These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3070764)
1. The Nottingham Health Profile: an analysis of its sensitivity in differentiating illness groups. Jenkinson C; Fitzpatrick R; Argyle M Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(12):1411-4. PubMed ID: 3070764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Nottingham Health Profile. Carr-Hill RA; Kind P Soc Sci Med; 1989; 28(8):885. PubMed ID: 2705022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of health status in patients with chronic illness: comparison of the Nottingham health profile and the general health questionnaire. Jenkinson C; Fitzpatrick R Fam Pract; 1990 Jun; 7(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 2369979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health status and mood state in a migraine sample. Jenkinson C Int J Soc Psychiatry; 1990; 36(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 2354885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Nottingham health profile: a useful tool for epidemiologists? Kind P; Carr-Hill R Soc Sci Med; 1987; 25(8):905-10. PubMed ID: 3686119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of two multidimensional measures of health status: the Nottingham Health Profile and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. VanderZee KI; Sanderman R; Heyink J Qual Life Res; 1996 Feb; 5(1):165-74. PubMed ID: 8901380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the French version of the arthritis impact measurement scales 2 and comparison with the french version of the Nottingham Health Profile. "Quality of Life in Rheumatology" Task Force. Pouchot J; Guillemin F; Coste J; Brégeon C; Sany J Rev Rhum Engl Ed; 1996 Jun; 63(6):389-404. PubMed ID: 8817749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures. Fitzpatrick R; Ziebland S; Jenkinson C; Mowat A; Mowat A Qual Health Care; 1992 Jun; 1(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 10136848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity of the Nottingham Health Profile in a Finnish out-patient population with rheumatoid arthritis. Uutela T; Hakala M; Kautiainen H Rheumatology (Oxford); 2003 Jul; 42(7):841-5. PubMed ID: 12759465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. Hunt SM; McKenna SP; McEwen J; Backett EM; Williams J; Papp E J Epidemiol Community Health; 1980 Dec; 34(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 7241028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. Hunt SM; McEwen J; McKenna SP J R Coll Gen Pract; 1985 Apr; 35(273):185-8. PubMed ID: 3989783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Nottingham Health Profile in rheumatoid arthritis: correlation with other health status measurements and clinical variables. Sivas F; Erçin O; Tanyolaç O; Barça N; Aydoğ S; Ozoran K Rheumatol Int; 2004 Jul; 24(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 12942312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of two survey measures of health status. Leavey R; Wilkin D Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 3175710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relative importance of musculoskeletal disorders as a cause of chronic health problems, disability, and health care utilization: findings from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey. Badley EM; Rasooly I; Webster GK J Rheumatol; 1994 Mar; 21(3):505-14. PubMed ID: 8006895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Generic health instruments do not comprehensively capture patient perceived improvement in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Vaile JH; Mathers DM; Ramos-Remus C; Russell AS J Rheumatol; 1999 May; 26(5):1163-6. PubMed ID: 10332984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of psychosocial factors in explaining socio-economic differences in mobility decline in a chronically ill population: results from the GLOBE study. Koster A; Bosma H; van Lenthe FJ; Kempen GI; Mackenbach JP; van Eijk JT Soc Sci Med; 2005 Jul; 61(1):123-32. PubMed ID: 15847967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Generic health status measures are unsuitable for measuring health status in severely disabled people. Kersten P; Mullee MA; Smith JA; McLellan L; George S Clin Rehabil; 1999 Jun; 13(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 10392649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nottingham health profile questionnaire incorporates important aspects of the patient perspective into outcome assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. Uutela T; Kautiainen H; Hakala M Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2008; 26(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 18328145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Community-health needs assessment: use of the Nottingham health profile in an Australian study. Baum FE; Cooke RD Med J Aust; 1989 May; 150(10):581, 584, 587-90. PubMed ID: 2716566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Weights for scoring the quality of well-being instrument among rheumatoid arthritics. A comparison to general population weights. Balaban DJ; Sagi PC; Goldfarb NI; Nettler S Med Care; 1986 Nov; 24(11):973-80. PubMed ID: 3773579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]