364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30704404)
21. A comparison of topologically associating domain callers over mammals at high resolution.
Sefer E
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):127. PubMed ID: 35413815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Detecting Long-Range Enhancer-Promoter Interactions by Quantitative Chromosome Conformation Capture.
Deng W; Blobel GA
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1468():51-62. PubMed ID: 27662870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Principles of genome folding into topologically associating domains.
Szabo Q; Bantignies F; Cavalli G
Sci Adv; 2019 Apr; 5(4):eaaw1668. PubMed ID: 30989119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dynamics of transcriptional enhancers and chromosome topology in gene regulation.
Yokoshi M; Fukaya T
Dev Growth Differ; 2019 Jun; 61(5):343-352. PubMed ID: 30780195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Methods for the Analysis of Topologically Associating Domains (TADs).
Zufferey M; Tavernari D; Ciriello G
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2301():39-59. PubMed ID: 34415530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture.
Cubeñas-Potts C; Rowley MJ; Lyu X; Li G; Lei EP; Corces VG
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Feb; 45(4):1714-1730. PubMed ID: 27899590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evolutionary stability of topologically associating domains is associated with conserved gene regulation.
Krefting J; Andrade-Navarro MA; Ibn-Salem J
BMC Biol; 2018 Aug; 16(1):87. PubMed ID: 30086749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Identification of activated enhancers and linked transcription factors in breast, prostate, and kidney tumors by tracing enhancer networks using epigenetic traits.
Rhie SK; Guo Y; Tak YG; Yao L; Shen H; Coetzee GA; Laird PW; Farnham PJ
Epigenetics Chromatin; 2016; 9():50. PubMed ID: 27833659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Integrated paired-end enhancer profiling and whole-genome sequencing reveals recurrent
Ooi WF; Nargund AM; Lim KJ; Zhang S; Xing M; Mandoli A; Lim JQ; Ho SWT; Guo Y; Yao X; Lin SJ; Nandi T; Xu C; Ong X; Lee M; Tan AL; Lam YN; Teo JX; Kaneda A; White KP; Lim WK; Rozen SG; Teh BT; Li S; Skanderup AJ; Tan P
Gut; 2020 Jun; 69(6):1039-1052. PubMed ID: 31542774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of epigenetic modifications, long-range contacts, enhancers and topologically associating domains in the regulation of glioma grade-specific genes.
Grabowicz IE; Wilczyński B; Kamińska B; Roura AJ; Wojtaś B; Dąbrowski MJ
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):15668. PubMed ID: 34341417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Active chromatin and transcription play a key role in chromosome partitioning into topologically associating domains.
Ulianov SV; Khrameeva EE; Gavrilov AA; Flyamer IM; Kos P; Mikhaleva EA; Penin AA; Logacheva MD; Imakaev MV; Chertovich A; Gelfand MS; Shevelyov YY; Razin SV
Genome Res; 2016 Jan; 26(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 26518482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of 3D Chromatin Interactions Using Hi-C.
Hu G
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2117():65-78. PubMed ID: 31960372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Looking for Broken TAD Boundaries and Changes on DNA Interactions: Clinical Guide to 3D Chromatin Change Analysis in Complex Chromosomal Rearrangements and Chromothripsis.
Yauy K; Gatinois V; Guignard T; Sati S; Puechberty J; Gaillard JB; Schneider A; Pellestor F
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1769():353-361. PubMed ID: 29564835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of computational methods for Hi-C data analysis.
Forcato M; Nicoletti C; Pal K; Livi CM; Ferrari F; Bicciato S
Nat Methods; 2017 Jul; 14(7):679-685. PubMed ID: 28604721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Co-regulation of paralog genes in the three-dimensional chromatin architecture.
Ibn-Salem J; Muro EM; Andrade-Navarro MA
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Jan; 45(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 27634932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Large scale genomic reorganization of topological domains at the HoxD locus.
Fabre PJ; Leleu M; Mormann BH; Lopez-Delisle L; Noordermeer D; Beccari L; Duboule D
Genome Biol; 2017 Aug; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 28784160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Epigenetics of Muscle- and Brain-Specific Expression of KLHL Family Genes.
Ehrlich KC; Baribault C; Ehrlich M
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Nov; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 33182325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Demystifying the secret mission of enhancers: linking distal regulatory elements to target genes.
Yao L; Berman BP; Farnham PJ
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol; 2015; 50(6):550-73. PubMed ID: 26446758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. TAD-like single-cell domain structures exist on both active and inactive X chromosomes and persist under epigenetic perturbations.
Cheng Y; Liu M; Hu M; Wang S
Genome Biol; 2021 Nov; 22(1):309. PubMed ID: 34749781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Formation of new chromatin domains determines pathogenicity of genomic duplications.
Franke M; Ibrahim DM; Andrey G; Schwarzer W; Heinrich V; Schöpflin R; Kraft K; Kempfer R; Jerković I; Chan WL; Spielmann M; Timmermann B; Wittler L; Kurth I; Cambiaso P; Zuffardi O; Houge G; Lambie L; Brancati F; Pombo A; Vingron M; Spitz F; Mundlos S
Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7624):265-269. PubMed ID: 27706140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
