173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30706960)
21. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence.
Najdowski CJ; Bottoms BL; Vargas MC
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):401-30. PubMed ID: 19391102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. "I Did It, But Not Like That": Effects of Factually Incorrect Confessions on Juror Judgments.
Jones EE; Bandy AD; Palmer PG
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(4):553-570. PubMed ID: 31984096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Research-Based Instructions Induce Sensitivity to Confession Evidence.
Jones AM; Penrod S
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(2):257-272. PubMed ID: 31984019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A national epidemiological study investigating risk factors for police interrogation and false confession among juveniles and young persons.
Gudjonsson GH; Sigurdsson JF; Sigfusdottir ID; Asgeirsdottir BB; González RA; Young S
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):359-67. PubMed ID: 26537245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interrogations, confessions, and guilty pleas among serious adolescent offenders.
Malloy LC; Shulman EP; Cauffman E
Law Hum Behav; 2014 Apr; 38(2):181-93. PubMed ID: 24127891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of expert testimony and interrogation tactics on perceptions of confessions.
Moffa MS; Platania J
Psychol Rep; 2007 Apr; 100(2):563-70. PubMed ID: 17564233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions?
Leo RA; Liu B
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):381-99. PubMed ID: 19405041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence?
Henderson KS; Levett LM
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):638-649. PubMed ID: 27243361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors' verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence.
Woody WD; Forrest KD
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):333-60. PubMed ID: 19405020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Short-sighted confession decisions: the role of uncertain and delayed consequences.
Yang Y; Madon S; Guyll M
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 25133917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. On the presumption of evidentiary independence: can confessions corrupt eyewitness identifications?
Hasel LE; Kassin SM
Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 19152544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Incentives increase the rate of false but not true secondary confessions from informants with an allegiance to a suspect.
Swanner JK; Beike DR
Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):418-28. PubMed ID: 20107880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Facts only the perpetrator could have known? A study of contamination in mock crime interrogations.
Alceste F; Jones KA; Kassin SM
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 44(2):128-142. PubMed ID: 32162950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Inside interrogation: the lie, the bluff, and false confessions.
Perillo JT; Kassin SM
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 20734122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A survey of people's attitudes and beliefs about false confessions.
Henkel LA; Coffman KA; Dailey EM
Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(5):555-84. PubMed ID: 18788081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A true denial or a false confession? Assessing veracity of suspects' statements using MASAM and SVA.
Wojciechowski BW; Gräns M; Lidén M
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198211. PubMed ID: 29856813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Snitching, lies and computer crashes: an experimental investigation of secondary confessions.
Swanner JK; Beike DR; Cole AT
Law Hum Behav; 2010 Feb; 34(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 19277855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Suspect confession of child sexual abuse to investigators.
Lippert T; Cross TP; Jones L; Walsh W
Child Maltreat; 2010 May; 15(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 20410024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The interrogation decision-making model: A general theoretical framework for confessions.
Yang Y; Guyll M; Madon S
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 27762573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
