These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30711981)

  • 1. Low-molecular-weight Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Is a Possible Biomarker for Predicting Postoperative Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer With Negative Surgical Margins.
    Kurose H; Ueda K; Kondo R; Ogasawara S; Kusano H; Sanada S; Naito Y; Akiba J; Kakuma T; Igawa T; Yano H
    Anticancer Res; 2019 Feb; 39(2):957-964. PubMed ID: 30711981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Elevated Expression of EPHA2 Is Associated With Poor Prognosis After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer.
    Kurose H; Ueda K; Kondo R; Ogasawara S; Kusano H; Sanada S; Naito Y; Nakiri M; Nishihara K; Kakuma T; Akiba J; Igawa T; Yano H
    Anticancer Res; 2019 Nov; 39(11):6249-6257. PubMed ID: 31704854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
    Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence free survival after radical prostatectomy with positive surgical margins].
    Roux V; Eyraud R; Brureau L; Gourtaud G; Senechal C; Fofana M; Blanchet P
    Prog Urol; 2017; 27(8-9):467-473. PubMed ID: 28576421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence.
    Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL
    J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Hashimoto T; Nakashima J; Inoue R; Komori O; Yamaguchi Y; Kashima T; Satake N; Nakagami Y; Namiki K; Nagao T; Ohno Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 25(2):377-383. PubMed ID: 31673831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low-molecular-weight protein tyrosine phosphatase expression as a prognostic factor for men with metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer.
    Ohtaka M; Miyoshi Y; Kawahara T; Ohtake S; Yasui M; Uemura K; Yoneyama S; Hattori Y; Teranishi JI; Yokomizo Y; Uemura H; Miyamoto H; Yao M
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Oct; 35(10):607.e9-607.e14. PubMed ID: 28641939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
    Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prostate cancer biochemical recurrence rates after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Ginzburg S; Nevers T; Staff I; Tortora J; Champagne A; Kesler SS; Laudone VP; Wagner JR
    JSLS; 2012; 16(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 23318071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Carter HB; Peck HJ; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1277-80; discussion 1280-1. PubMed ID: 17698121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overexpression of Cdc20 in clinically localized prostate cancer: Relation to high Gleason score and biochemical recurrence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Mao Y; Li K; Lu L; Si-Tu J; Lu M; Gao X
    Cancer Biomark; 2016; 16(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 26889981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic Factors for Biochemical Recurrence More than 10 Years after Radical Prostatectomy.
    Liesenfeld L; Kron M; Gschwend JE; Herkommer K
    J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):143-148. PubMed ID: 27418452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implications of greater short-term PSA recurrence with laparoscopic as compared to retropubic radical prostatectomy for Japanese clinically localized prostate carcinomas.
    Akita H; Okamura T; Ando R; Nagata D; Naruyama H; Yamada Y; Naiki T; Yasui T; Tozawa K; Kohri K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):2959-61. PubMed ID: 22393971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of patients at risk for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with intra-operative frozen section.
    Tully KH; Schulmeyer M; Hanske J; Reike MJ; Brock M; Moritz R; Jütte H; Tannapfel A; von Bodman C; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ; Roghmann F
    BJU Int; 2021 Nov; 128(5):598-606. PubMed ID: 33961328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.