BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30705889)

  • 1. Short-term efficacy of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for low rectal cancer.
    Hu JH; Li XW; Wang CY; Zhang JJ; Ge Z; Li BH; Lin XH
    World J Clin Cases; 2019 Jan; 7(2):122-129. PubMed ID: 30705889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of the mid- and long-term outcomes between natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery with abdominal auxiliary incision in the treatment of rectal cancer based on propensity score matching method].
    Xu S; Zhang H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 24(8):698-703. PubMed ID: 34412187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short-term efficacy of transvaginal specimen extraction for right colon cancer based on propensity score matching: A retrospective cohort study.
    Li XW; Wang CY; Zhang JJ; Ge Z; Lin XH; Hu JH
    Int J Surg; 2019 Dec; 72():102-108. PubMed ID: 31362128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled study with 3-year follow-up results].
    Chen ZZ; Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yuan SS; Yan F; Wang ZF; Liu GY; Qiu XF; Cai JC
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jul; 25(7):604-611. PubMed ID: 35844123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term oncologic outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment of rectal cancer: a propensity-score matching study.
    Li Z; Xiong H; Qiao T; Jiao S; Zhu Y; Wang G; Wang X; Tang Q
    BMC Surg; 2022 Jul; 22(1):286. PubMed ID: 35879754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.
    Feng Q; Ng SSM; Zhang Z; Lin S; Niu Z; Wei Y; He G; Chang W; Zhu D; Xu J
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 124(4):607-618. PubMed ID: 34076898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study.
    Tang Q; Zhu Y; Xiong H; Sheng X; Hu Z; Hu H; Huang R; Zhang Q; Yuan Z; Xie L; Gao Z; Wang Y; Wang G; Wang X
    Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():2247-2257. PubMed ID: 33727861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short- and long-term outcomes as well as anal function of transanal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal cancer resection: a retrospective study with over 5-year follow-up.
    Zhang J; Li W; Li Y; Amin B; Zhang N; Sun Z; Zhu B
    Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2022 Jun; 17(2):344-351. PubMed ID: 35707343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advancing mid-rectal cancer surgery: Unveiling the potential of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in comparison to conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection.
    Muhammad S; Jiang Z; Fan T; Tang Q; Hai Y; Ehsan SBE; Bilal M; Zubayraeva AA; Gao Y; He J
    Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2024 May; 7(5):e2003. PubMed ID: 38703000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Propensity score matching-based analysis of short-term outcomes of Laparoscopic-assisted Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction for left colorectal cancer radical resection].
    Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Qiu XF; Yan F; Yuan SS; Cai JC
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 May; 96(20):1578-81. PubMed ID: 27266686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Short-term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction].
    Gao GM; Liu DN; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1124-1130. PubMed ID: 31874527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer.
    Ding Y; Li Z; Gao H; Cao Y; Jin W
    J BUON; 2019; 24(5):1817-1823. PubMed ID: 31786842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment effects of low rectal cancer.
    Zhu Y; Xiong H; Chen Y; Liu Z; Jiang Z; Huang R; Gao F; Zhang Q; Wang M; Jin Y; Qiao T; Ma T; Hu H; Wang X; Tang Q; Wang G
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):9338. PubMed ID: 33927293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Analysis of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery on 162 cases with rectal neoplasms].
    Zhou JJ; Li TG; Lei SL; Chen WD; Liu KJ; Liu B; Yao HL
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 32306607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of short-term outcomes of transrectal specimen extraction during laparoscopic sigmoid radical resection versus conventional laparoscopically assisted procedure].
    Xing J; Zhang C; Yang X; Wang H; Wang H; Yu E; Fu C
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 20(6):665-670. PubMed ID: 28643312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of short-term efficacy analysis of medium-rectal cancer surgery with robotic natural orifice specimen extraction and robotic transabdominal specimen extraction.
    Ye SP; Lu WJ; Liu DN; Yu HX; Wu C; Xu HC; Li TY
    BMC Surg; 2023 Nov; 23(1):336. PubMed ID: 37940918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with sigmoid colon/high rectal cancer.
    He Q; Huang J; Niu L; Zhai C
    J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 127(7):1160-1166. PubMed ID: 36913188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in short-terms outcomes of middle rectal cancer.
    Ye SP; Yu HX; Liu DN; Lu WJ; Wu C; Xu HC; Li TY
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):196. PubMed ID: 37403084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method
    Tao F; Liu DN; He PH; Luo X; Xu CY; Li TY; Duan JY
    World J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Oct; 15(10):2142-2153. PubMed ID: 37969697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating short-term and survival outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer: A single-centre retrospective study.
    Zhao F; Zhao W; Xiao T; Wang Z; Huang F; Xing W; Liu Q
    Front Surg; 2023; 10():1078316. PubMed ID: 36911615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.