239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30708365)
21. Comparative Monte Carlo study on the performance of integration- and list-mode detector configurations for carbon ion computed tomography.
Meyer S; Gianoli C; Magallanes L; Kopp B; Tessonnier T; Landry G; Dedes G; Voss B; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(3):1096-1112. PubMed ID: 28092630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cone-beam CT-derived relative stopping power map generation via deep learning for proton radiotherapy.
Harms J; Lei Y; Wang T; McDonald M; Ghavidel B; Stokes W; Curran WJ; Zhou J; Liu T; Yang X
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):4416-4427. PubMed ID: 32579710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of beam-hardening corrections on proton relative stopping power estimates from single- and dual-energy CT.
Chacko MS; Wu D; Grewal HS; Sonnad JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13711. PubMed ID: 35816460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The precision of proton range calculations in proton radiotherapy treatment planning: experimental verification of the relation between CT-HU and proton stopping power.
Schaffner B; Pedroni E
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Jun; 43(6):1579-92. PubMed ID: 9651027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Improved calibration of mass stopping power in low density tissue for a proton pencil beam algorithm.
Warren DR; Partridge M; Hill MA; Peach K
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(11):4243-61. PubMed ID: 25973866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Investigating CT to CBCT image registration for head and neck proton therapy as a tool for daily dose recalculation.
Landry G; Nijhuis R; Dedes G; Handrack J; Thieke C; Janssens G; Orban de Xivry J; Reiner M; Kamp F; Wilkens JJ; Paganelli C; Riboldi M; Baroni G; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Parodi K
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1354-66. PubMed ID: 25735290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Toward a new treatment planning approach accounting for in vivo proton range verification.
Tian L; Landry G; Dedes G; Kamp F; Pinto M; Niepel K; Belka C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215025. PubMed ID: 30375361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimization and performance study of a proton CT system for pre-clinical small animal imaging.
Meyer S; Bortfeldt J; Lämmer P; Englbrecht FS; Pinto M; Schnürle K; Würl M; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Aug; 65(15):155008. PubMed ID: 32311690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The impact of uncertainties in the CT conversion algorithm when predicting proton beam ranges in patients from dose and PET-activity distributions.
España S; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7557-71. PubMed ID: 21098912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Feasibility study of a proton CT system based on 4D-tracking and residual energy determination via time-of-flight.
Ulrich-Pur F; Bergauer T; Burker A; Hirtl A; Irmler C; Kaser S; Pitters F; Rit S
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Apr; 67(9):. PubMed ID: 35354129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A new treatment planning approach accounting for prompt gamma range verification and interfractional anatomical changes.
Tian L; Landry G; Dedes G; Pinto M; Kamp F; Belka C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 65(9):095005. PubMed ID: 32135530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Experimental realization of dynamic fluence field optimization for proton computed tomography.
Dickmann J; Sarosiek C; Rykalin V; Pankuch M; Rit S; Detrich N; Coutrakon G; Johnson RP; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Landry G; Dedes G
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(19):195001. PubMed ID: 32575084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Proton dose calculation based on converting dual-energy CT data to stopping power ratio (DEEDZ-SPR): a beam-hardening assessment.
Tanaka S; Noto Y; Utsunomiya S; Yoshimura T; Matsuura T; Saito M
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235046. PubMed ID: 33336651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Implementation and experimental evaluation of Mega-voltage fan-beam CT using a linear accelerator.
Gong H; Tao S; Gagneur JD; Liu W; Shen J; McCollough CH; Hu Y; Leng S
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):139. PubMed ID: 34321029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Deformable image registration of the treatment planning CT with proton radiographies in perspective of adaptive proton therapy.
Palaniappan P; Meyer S; Kamp F; Belka C; Riboldi M; Parodi K; Gianoli C
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(4):045008. PubMed ID: 32365335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Proton range verification using a range probe: definition of concept and initial analysis.
Mumot M; Algranati C; Hartmann M; Schippers JM; Hug E; Lomax AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4771-82. PubMed ID: 20679697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validation of the proton range accuracy and optimization of CT calibration curves utilizing range probing.
Meijers A; Free J; Wagenaar D; Deffet S; Knopf AC; Langendijk JA; Both S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb; 65(3):03NT02. PubMed ID: 31896099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of Hounsfield number conversion on CT based proton Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Jiang H; Seco J; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1439-49. PubMed ID: 17500475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Feasibility of energy-resolved dose imaging technique in pencil beam scanning mode.
Alaka BG; Bentefour EH; Chirvase C; Samuel D; Teo BK
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Sep; 6(6):. PubMed ID: 35102004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Automation and uncertainty analysis of a method for in-vivo range verification in particle therapy.
Frey K; Unholtz D; Bauer J; Debus J; Min CH; Bortfeld T; Paganetti H; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(19):5903-19. PubMed ID: 25211629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
