182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30703183)
1. Effect of Labial Implant Inclination on the Retention and Stability of Different Resilient Stud Attachments for Mandibular Implant Overdentures: An In vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ibrahim AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):381–389. PubMed ID: 30703183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures Using Different Types of Resilient Attachments: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Agha NN; Habib AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1040-8. PubMed ID: 27632258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Different Degrees of Mesial Implant Inclination on the Retention and Stability of Two-Implant Mandibular Overdentures Retained with Stud Attachments: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Abo Hatem OE; Shawky AF; Emera RMK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):259–268. PubMed ID: 29028850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Distal Implant Inclination on Dislodging Forces of Different Locator Attachments Used for Mandibular Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ashmawy TM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e666-e674. PubMed ID: 29143403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retentive Properties of O-Ring and Locator Attachments for Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Elhaddad AA; Khirallah AS
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):568-576. PubMed ID: 27589487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Influence of Implant Inclination on Retention and Peri-implant Stresses of Stud-Retained Implant Overdentures During Axial and Nonaxial Dislodgments: An In Vitro Study.
Alameldeen HE; Elsyad MA; Shawky AF; Khirallah AS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(3):543-550. PubMed ID: 32406652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention and Stability of Rigid Telescopic and Milled Bar Attachments for Implant-Supported Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Soliman TA; Khalifa AK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):e127–e133. PubMed ID: 29894548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resilient Stud Versus Bar Attachments for Inclined Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures. An In Vitro Study of Loading and Dislodging Strains.
Elhelbawy NG; ELsyad MA; Soliman TA; Mahrous A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(5):982-988. PubMed ID: 36170313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peri-implant strain around mesially inclined two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with Locator attachments.
Elsyad MA; Eltowery SM; Gebreel AA
J Oral Sci; 2017 Dec; 59(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 29093282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Locator Versus Bar Attachment Effect on the Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdenture: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Dayekh MA; Khalifa AK
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e627-e636. PubMed ID: 28387994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retentive Properties of Two Stud Attachments with Polyetherketoneketone or Nylon Insert in Mandibular Implant Overdentures.
Choi JW; Yun BH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 30231095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures.
Sadig W
Quintessence Int; 2009 Apr; 40(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 19417876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Resilient Stud Versus Bar Attachments for Immediately Loaded Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures: 1-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Elsyad MA; Alsabri MA; Elgamal M; Al-Tonbary GY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):346-354. PubMed ID: 33909726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of different implant positions on strain developed around four implants supporting a mandibular overdenture with rigid telescopic copings.
ELsyad MA; Elsaadawy MG; Abdou AM; Habib AA
Quintessence Int; 2013 Oct; 44(9):679-86. PubMed ID: 23479591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis.
Hong HR; Pae A; Kim Y; Paek J; Kim HS; Kwon KR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e69-76. PubMed ID: 23057045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution.
Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1619-28. PubMed ID: 24278931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
