172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30704769)
41. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?
Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Upper limits of the photon fluence rate on CT detectors: Case study on a commercial scanner.
Persson M; Bujila R; Nowik P; Andersson H; Kull L; Andersson J; Bornefalk H; Danielsson M
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4398. PubMed ID: 27370155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of different phantom designs for CT scanner automatic tube current modulation system tests.
Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):735-61. PubMed ID: 24025482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Impact of the scout view orientation on the radiation exposure and image quality in thoracic and abdominal CT.
Suntharalingam S; Wetter A; Guberina N; Theysohn J; Ringelstein A; Schlosser T; Forsting M; Nassenstein K
Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):4072-4079. PubMed ID: 26943131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Variability of MDCT dose due to technologist performance: impact of posteroanterior versus anteroposterior localizer image and table height with use of automated tube current modulation.
Harri PA; Moreno CC; Nelson RC; Fani N; Small WC; Duong PA; Tang X; Applegate KE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):377-86. PubMed ID: 25055274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency.
Krauss B; Grant KL; Schmidt BT; Flohr TG
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 25373305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Practical experiences in the transfer of clinical protocols between CT scanners with different ATCM systems.
Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Cheebsumon P; Pengpan T
J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 27977415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Characterization and implementation of OSL dosimeters for use in evaluating the efficacy of organ-based tube current modulation for CT scans of the face and orbits.
Marsh RM; Silosky M
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1730-8. PubMed ID: 25832062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype.
Daly MJ; Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Jaffray DA; Irish JC
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3767-80. PubMed ID: 17089842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Utility of lower tube voltage scans in reducing exposure of healthcare workers within computed tomography room to scattered radiation.
Arao S; Masuda T; Oku T; Ono A; Okura Y
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2023 Nov; 199(19):2338-2343. PubMed ID: 37646071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Ultra-high pitch chest computed tomography at 70 kVp tube voltage in an anthropomorphic pediatric phantom and non-sedated pediatric patients: Initial experience with 3
Hagelstein C; Henzler T; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; Sudarski S; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW; Weis M
Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):349-361. PubMed ID: 26702762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Estimating patient water equivalent diameter from CT localizer images - A longitudinal and multi-institutional study of the stability of calibration parameters.
Zhang D; Liu X; Duan X; Bankier AA; Rong J; Palmer MR
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2139-2149. PubMed ID: 32086943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evaluating the impact of scan settings on automatic tube current modulation in CT using a novel phantom.
Merzan D; Nowik P; Poludniowski G; Bujila R
Br J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 90(1069):20160308. PubMed ID: 27845559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Estimating size specific dose estimate from computed tomography radiograph localizer with radiation risk assessment.
Burton CS; Al-Ward S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 24(6):e13989. PubMed ID: 37132289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Objective comparison of high-contrast spatial resolution and low-contrast detectability for various clinical protocols on multiple CT scanners.
Racine D; Viry A; Becce F; Schmidt S; Ba A; Bochud FO; Edyvean S; Schegerer A; Verdun FR
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):e153-e163. PubMed ID: 28901621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Reducing radiation exposure from survey CT scans.
O'Daniel JC; Stevens DM; Cody DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Aug; 185(2):509-15. PubMed ID: 16037529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
