These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30705889)

  • 1. Short-term efficacy of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for low rectal cancer.
    Hu JH; Li XW; Wang CY; Zhang JJ; Ge Z; Li BH; Lin XH
    World J Clin Cases; 2019 Jan; 7(2):122-129. PubMed ID: 30705889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of the mid- and long-term outcomes between natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery with abdominal auxiliary incision in the treatment of rectal cancer based on propensity score matching method].
    Xu S; Zhang H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 24(8):698-703. PubMed ID: 34412187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short-term efficacy of transvaginal specimen extraction for right colon cancer based on propensity score matching: A retrospective cohort study.
    Li XW; Wang CY; Zhang JJ; Ge Z; Lin XH; Hu JH
    Int J Surg; 2019 Dec; 72():102-108. PubMed ID: 31362128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled study with 3-year follow-up results].
    Chen ZZ; Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yuan SS; Yan F; Wang ZF; Liu GY; Qiu XF; Cai JC
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jul; 25(7):604-611. PubMed ID: 35844123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term oncologic outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment of rectal cancer: a propensity-score matching study.
    Li Z; Xiong H; Qiao T; Jiao S; Zhu Y; Wang G; Wang X; Tang Q
    BMC Surg; 2022 Jul; 22(1):286. PubMed ID: 35879754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus robotic transabdominal specimen extraction surgery for early-stage rectal cancer: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis (in China).
    Liu D; He G; Yao H; Guan X; Wang G; Xiong D; Hu J; Yuan W; Yang C; He P; Ye S; Ju H; Yu H; Niu Z; Liu K; Tang Q; Huang R; Lian Y; Guan S; Jian J; Wei Y; Wang X; Li T
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Aug; 38(8):4521-4530. PubMed ID: 38914889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.
    Feng Q; Ng SSM; Zhang Z; Lin S; Niu Z; Wei Y; He G; Chang W; Zhu D; Xu J
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 124(4):607-618. PubMed ID: 34076898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study.
    Tang Q; Zhu Y; Xiong H; Sheng X; Hu Z; Hu H; Huang R; Zhang Q; Yuan Z; Xie L; Gao Z; Wang Y; Wang G; Wang X
    Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():2247-2257. PubMed ID: 33727861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short- and long-term outcomes as well as anal function of transanal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal cancer resection: a retrospective study with over 5-year follow-up.
    Zhang J; Li W; Li Y; Amin B; Zhang N; Sun Z; Zhu B
    Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2022 Jun; 17(2):344-351. PubMed ID: 35707343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advancing mid-rectal cancer surgery: Unveiling the potential of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in comparison to conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection.
    Muhammad S; Jiang Z; Fan T; Tang Q; Hai Y; Ehsan SBE; Bilal M; Zubayraeva AA; Gao Y; He J
    Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2024 May; 7(5):e2003. PubMed ID: 38703000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Propensity score matching-based analysis of short-term outcomes of Laparoscopic-assisted Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction for left colorectal cancer radical resection].
    Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Qiu XF; Yan F; Yuan SS; Cai JC
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 May; 96(20):1578-81. PubMed ID: 27266686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Short-term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction].
    Gao GM; Liu DN; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1124-1130. PubMed ID: 31874527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer.
    Ding Y; Li Z; Gao H; Cao Y; Jin W
    J BUON; 2019; 24(5):1817-1823. PubMed ID: 31786842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment effects of low rectal cancer.
    Zhu Y; Xiong H; Chen Y; Liu Z; Jiang Z; Huang R; Gao F; Zhang Q; Wang M; Jin Y; Qiao T; Ma T; Hu H; Wang X; Tang Q; Wang G
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):9338. PubMed ID: 33927293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery on 162 cases with rectal neoplasms].
    Zhou JJ; Li TG; Lei SL; Chen WD; Liu KJ; Liu B; Yao HL
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 32306607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of short-term outcomes of transrectal specimen extraction during laparoscopic sigmoid radical resection versus conventional laparoscopically assisted procedure].
    Xing J; Zhang C; Yang X; Wang H; Wang H; Yu E; Fu C
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 20(6):665-670. PubMed ID: 28643312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of short-term efficacy analysis of medium-rectal cancer surgery with robotic natural orifice specimen extraction and robotic transabdominal specimen extraction.
    Ye SP; Lu WJ; Liu DN; Yu HX; Wu C; Xu HC; Li TY
    BMC Surg; 2023 Nov; 23(1):336. PubMed ID: 37940918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with sigmoid colon/high rectal cancer.
    He Q; Huang J; Niu L; Zhai C
    J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 127(7):1160-1166. PubMed ID: 36913188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in short-terms outcomes of middle rectal cancer.
    Ye SP; Yu HX; Liu DN; Lu WJ; Wu C; Xu HC; Li TY
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):196. PubMed ID: 37403084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method
    Tao F; Liu DN; He PH; Luo X; Xu CY; Li TY; Duan JY
    World J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Oct; 15(10):2142-2153. PubMed ID: 37969697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.