These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30709581)

  • 1. Surgical technique to achieve high durability of flexible ureteroscopes: A single hospital experience.
    Lin CC; Wu LS; Huang SS; Lin CF; Chen WH; Wu CT
    Biomed J; 2018 Dec; 41(6):385-390. PubMed ID: 30709581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Independent analysis of Olympus flexible ureteroscope repairs.
    Canales BK; Gleason JM; Hicks N; Monga M
    Urology; 2007 Jul; 70(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17656198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Durability of current generation flexible ureteroscopes: the experience from a high-volume centre.
    Vaddi CM; Ramakrishna P; Ganesan S; Swamy S; Anandan H; Babu M
    Cent European J Urol; 2022; 75(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 35937666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope.
    Somani BK; Al-Qahtani SM; de Medina SD; Traxer O
    Urology; 2013 Nov; 82(5):1017-9. PubMed ID: 24001703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
    Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
    BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the durability of digital flexible ureteroscopes.
    Karaolides T; Bach C; Kachrilas S; Goyal A; Masood J; Buchholz N
    Urology; 2013 Apr; 81(4):717-22. PubMed ID: 23465156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7.
    Kim DH; Shin JH; Choi SY; You D; Kim CS; Park HK
    Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Sep; 59(5):328-334. PubMed ID: 30182078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons.
    Carey RI; Martin CJ; Knego JR
    Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 24837456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.
    Kramolowsky E; McDowell Z; Moore B; Booth B; Wood N
    J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 26542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physical properties of flexible ureteroscopes: implications for clinical practice.
    Monga M; Anderson KJ; Durfee W
    J Endourol; 2004 Jun; 18(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 15253821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Flexible Ureteroscope Performance between Reusable and Single-Use Models.
    Bragaru M; Multescu R; Geavlete P; Popescu R; Geavlete B
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36769740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center.
    Carey RI; Gomez CS; Maurici G; Lynne CM; Leveillee RJ; Bird VG
    J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):607-10; discussion 610. PubMed ID: 16813899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr.
    Afane JS; Olweny EO; Bercowsky E; Sundaram CP; Dunn MD; Shalhav AL; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2000 Oct; 164(4):1164-8. PubMed ID: 10992358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-use
    Bragaru M; Multescu R; Georgescu D; Bulai C; Ene C; Popescu R; Geavlete P; Geavlete B
    J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 36873117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.
    Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R
    Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Steep Infundibulopelvic Angle as a New Risk Factor for Flexible Ureteroscope Damage and Complicated Postoperative Course.
    Ozimek T; Cordes J; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Gilbert N; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
    J Endourol; 2018 Jul; 32(7):597-602. PubMed ID: 29737199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes.
    Boylu U; Oommen M; Thomas R; Lee BR
    J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2347-51. PubMed ID: 19758626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Durability of Digital Flexible Ureteroscope in University Hospital and Ambulatory Surgical Center: Is It Time to Rethink?
    Banerjee I; Katz JE; Bhattu AS; Soodana NP; Deane LA; Marcovich R; Shah HN
    J Endourol; 2021 Mar; 35(3):289-295. PubMed ID: 32998577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which Flexible Ureteroscopes (Digital vs. Fiber-Optic) Can Easily Reach the Difficult Lower Pole Calices and Have Better End-Tip Deflection: In Vitro Study on K-Box. A PETRA Evaluation.
    Dragos LB; Somani BK; Sener ET; Buttice S; Proietti S; Ploumidis A; Iacoboaie CT; Doizi S; Traxer O
    J Endourol; 2017 Jul; 31(7):630-637. PubMed ID: 28478744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laser fibre, rather than the stone, may harm the scope: retrospective monocentric analysis of 26 pre- and intraoperative factors of flexible ureteroscope (fURS) damage.
    Ozimek T; Cordes J; Gilbert N; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
    World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):2035-2040. PubMed ID: 31659464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.