173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30706960)
1. How confession characteristics impact juror perceptions of evidence in criminal trials.
Shifton JJ
Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):90-108. PubMed ID: 30706960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Defendant stereotypicality moderates the effect of confession evidence on judgments of guilt.
Smalarz L; Madon S; Turosak A
Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):355-368. PubMed ID: 29939062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of confession evidence on jurors' verdict decisions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mindthoff A; Ferreira PA; Meissner CA
Law Hum Behav; 2024 Jun; 48(3):163-181. PubMed ID: 38949764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One Country, Two Cultures: Are Hong Kong Mock Jurors "Mainlandized" by the Predominant Chinese Criminal Justice Concept of Confession?
Hui CY; Lo TW
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2015 Sep; 59(10):1104-24. PubMed ID: 24670371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revisiting the False Confession Problem.
Alvarez-Toro V; Lopez-Morales CA
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 29618534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mock jurors' perceptions and case decisions following a juvenile interrogation: Investigating the roles of interested adults and confession type.
Mindthoff A; Malloy LC; Höhs JM
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 32496092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interrogations, confessions, and adolescent offenders' perceptions of the legal system.
Arndorfer A; Malloy LC; Cauffman E
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Oct; 39(5):503-13. PubMed ID: 26011040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Videotaped interrogations and confessions: a simple change in camera perspective alters verdicts in simulated trials.
Lassiter GD; Geers AL; Handley IM; Weiland PE; Munhall PJ
J Appl Psychol; 2002 Oct; 87(5):867-74. PubMed ID: 12395811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Juror sensitivity to false confession risk factors: Dispositional vs. situational attributions for a confession.
Woestehoff SA; Meissner CA
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):564-79. PubMed ID: 27227274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the power of confession evidence: an experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis.
Kassin SM; Neumann K
Law Hum Behav; 1997 Oct; 21(5):469-84. PubMed ID: 9374602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Psychology of Confessions: A Review of the Literature and Issues.
Kassin SM; Gudjonsson GH
Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2004 Nov; 5(2):33-67. PubMed ID: 26158993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The interdependence of perceived confession voluntariness and case evidence.
Greenspan R; Scurich N
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):650-659. PubMed ID: 27149289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. False-evidence ploys and interrogations: mock jurors' perceptions of false-evidence ploy type, deception, coercion, and justification.
Forrest KD; Woody WD; Brady SE; Batterman KC; Stastny BJ; Bruns JA
Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):342-64. PubMed ID: 22315159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do laypeople recognize youth as a risk factor for false confession? A test of the 'common sense' hypothesis.
Grove LJ; Kukucka J
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(2):185-205. PubMed ID: 34712091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Will jurors correct for evidence interdependence in their verdicts? It depends.
Pate M; Kienzle M; Vogler V
Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 30266044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Waiving goodbye to youth: Jurors perceive transferred juveniles differently from adults but render similar verdicts.
Katzman J; Fessinger MB; Bornstein BH; McWilliams K
Behav Sci Law; 2022 Nov; 40(6):835-858. PubMed ID: 36226574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The prevalence of false confessions in experimental laboratory simulations: A meta-analysis.
Stewart JM; Woody WD; Pulos S
Behav Sci Law; 2018 Jan; 36(1):12-31. PubMed ID: 29460441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An explanation for camera perspective bias in voluntariness judgment for video-recorded confession: Suggestion of cognitive frame.
Park K; Pyo J
Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):184-94. PubMed ID: 22667808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Secondary confessions: the influence (or lack thereof) of incentive size and scientific expert testimony on jurors' perceptions of informant testimony.
Maeder EM; Pica E
Law Hum Behav; 2014 Dec; 38(6):560-8. PubMed ID: 25180762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
