236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30708365)
1. Regularised patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on proton radiographic images.
Krah N; Patera V; Rit S; Schiavi A; Rinaldi I
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065008. PubMed ID: 30708365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pre-treatment patient-specific stopping power by combining list-mode proton radiography and x-ray CT.
Collins-Fekete CA; Brousmiche S; Hansen DC; Beaulieu L; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):6836-6852. PubMed ID: 28657550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient-specific CT calibration based on ion radiography for different detector configurations in
Gianoli C; Göppel M; Meyer S; Palaniappan P; Rädler M; Kamp F; Belka C; Riboldi M; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245014. PubMed ID: 32629442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monte Carlo proton dose calculations using a radiotherapy specific dual-energy CT scanner for tissue segmentation and range assessment.
Almeida IP; Schyns LEJR; Vaniqui A; van der Heyden B; Dedes G; Resch AF; Kamp F; Zindler JD; Parodi K; Landry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(11):115008. PubMed ID: 29616662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on single-detector proton radiography.
Doolan PJ; Testa M; Sharp G; Bentefour EH; Royle G; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(5):1901-17. PubMed ID: 25668437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of low-dose proton CT image registration for pretreatment alignment verification in reference to planning proton CT.
Cassetta R; Piersimoni P; Riboldi M; Giacometti V; Bashkirov V; Baroni G; Ordonez C; Coutrakon G; Schulte R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):83-90. PubMed ID: 30933433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of beam purity and scanner complexity on proton CT accuracy.
Piersimoni P; Ramos-Méndez J; Geoghegan T; Bashkirov VA; Schulte RW; Faddegon BA
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):284-298. PubMed ID: 28066887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo comparison of x-ray and proton CT for range calculations of proton therapy beams.
Arbor N; Dauvergne D; Dedes G; Létang JM; Parodi K; Quiñones CT; Testa E; Rit S
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(19):7585-99. PubMed ID: 26378805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images.
Hudobivnik N; Schwarz F; Johnson T; Agolli L; Dedes G; Tessonnier T; Verhaegen F; Thieke C; Belka C; Sommer WH; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):495. PubMed ID: 26745942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental comparison of proton CT and dual energy x-ray CT for relative stopping power estimation in proton therapy.
Dedes G; Dickmann J; Niepel K; Wesp P; Johnson RP; Pankuch M; Bashkirov V; Rit S; Volz L; Schulte RW; Landry G; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(16):165002. PubMed ID: 31220814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical Note: Relative proton stopping power estimation from virtual monoenergetic images reconstructed from dual-layer computed tomography.
Landry G; Dörringer F; Si-Mohamed S; Douek P; Abascal JFPJ; Peyrin F; Almeida IP; Verhaegen F; Rinaldi I; Parodi K; Rit S
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1821-1828. PubMed ID: 30695108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Helium CT: Monte Carlo simulation results for an ideal source and detector with comparison to proton CT.
Piersimoni P; Faddegon BA; Méndez JR; Schulte RW; Volz L; Seco J
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3264-3274. PubMed ID: 29727481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric accuracy and radiobiological implications of ion computed tomography for proton therapy treatment planning.
Meyer S; Kamp F; Tessonnier T; Mairani A; Belka C; Carlson DJ; Gianoli C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(12):125008. PubMed ID: 30870831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate proton treatment planning for pencil beam crossing titanium fixation implants.
Righetto R; Clemens LP; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Algranati C; Tommasino F; Dionisi F; Cianchetti M; Schwarz M; Farace P
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():28-38. PubMed ID: 31954210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simulation study on proton computed tomography (CT) stopping power accuracy using dual energy CT scans as benchmark.
Hansen DC; Seco J; Sørensen TS; Petersen JB; Wildberger JE; Verhaegen F; Landry G
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1638-42. PubMed ID: 26219959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison study between single- and dual-energy CT density extraction methods for neurological proton monte carlo treatment planning.
van der Heyden B; Almeida IP; Vilches-Freixas G; Van Beveren C; Vaniqui A; Ares C; Terhaag K; Fonseca GP; Eekers DBP; Verhaegen F
Acta Oncol; 2020 Feb; 59(2):171-179. PubMed ID: 31646923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental comparison of relative stopping power evaluation between proton CT and x-ray CT for pre-clinical proton irradiation studies of small animals.
Terakawa A; Hosokawa H; Nogami M; Hitomi K; Ishii K
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 68(9):. PubMed ID: 37011626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
Zhu J; Penfold SN
Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined influence of CT random noise and HU-RSP calibration curve nonlinearities on proton range systematic errors.
Brousmiche S; Souris K; de Xivry JO; Lee JA; Macq B; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8226-8245. PubMed ID: 28817383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of proton stopping power estimation of silicone breast implants with single and dual-energy CT calibration techniques.
Chacko MS; Grewal HS; Wu D; Sonnad JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 22(9):159-170. PubMed ID: 34275175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
