These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Predicting compositions of microbial communities from stoichiometric models with applications for the biogas process. Koch S; Benndorf D; Fronk K; Reichl U; Klamt S Biotechnol Biofuels; 2016; 9():17. PubMed ID: 26807149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Designing microbial communities to maximize the thermodynamic driving force for the production of chemicals. Bekiaris PS; Klamt S PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jun; 17(6):e1009093. PubMed ID: 34129600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inhibitory Effect of Coumarin on Syntrophic Fatty Acid-Oxidizing and Methanogenic Cultures and Biogas Reactor Microbiomes. Popp D; Plugge CM; Kleinsteuber S; Harms H; Sträuber H Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Jul; 83(13):. PubMed ID: 28432098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample prefractionation with liquid isoelectric focusing enables in depth microbial metaproteome analysis of mesophilic and thermophilic biogas plants. Kohrs F; Heyer R; Magnussen A; Benndorf D; Muth T; Behne A; Rapp E; Kausmann R; Heiermann M; Klocke M; Reichl U Anaerobe; 2014 Oct; 29():59-67. PubMed ID: 24309213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of substrate overloading on archaeal populations in anaerobic digestion of animal waste. Chen S; Zamudio Cañas EM; Zhang Y; Zhu Z; He Q J Appl Microbiol; 2012 Dec; 113(6):1371-9. PubMed ID: 22950539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of various feedstocks on isotope fractionation of biogas and microbial community structure during anaerobic digestion. Lv Z; Chen Z; Chen X; Liang J; Jiang J; Loake GJ Waste Manag; 2019 Feb; 84():211-219. PubMed ID: 30691895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A gap-filling algorithm for prediction of metabolic interactions in microbial communities. Giannari D; Ho CH; Mahadevan R PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Nov; 17(11):e1009060. PubMed ID: 34723959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review. Bal AS; Dhagat NN Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Augmenting Biogas Process Modeling by Resolving Intracellular Metabolic Activity. Weinrich S; Koch S; Bonk F; Popp D; Benndorf D; Klamt S; Centler F Front Microbiol; 2019; 10():1095. PubMed ID: 31156601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Co-digestion of organic and mineral wastes for enhanced biogas production: Reactor performance and evolution of microbial community and function. Shamurad B; Gray N; Petropoulos E; Tabraiz S; Acharya K; Quintela-Baluja M; Sallis P Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():313-325. PubMed ID: 31109531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling interspecific competition of the microbial community during anaerobic digestion based on cellular automata and ADM1. Zhang M; Shi E; Li Y Water Sci Technol; 2021 May; 83(9):2087-2099. PubMed ID: 33989178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. mcrA Gene abundance correlates with hydrogenotrophic methane production rates in full-scale anaerobic waste treatment systems. Morris RL; Tale VP; Mathai PP; Zitomer DH; Maki JS Lett Appl Microbiol; 2016 Feb; 62(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 26509245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ammonia and temperature determine potential clustering in the anaerobic digestion microbiome. De Vrieze J; Saunders AM; He Y; Fang J; Nielsen PH; Verstraete W; Boon N Water Res; 2015 May; 75():312-23. PubMed ID: 25819618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reactor performances and microbial communities of biogas reactors: effects of inoculum sources. Han S; Liu Y; Zhang S; Luo G Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Jan; 100(2):987-95. PubMed ID: 26476649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic approach re-analyzing the effects of temperature disturbance on the microbial community of mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Shaw GT; Weng CY; Chen CY; Weng FC; Wang D Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):6560. PubMed ID: 31024021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High variations of methanogenic microorganisms drive full-scale anaerobic digestion process. Zhang Q; Wang M; Ma X; Gao Q; Wang T; Shi X; Zhou J; Zuo J; Yang Y Environ Int; 2019 May; 126():543-551. PubMed ID: 30852441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The full-scale anaerobic digestion microbiome is represented by specific marker populations. De Vrieze J; Raport L; Roume H; Vilchez-Vargas R; Jáuregui R; Pieper DH; Boon N Water Res; 2016 Nov; 104():101-110. PubMed ID: 27522020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A hybrid model of anaerobic E. coli GJT001: combination of elementary flux modes and cybernetic variables. Kim JI; Varner JD; Ramkrishna D Biotechnol Prog; 2008; 24(5):993-1006. PubMed ID: 19194908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]