeness of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Signal for Fish Biodiversity Assessment in a Natural Freshwater System.
Civade R; Dejean T; Valentini A; Roset N; Raymond JC; Bonin A; Taberlet P; Pont D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157366. PubMed ID: 27359116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness and limitations of sample pooling for environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish communities.
Sato H; Sogo Y; Doi H; Yamanaka H
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):14860. PubMed ID: 29093520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of mesocosm fish and amphibian species diversity via environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Evans NT; Olds BP; Renshaw MA; Turner CR; Li Y; Jerde CL; Mahon AR; Pfrender ME; Lamberti GA; Lodge DM
Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jan; 16(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26032773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fish eDNA metabarcoding from aquatic biofilm samples: Methodological aspects.
Rivera SF; Rimet F; Vasselon V; Vautier M; Domaizon I; Bouchez A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 May; 22(4):1440-1453. PubMed ID: 34863036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition.
Corral-Lou A; Doadrio I
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot.
Valdivia-Carrillo T; Rocha-Olivares A; Reyes-Bonilla H; Domínguez-Contreras JF; Munguia-Vega A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Jul; 21(5):1558-1574. PubMed ID: 33683812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding shows high potential as a novel approach to quantitatively assess fish community.
Tsuji S; Inui R; Nakao R; Miyazono S; Saito M; Kono T; Akamatsu Y
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21524. PubMed ID: 36513686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Illumina iSeq 100 and MiSeq exhibit similar performance in freshwater fish environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Nakao R; Inui R; Akamatsu Y; Goto M; Doi H; Matsuoka S
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):15763. PubMed ID: 34344957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unlocking biodiversity and conservation studies in high-diversity environments using environmental DNA (eDNA): A test with Guianese freshwater fishes.
Cilleros K; Valentini A; Allard L; Dejean T; Etienne R; Grenouillet G; Iribar A; Taberlet P; Vigouroux R; Brosse S
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jan; 19(1):27-46. PubMed ID: 29768738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Valentini A; Taberlet P; Miaud C; Civade R; Herder J; Thomsen PF; Bellemain E; Besnard A; Coissac E; Boyer F; Gaboriaud C; Jean P; Poulet N; Roset N; Copp GH; Geniez P; Pont D; Argillier C; Baudoin JM; Peroux T; Crivelli AJ; Olivier A; Acqueberge M; Le Brun M; Møller PR; Willerslev E; Dejean T
Mol Ecol; 2016 Feb; 25(4):929-42. PubMed ID: 26479867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring global fish species richness with eDNA metabarcoding.
Jerde CL; Wilson EA; Dressler TL
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jan; 19(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 30701707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities.
Miya M
Ann Rev Mar Sci; 2022 Jan; 14():161-185. PubMed ID: 34351788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monitoring freshwater fish communities in large rivers using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a long-term electrofishing survey.
Goutte A; Molbert N; Guérin S; Richoux R; Rocher V
J Fish Biol; 2020 Aug; 97(2):444-452. PubMed ID: 32412670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Environmental DNA metabarcoding as an effective and rapid tool for fish monitoring in canals.
McDevitt AD; Sales NG; Browett SS; Sparnenn AO; Mariani S; Wangensteen OS; Coscia I; Benvenuto C
J Fish Biol; 2019 Aug; 95(2):679-682. PubMed ID: 31183856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative monitoring of diverse fish communities on a large scale combining eDNA metabarcoding and qPCR.
Pont D; Meulenbroek P; Bammer V; Dejean T; Erős T; Jean P; Lenhardt M; Nagel C; Pekarik L; Schabuss M; Stoeckle BC; Stoica E; Zornig H; Weigand A; Valentini A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Feb; 23(2):396-409. PubMed ID: 36151931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatio-temporal variability of eDNA signal and its implication for fish monitoring in lakes.
Hervé A; Domaizon I; Baudoin JM; Dejean T; Gibert P; Jean P; Peroux T; Raymond JC; Valentini A; Vautier M; Logez M
PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272660. PubMed ID: 35960745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
