These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30708095)

  • 1. The conventional gait model, an open-source implementation that reproduces the past but prepares for the future.
    Leboeuf F; Baker R; Barré A; Reay J; Jones R; Sangeux M
    Gait Posture; 2019 Jan; 69():126-129. PubMed ID: 30708095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The conventional gait model, an open-source implementation that reproduces the past but prepares for the future.
    Leboeuf F; Baker R; Barré A; Reay J; Jones R; Sangeux M
    Gait Posture; 2019 Mar; 69():235-241. PubMed ID: 31027876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of subject measurement error on joint kinematics in the conventional gait model: Insights from the open-source pyCGM tool using high performance computing methods.
    Schwartz M; Dixon PC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0189984. PubMed ID: 29293565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect on conventional gait model kinematics and kinetics of hip joint centre equations in adult healthy gait.
    Leboeuf F; Reay J; Jones R; Sangeux M
    J Biomech; 2019 Apr; 87():167-171. PubMed ID: 30808499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified conventional gait model versus cluster tracking: Test-retest reliability, agreement and impact of inverse kinematics with joint constraints on kinematic and kinetic data.
    Mentiplay BF; Clark RA
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():75-83. PubMed ID: 29879631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wand-mounted lateral markers are less prone to misplacement and soft-tissue artefacts than skin-mounted markers when using the conventional gait model.
    Leboeuf F; Sangeux M
    Gait Posture; 2023 Feb; 100():243-246. PubMed ID: 36640598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gait patterns in children with limb length discrepancy.
    Aiona M; Do KP; Emara K; Dorociak R; Pierce R
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2015; 35(3):280-4. PubMed ID: 25075889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Dynamic knee valgus" - Are we measuring what we think we're measuring? An evaluation of static and functional knee calibration methods for application in gait and clinical screening tests of the overhead squat and hurdle step.
    Philp F; Leboeuf F; Pandyan A; Stewart C
    Gait Posture; 2019 May; 70():298-304. PubMed ID: 30925354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Between-day reliability and minimum detectable change of the Conventional Gait Model 2 and Plug-in Gait Model during running.
    Okahisa T; Matsuura T; Tomonari K; Komatsu K; Yokoyama K; Iwase J; Yamada M; Sairyo K
    Gait Posture; 2023 Feb; 100():171-178. PubMed ID: 36563589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of knee marker misplacement on gait kinematics of children with cerebral palsy using the Conventional Gait Model-A sensitivity study.
    Fonseca M; Gasparutto X; Leboeuf F; Dumas R; Armand S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232064. PubMed ID: 32330162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computation of hip rotation kinematics retrospectively using functional knee calibration during gait.
    Sangeux M
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():171-176. PubMed ID: 29763812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modified conventional gait model vs. Six degrees of freedom model: A comparison of lower limb kinematics and associated error.
    Langley B; Jones A; Board T; Greig M
    Gait Posture; 2021 Sep; 89():1-6. PubMed ID: 34214865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model.
    Kainz H; Schwartz MH
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jul; 88():1-9. PubMed ID: 33933913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defining the medial-lateral axis of an anatomical femur coordinate system using freehand 3D ultrasound imaging.
    Passmore E; Sangeux M
    Gait Posture; 2016 Mar; 45():211-6. PubMed ID: 26979908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of functional calibration methods on gait kinematics in adolescents with idiopathic rotational deformity of the femur.
    Boekesteijn RJ; van de Ven MPF; Wilders LM; Bisseling P; Groen BE; Smulders K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2023 Jul; 107():106028. PubMed ID: 37331152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are changes in radiological leg alignment and femoral parameters after total hip replacement responsible for joint loading during gait?
    van Drongelen S; Kaldowski H; Tarhan T; Assi A; Meurer A; Stief F
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Nov; 20(1):526. PubMed ID: 31707985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of knee marker placement error on evaluation of gait kinematic parameters.
    Szczerbik E; Kalinowska M
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2011; 13(3):43-6. PubMed ID: 22098124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are we overestimating internal rotation gait by conventional modelling?
    Musagara AR; Salami F; Oelmaier H; Götze M; Wolf SI
    Gait Posture; 2023 Jun; 103():57-61. PubMed ID: 37116302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method to calculate the centre of the ankle joint: a comparison with the Vicon Plug-in-Gait model.
    Nair SP; Gibbs S; Arnold G; Abboud R; Wang W
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2010 Jul; 25(6):582-7. PubMed ID: 20388578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the use of knee functional calibration to determine the medio-lateral axis of the femur in gait analysis: Comparison with EOS biplanar radiographs as reference.
    Sauret C; Pillet H; Skalli W; Sangeux M
    Gait Posture; 2016 Oct; 50():180-184. PubMed ID: 27632062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.