These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30711289)

  • 21. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life, Peri-Implant and Kinesiograph Parameters in Wearers of One-or Two-Implant Mandibular Overdentures.
    Policastro VB; Paleari AG; Leite ARP; Mendoza-Marin DO; Cassiano AFB; Shaddox LM; Compagnoni MA; Pero AC
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Aug; 28(7):757-765. PubMed ID: 29679427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of clip material and cross sections of the bar framework associated with vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-retained overdentures.
    dos Santos MB; Bacchi A; Correr-Sobrinho L; Consani RL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24392474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Single implant retained overdentures: Evaluation of effect of implant length and diameter on stress distribution by finite element analysis.
    Eraslan R; Yagci F; Esim E
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 33(4):348-357. PubMed ID: 37950537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of different implant designs on replacement of four teeth of the posterior free-end edentulism: Three-dimensional finite element analysis and clinic case validation.
    Ye Z; Ye H; Jiang Z; Wu S; Feng Z; Liu H; Wang X; Lan R; Lin X; Ding C; Zhang Q; Ding X; Wu L
    Ann Anat; 2023 Aug; 249():152111. PubMed ID: 37247761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior edentulism.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Apr; 29(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 11966968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Abutment-Bar Structure Connection Geometry: An Important Design Parameter for Implant-Supported Bar-Retained Overdentures With Cantilever Extension.
    Akgün G; Kayacan R
    J Oral Implantol; 2023 Jun; 49(3):330-339. PubMed ID: 36796061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Short Implants with Different Treatment Approaches in the Atrophic Mandible.
    Doganay O; Kilic E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(4):e69-e76. PubMed ID: 32724926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mechanical Stress Analysis of Different Configurations of the All-on-4 Concept in Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Study.
    Santana LCL; Guastaldi FPS; Idogava HT; Noritomi PY; De Foggi CC; Vaz LG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 33600526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical analysis of inclined and cantilever design with different implant framework materials in mandibular complete-arch implant restorations.
    Yu W; Li X; Ma X; Xu X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):783.e1-783.e10. PubMed ID: 35305832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
    J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study.
    Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A; Sevimay M; Soykan E; Unsal E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Feb; 91(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 14970760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biomechanical behavior of 2-implant- and single-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional or mini implants.
    Pisani MX; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF; Barão VAR; Kemmoku DT; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):421-430. PubMed ID: 29703669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Bone Heights and Attachment Types: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Unsal GS; Erbasar GNH; Aykent F; Ozyilmaz OY; Ozdogan MS
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 31536445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
    Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of clip materials on stress distribution to maxillary implant overdentures with bar attachments.
    Tanoue M; Kanazawa M; Takeshita S; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 26518988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of Cantilever Length and Implant Inclination on the Stress Distribution of Mandibular Prosthetic Restorations Constructed from Monolithic Zirconia Ceramic.
    Durkan R; Oyar P; Deste G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(1):121-129. PubMed ID: 31923295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.