These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30703183)

  • 61. Peri-implant tissue health and patient satisfaction of vertical versus inclined posterior implants used to support overdentures with bar attachments. A one-year randomized trial.
    Ibrahim CRM; Awad S; Habib AA; Elsyad MA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Aug; 24(4):424-434. PubMed ID: 35704472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effects of overdenture retention designs and implant orientations on load transfer characteristics.
    Federick DR; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Dec; 76(6):624-32. PubMed ID: 8957789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Influence of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant overdentures.
    Oda K; Kanazawa M; Takeshita S; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):380-385. PubMed ID: 27677217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial.
    Krennmair G; Seemann R; Fazekas A; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1560-8. PubMed ID: 23189311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
    Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Effect of implant angulation on attachment retention in mandibular two-implant overdentures: a clinical study.
    Jabbour Z; Fromentin O; Lassauzay C; Abi Nader S; Correa JA; Feine J; de Albuquerque Junior RF
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):565-71. PubMed ID: 23305358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The influence of resilient liner and clip attachments for bar-implant-retained mandibular overdentures on opposing maxillary ridge. A 5-year randomised clinical trial.
    Elsyad MA; Ashmawy TM; Faramawy AG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 41(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 24354686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Lateral forces exerted through ball or bar attachments in relation to the inclination of mini-implant underneath overdentures: in vitro study.
    Takagaki K; Gonda T; Maeda Y
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1060-3. PubMed ID: 24730651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems.
    Takeshita S; Kanazawa M; Minakuchi S
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(6):928-34. PubMed ID: 22123019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Marginal Bone Response Around Immediate- and Delayed-Loading Implants Supporting a Locator-Retained Mandibular Overdenture: A Randomized Controlled Study.
    Schincaglia GP; Rubin S; Thacker S; Dhingra A; Trombelli L; Ioannidou E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):448-58. PubMed ID: 27004292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
    Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The effect of location and number of endosseous implants on retention and stability of magnetically retained mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Wahab LA; Sadig W
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):511-3. PubMed ID: 19149068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Retention characteristics of different attachment systems of mandibular overdentures retained by two or three implants.
    Uludag B; Polat S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1509-13. PubMed ID: 23189303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
    J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Posterior Mandibular Ridge Resorption Associated with Different Retentive Systems for Overdentures: A 7-Year Retrospective Preliminary Study.
    Elsyad MA; Mohamed SS; Shawky AF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(3):260–265. PubMed ID: 28319208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Five-year prospective evaluation of mandibular overdentures retained by two microthreaded, TiOblast nonsplinted implants and retentive ball anchors.
    Cooper LF; Moriarty JD; Guckes AD; Klee LB; Smith RG; Almgren C; Felton DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):696-704. PubMed ID: 18807567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Marginal bone resorption around immediate and delayed loaded implants supporting a locator-retained mandibular overdenture. A 1-year randomised controlled trial.
    Elsyad MA; Elsaih EA; Khairallah AS
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Aug; 41(8):608-18. PubMed ID: 24814408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Effect of Attachment Type on Implant Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Comparison of Ball, Locator, and Magnet Attachments. Part 1. Overdenture with Palate.
    Takahashi T; Gonda T; Maeda Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):1308–1314. PubMed ID: 28938033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A prospective randomized study on the immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by one or two implants: a 12-month follow-up report.
    Kronstrom M; Davis B; Loney R; Gerrow J; Hollender L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 20209200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.