BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30704657)

  • 1. Update on Osteoporosis.
    Yedavally-Yellayi S; Ho AM; Patalinghug EM
    Prim Care; 2019 Mar; 46(1):175-190. PubMed ID: 30704657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
    Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
    Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening for osteoporosis in the adult U.S. population: ACPM position statement on preventive practice.
    Lim LS; Hoeksema LJ; Sherin K;
    Am J Prev Med; 2009 Apr; 36(4):366-75. PubMed ID: 19285200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Efficacy of densitometry and fracture risk assessment tool FRAX in making therapeutic decisions in osteoporosis--a study on female patients of university of medical sciences endocrinology outpatient clinic].
    Ignaszak-Szczepaniak M; Dytfeld J; Michalak M; Gowin E; Horst-Sikorska W
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Jun; 80(6):424-31. PubMed ID: 19642598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool.
    Lin J; Yang Y; Fei Q; Zhang X; Ma Z; Wang Q; Li J; Li D; Meng Q; Wang B
    Clin Interv Aging; 2016; 11():461-9. PubMed ID: 27217730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®): applications in clinical practice.
    Watts NB
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Apr; 20(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 21438699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone health management in prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy.
    Dhanapal V; Reeves DJ
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2012 Mar; 18(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 21807761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of electronic and manual fracture risk assessment tools in screening elderly male US veterans at risk for osteoporosis.
    Williams ST; Lawrence PT; Miller KL; Crook JL; LaFleur J; Cannon GW; Nelson RE
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Nov; 28(11):3107-3111. PubMed ID: 28756457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Worldwide Fracture Prediction.
    El-Hajj Fuleihan G; Chakhtoura M; Cauley JA; Chamoun N
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):397-424. PubMed ID: 28734709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FRAX without bone mineral density versus osteoporosis self-assessment screening tool as predictors of osteoporosis in primary screening of individuals aged 70 and older.
    Pang WY; Inderjeeth CA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2014 Mar; 62(3):442-6. PubMed ID: 24617899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of FRAX as a determinant for risk-based osteoporosis screening may decrease unnecessary testing while improving the odds of identifying treatment candidates.
    Edwards FD; Grover ML; Cook CB; Chang YH
    Womens Health Issues; 2014; 24(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 25128036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Osteoporosis prevention, screening, and treatment: a review.
    Kling JM; Clarke BL; Sandhu NP
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2014 Jul; 23(7):563-72. PubMed ID: 24766381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary care use of FRAX: absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women and older men.
    Siris ES; Baim S; Nattiv A
    Postgrad Med; 2010 Jan; 122(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 20107292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing bone density in men.
    Orwoll E
    J Bone Miner Res; 2000 Oct; 15(10):1867-70. PubMed ID: 11028437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Follow-up for osteoporosis in older patients three years after a fracture.
    Schurink M; Hegeman JH; Kreeftenberg HG; Ten Duis HJ
    Neth J Med; 2007 Feb; 65(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 17379932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Utility and problems of FRAX in clinical use].
    Nakatoh S
    Clin Calcium; 2009 Dec; 19(12):1756-67. PubMed ID: 19949267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trabecular bone score may improve FRAX® prediction accuracy for major osteoporotic fractures in elderly Japanese men: the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men (FORMEN) Cohort Study.
    Iki M; Fujita Y; Tamaki J; Kouda K; Yura A; Sato Y; Moon JS; Winzenrieth R; Okamoto N; Kurumatani N
    Osteoporos Int; 2015 Jun; 26(6):1841-8. PubMed ID: 25752623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score (MORES) With FRAX in Identifying Men at Risk for Osteoporosis.
    Cass AR; Shepherd AJ; Asirot R; Mahajan M; Nizami M
    Ann Fam Med; 2016 Jul; 14(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 27401426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Osteoporosis in premenopause. When are screening and treatment prudent?
    Derk CT
    Postgrad Med; 2006; 119(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 16913642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Osteoporosis management in older patients who experienced a fracture.
    Oertel MJ; Graves L; Al-Hihi E; Leonardo V; Hopkins C; DeSouza K; Bhattacharya RK
    Clin Interv Aging; 2016; 11():1111-6. PubMed ID: 27578967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.