238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30703259)
1. Validation of lesion simulations in clinical CT data for anonymized chest and abdominal CT databases.
Robins M; Solomon J; Koweek LMH; Christensen J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1931-1937. PubMed ID: 30703259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low-dose CT image and projection dataset.
Moen TR; Chen B; Holmes DR; Duan X; Yu Z; Yu L; Leng S; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 48(2):902-911. PubMed ID: 33202055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Simulated Lesions as Surrogates to Clinical Lesions for Thoracic CT Volumetry: The Results of an International Challenge.
Robins M; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Obuchowski NA; Buckler A; Athelogou M; Jarecha R; Petrick N; Pezeshk A; Sahiner B; Samei E
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):e161-e173. PubMed ID: 30219290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Segmentation of lung lesions on CT scans using watershed, active contours, and Markov random field.
Tan Y; Schwartz LH; Zhao B
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):043502. PubMed ID: 23556926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Localization of liver lesions in abdominal CT imaging: II. Mathematical model observer performance correlates with human observer performance for localization of liver lesions in abdominal CT imaging.
Dilger SKN; Leng S; Chen B; Carter RE; Favazza CP; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH; Yu L
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105012. PubMed ID: 30995626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A deep learning- and partial least square regression-based model observer for a low-contrast lesion detection task in CT.
Gong H; Yu L; Leng S; Dilger SK; Ren L; Zhou W; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2052-2063. PubMed ID: 30889282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) and Image Database Resource Initiative (IDRI): a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans.
Armato SG; McLennan G; Bidaut L; McNitt-Gray MF; Meyer CR; Reeves AP; Zhao B; Aberle DR; Henschke CI; Hoffman EA; Kazerooni EA; MacMahon H; Van Beeke EJ; Yankelevitz D; Biancardi AM; Bland PH; Brown MS; Engelmann RM; Laderach GE; Max D; Pais RC; Qing DP; Roberts RY; Smith AR; Starkey A; Batrah P; Caligiuri P; Farooqi A; Gladish GW; Jude CM; Munden RF; Petkovska I; Quint LE; Schwartz LH; Sundaram B; Dodd LE; Fenimore C; Gur D; Petrick N; Freymann J; Kirby J; Hughes B; Casteele AV; Gupte S; Sallamm M; Heath MD; Kuhn MH; Dharaiya E; Burns R; Fryd DS; Salganicoff M; Anand V; Shreter U; Vastagh S; Croft BY
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):915-31. PubMed ID: 21452728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Localization of liver lesions in abdominal CT imaging: I. Correlation of human observer performance between anatomical and uniform backgrounds.
Dilger SKN; Yu L; Chen B; Favazza CP; Carter RE; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH; Leng S
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105011. PubMed ID: 30995611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and CT image-domain validation of a computational lung lesion model for use in virtual imaging trials.
Sauer TJ; Bejan A; Segars P; Samei E
Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4366-4378. PubMed ID: 36637206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shape-based computer-aided detection of lung nodules in thoracic CT images.
Ye X; Lin X; Dehmeshki J; Slabaugh G; Beddoe G
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jul; 56(7):1810-20. PubMed ID: 19527950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Techniques for virtual lung nodule insertion: volumetric and morphometric comparison of projection-based and image-based methods for quantitative CT.
Robins M; Solomon J; Sahbaee P; Sedlmair M; Roy Choudhury K; Pezeshk A; Sahiner B; Samei E
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(18):7280-7299. PubMed ID: 28786399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simplified cluster model and a tool adapted for collaborative labeling of lung cancer CT scans.
Morozov SP; Gombolevskiy VA; Elizarov AB; Gusev MA; Novik VP; Prokudaylo SB; Bardin AS; Popov EV; Ledikhova NV; Chernina VY; Blokhin IA; Nikolaev AE; Reshetnikov RV; Vladzymyrskyy AV; Kulberg NS
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Jul; 206():106111. PubMed ID: 33957377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantifying the margin sharpness of lesions on radiological images for content-based image retrieval.
Xu J; Napel S; Greenspan H; Beaulieu CF; Agrawal N; Rubin D
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5405-18. PubMed ID: 22957608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comprehensive lung CT landmark pair dataset for evaluating deformable image registration algorithms.
Criscuolo ER; Fu Y; Hao Y; Zhang Z; Yang D
Med Phys; 2024 May; 51(5):3806-3817. PubMed ID: 38478966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of compressive sensing technique in dose reduction for chest computed tomography: a prospective blinded clinical study.
Khawaja RD; Singh S; Lira D; Bippus R; Do S; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Koehler T; Shepard JA; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):760-7. PubMed ID: 24834892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pediatric chest-abdomen-pelvis and abdomen-pelvis CT images with expert organ contours.
Jordan P; Adamson PM; Bhattbhatt V; Beriwal S; Shen S; Radermecker O; Bose S; Strain LS; Offe M; Fraley D; Principi S; Ye DH; Wang AS; van Heteren J; Vo NJ; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3523-3528. PubMed ID: 35067940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Novel Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme on Small Annotated Set: G2C-CAD.
Zheng G; Han G; Soomro NQ; Ma L; Zhang F; Zhao Y; Zhao X; Zhou C
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():6425963. PubMed ID: 31119180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Large scale validation of the M5L lung CAD on heterogeneous CT datasets.
Torres EL; Fiorina E; Pennazio F; Peroni C; Saletta M; Camarlinghi N; Fantacci ME; Cerello P
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1477-89. PubMed ID: 25832038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of a Computer-aided Detection System Based on Chest Tomosynthesis Imaging for the Detection of Pulmonary Nodules.
Yamada Y; Shiomi E; Hashimoto M; Abe T; Matsusako M; Saida Y; Ogawa K
Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):333-339. PubMed ID: 29206596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimum perceivable size difference: how well can radiologists visually detect a change in lung nodule size from CT images?
Solomon J; Ebner L; Christe A; Peters A; Munz J; Löbelenz L; Klaus J; Richards T; Samei E; Roos JE
Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):1947-1955. PubMed ID: 32997175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
