115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30706474)
1. The WIG (weighted individual and group) shrinkage estimator.
Riley S; McDowell JJ
J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Mar; 111(2):166-182. PubMed ID: 30706474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimations by minimum relative entropy method.
Amisaki T; Eguchi S
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1995 Oct; 23(5):479-94. PubMed ID: 8656343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robust estimation for linear panel data models.
Hamiye Beyaztas B; Bandyopadhyay S
Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(29):4421-4438. PubMed ID: 32901960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fuzzy least squares for identification of individual pharmacokinetic parameters.
Seng KY; Nestorov I; Vicini P
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Dec; 56(12):2796-805. PubMed ID: 19695981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linear parameter estimation of rational biokinetic functions.
Doeswijk TG; Keesman KJ
Water Res; 2009 Jan; 43(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 19004464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lasso adjustments of treatment effect estimates in randomized experiments.
Bloniarz A; Liu H; Zhang CH; Sekhon JS; Yu B
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jul; 113(27):7383-90. PubMed ID: 27382153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neither fixed nor random: weighted least squares meta-analysis.
Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
Stat Med; 2015 Jun; 34(13):2116-27. PubMed ID: 25809462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Instrumental variable estimation of reinforcer effects.
Jensen G
J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Mar; 111(2):359-368. PubMed ID: 30677136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Traction force microscopy with optimized regularization and automated Bayesian parameter selection for comparing cells.
Huang Y; Schell C; Huber TB; Şimşek AN; Hersch N; Merkel R; Gompper G; Sabass B
Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):539. PubMed ID: 30679578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of objective functions for estimation of kinetic parameters.
Muzic RF; Christian BT
Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):342-53. PubMed ID: 16532939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting individual brain functional connectivity using a Bayesian hierarchical model.
Dai T; Guo Y;
Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():772-787. PubMed ID: 27915121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regularized estimation in the accelerated failure time model with high-dimensional covariates.
Huang J; Ma S; Xie H
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):813-20. PubMed ID: 16984324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gain in efficiency from using generalized least squares in the Haseman-Elston test.
Single RM; Finch SJ
Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):889-94. PubMed ID: 8788027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-Parameter Modified Ridge-Type M-Estimator for Linear Regression Model.
Lukman AF; Ayinde K; Golam Kibria BM; Jegede SL
ScientificWorldJournal; 2020; 2020():3192852. PubMed ID: 32508537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dense motion estimation using regularization constraints on local parametric models.
Patras I; Worring M; van den Boomgaard R
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2004 Nov; 13(11):1432-43. PubMed ID: 15540453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wavelet-generalized least squares: a new BLU estimator of linear regression models with 1/f errors.
Fadili MJ; Bullmore ET
Neuroimage; 2002 Jan; 15(1):217-32. PubMed ID: 11771991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of Matching Methods as Compared With Unmatched Ordinary Least Squares Regression Under Constant Effects.
Vable AM; Kiang MV; Glymour MM; Rigdon J; Drabo EF; Basu S
Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 188(7):1345-1354. PubMed ID: 30995301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neither fixed nor random: weighted least squares meta-regression.
Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):19-42. PubMed ID: 27322495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Joint Adaptive Mean-Variance Regularization and Variance Stabilization of High Dimensional Data.
Dazard JE; Rao JS
Comput Stat Data Anal; 2012 Jul; 56(7):2317-2333. PubMed ID: 22711950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data.
Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 22568535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
