These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30712075)

  • 1. Association between the use of contact force-sensing catheters and cardiac tamponade in atrial fibrillation ablation.
    Liu N; Zhao Q; Li L; Zhang M; Huang J; Wei S; Wen S; Ruan Y; Guo X; Li S; Jiang C; Tang R; Sang C; Long D; Yu R; Bai R; Du X; Dong J; Ma C
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2019 Aug; 55(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 30712075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Atrial fibrillation ablation using very short duration 50 W ablations and contact force sensing catheters.
    Winkle RA; Moskovitz R; Hardwin Mead R; Engel G; Kong MH; Fleming W; Salcedo J; Patrawala RA; Tranter JH; Shai I
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Jun; 52(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29460232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation With or Without Contact Force Sensing.
    Hussein AA; Barakat AF; Saliba WI; Tarakji KG; Bassiouny M; Baranowski B; Tchou P; Bhargava M; Dresing T; Callahan T; Cantillon D; Kanj M; Lindsay BD; Wazni OM
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 May; 28(5):483-488. PubMed ID: 28185351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial.
    Natale A; Reddy VY; Monir G; Wilber DJ; Lindsay BD; McElderry HT; Kantipudi C; Mansour MC; Melby DP; Packer DL; Nakagawa H; Zhang B; Stagg RB; Boo LM; Marchlinski FE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Aug; 64(7):647-56. PubMed ID: 25125294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation.
    Squara F; Zhao A; Marijon E; Latcu DG; Providencia R; Di Giovanni G; Jauvert G; Jourda F; Chierchia GB; De Asmundis C; Ciconte G; Alonso C; Grimard C; Boveda S; Cauchemez B; Saoudi N; Brugada P; Albenque JP; Thomas O
    Europace; 2015 May; 17(5):718-24. PubMed ID: 25840289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation with contact force-sensing catheters.
    Black-Maier E; Pokorney SD; Barnett AS; Zeitler EP; Sun AY; Jackson KP; Bahnson TD; Daubert JP; Piccini JP
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Sep; 14(9):1328-1333. PubMed ID: 28416466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Macle L; Frame D; Gache LM; Monir G; Pollak SJ; Boo LM
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e023775. PubMed ID: 31189669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of a contact force-sensing ablation catheter with advanced catheter location significantly reduces fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Lee G; Hunter RJ; Lovell MJ; Finlay M; Ullah W; Baker V; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ
    Europace; 2016 Feb; 18(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 26318548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial impedance decrease as an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency ablation with force sensing catheters.
    Reichlin T; Knecht S; Lane C; Kühne M; Nof E; Chopra N; Tadros TM; Reddy VY; Schaer B; John RM; Osswald S; Stevenson WG; Sticherling C; Michaud GF
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Feb; 11(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 24177370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and long-term effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with a contact force-sensing catheter: real-world experience from a prospective, multicentre observational cohort registry.
    De Potter T; Van Herendael H; Balasubramaniam R; Wright M; Agarwal SC; Sanders P; Khaykin Y; Latcu DG; Maury P; Pani A; Hayes J; Kalman J; Nery P; Duncan E
    Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(FI_3):f410-f418. PubMed ID: 29315382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation.
    Matsuda H; Parwani AS; Attanasio P; Huemer M; Wutzler A; Blaschke F; Haverkamp W; Boldt LH
    Heart Vessels; 2016 Sep; 31(9):1544-52. PubMed ID: 26498938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis.
    Cardoso R; Mendirichaga R; Fernandes G; Healy C; Lambrakos LK; Viles-Gonzalez JF; Goldberger JJ; Mitrani RD
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1151-1159. PubMed ID: 27422848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of contact force technology on reducing the recurrence and major complications of atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhou X; Lv W; Zhang W; Ye Y; Li Y; Zhou Q; Xing Q; Zhang J; Lu Y; Zhang L; Wang H; Qin W; Tang B
    Anatol J Cardiol; 2017 Feb; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 28209944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of contact force and remote magnetic navigation on lesion formation for the ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Grossi S; Grassi F; Galleani L; Bianchi F; Conte MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2018 May; 41(5):450-458. PubMed ID: 29405314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of ablation index on the incidence of cardiac tamponade complicating pulmonary vein isolation.
    Reinsch N; Füting A; Buchholz J; Ruprecht U; Neven K
    Herz; 2021 Sep; 46(Suppl 2):228-234. PubMed ID: 33026484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The best of two worlds? Pulmonary vein isolation using a novel radiofrequency ablation catheter incorporating contact force sensing technology and 56-hole porous tip irrigation.
    Maurer T; Rottner L; Makimoto H; Reissmann B; Heeger CH; Lemes C; Fink T; Riedl J; Santoro F; Wohlmuth P; Volkmer M; Mathew S; Metzner A; Ouyang F; Kuck KH; Sohns C
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 107(11):1003-1012. PubMed ID: 29740700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using fiber optic-based contact force sensing.
    Mansour M; Lakkireddy D; Packer D; Day JD; Mahapatra S; Brunner K; Reddy V; Natale A
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Nov; 14(11):1631-1636. PubMed ID: 28734985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simultaneous pace-ablate during CARTO-guided pulmonary vein isolation with a contact-force sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter.
    Barbhaiya CR; Aizer A; Knotts R; Bernstein S; Park D; Holmes D; Chinitz LA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2019 Mar; 54(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 30264289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Economic impact of contact force sensing in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
    Mansour M; Reddy VY; Karst E; Heist EK; Packer DL; Dalal N; Agarwal R; Calkins H; Ruskin JN; Mahapatra S
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Nov; 30(11):2302-2309. PubMed ID: 31549456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving procedural and one-year outcome after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: the role of interlesion distance, ablation index, and contact force variability in the 'CLOSE'-protocol.
    Phlips T; Taghji P; El Haddad M; Wolf M; Knecht S; Vandekerckhove Y; Tavernier R; Duytschaever M
    Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(FI_3):f419-f427. PubMed ID: 29315411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.