172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30704769)
21. Effect of table height displacement and patient center deviation on size-specific dose estimates calculated from computed tomography localizer radiographs.
Kuriyama K; Matsubara K; Hisahara S; Nagata Y; Nosaka R; Goto R; Yanano N; Shimizu K; Shoji T
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2020 Jun; 43(2):665-672. PubMed ID: 32378125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Inadequate object positioning and improvement of automatic exposure control system calculations based on an empirical algorithm.
Furukawa Y; Matsubara K; Miyati T
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Mar; 44(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 33252720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Patient dose increase caused by posteroanterior CT localizer radiographs.
Urikura A; Miyauchi Y; Yoshida T; Ishita Y; Takiguchi K; Endo M; Aramaki T
Radiography (Lond); 2023 Mar; 29(2):334-339. PubMed ID: 36709524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bone Mineral Density Quantification from Localizer Radiographs: Accuracy and Precision of Energy-integrating Detector CT and Photon-counting Detector CT.
Nowak T; Eberhard M; Schmidt B; Frey D; Distler O; Saltybaeva N; Alkadhi H; Euler A
Radiology; 2021 Jan; 298(1):147-152. PubMed ID: 33141002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms.
Brisse HJ; Madec L; Gaboriaud G; Lemoine T; Savignoni A; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3018-33. PubMed ID: 17822010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Technical Note: Radiation dose reduction from computed tomography localizer radiographs using a tin spectral shaping filter.
Saltybaeva N; Krauss A; Alkadhi H
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):544-549. PubMed ID: 30578731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Estimating patient dose from CT exams that use automatic exposure control: Development and validation of methods to accurately estimate tube current values.
McMillan K; Bostani M; Cagnon CH; Yu L; Leng S; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4262-4275. PubMed ID: 28477342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Methods for CT automatic exposure control protocol translation between scanner platforms.
McKenney SE; Seibert JA; Lamba R; Boone JM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Mar; 11(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 24589404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. INFLUENCE OF LOCALIZER AND SCAN DIRECTION ON THE DOSE-REDUCING EFFECT OF AUTOMATIC TUBE CURRENT MODULATION IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
Franck C; Bacher K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):136-42. PubMed ID: 27056145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Considerations on an automatic computed tomography tube current modulation system.
Moro L; Panizza D; D'Ambrosio D; Carne I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Oct; 156(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 23584497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Setting up computed tomography automatic tube current modulation systems.
Martin CJ; Sookpeng S
J Radiol Prot; 2016 Sep; 36(3):R74-R95. PubMed ID: 27485613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dependency of prescribed CT dose on table height, patient size, and localizer acquisition for one clinical MDCT.
Winslow J; Zhang Y; Koweek L; Samei E
Phys Med; 2018 Nov; 55():56-60. PubMed ID: 30471820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option.
Verellen D; Vinh-Hung V; Bijdekerke P; Nijs F; Linthout N; Bel A; Storme G
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Mar; 50(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 10392823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The impact of x-ray tube stabilization on localized radiation dose in axial CT scans: initial results in CTDI phantoms.
Mathieu KB; McNitt-Gray MF; Cody DD
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(20):7363-7376. PubMed ID: 27694696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Design and use of a phantom for testing and comparing the performance of computed tomography automatic tube current modulation systems.
Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Krisanachinda A
J Radiol Prot; 2020 Sep; 40(3):753-773. PubMed ID: 32303017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.
Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6084-92. PubMed ID: 22047373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Efficient use of automatic exposure control systems in computed tomography requires correct patient positioning.
Gudjonsdottir J; Svensson JR; Campling S; Brennan PC; Jonsdottir B
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):1035-41. PubMed ID: 19863414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Calculation of water equivalent diameter based on anteroposterior localizer CT images].
Liang B; Fu Y; Cao M
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2020 Jun; 40(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 32895192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
