These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30712521)

  • 1. Introducing a Crystallography-Mediated Reconstruction (CMR) Approach to Atom Probe Tomography.
    Day AC; Ceguerra AV; Ringer SP
    Microsc Microanal; 2019 Apr; 25(2):288-300. PubMed ID: 30712521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Crystallography-Mediated Reconstruction (CMR) Approach for Atom Probe Tomography: Solution for a Singleton Pole.
    Day AC; Breen AJ; Ringer SP
    Ultramicroscopy; 2021 May; 224():113262. PubMed ID: 33798817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the retrieval of crystallographic information from atom probe microscopy data via signal mapping from the detector coordinate space.
    Wallace ND; Ceguerra AV; Breen AJ; Ringer SP
    Ultramicroscopy; 2018 Jun; 189():65-75. PubMed ID: 29625338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the use of simulated field-evaporated specimen apex shapes in atom probe tomography data reconstruction.
    Larson DJ; Geiser BP; Prosa TJ; Kelly TF
    Microsc Microanal; 2012 Oct; 18(5):953-63. PubMed ID: 23058657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revealing the 3-dimensional shape of atom probe tips by atomic force microscopy.
    Fleischmann C; Paredis K; Melkonyan D; Vandervorst W
    Ultramicroscopy; 2018 Nov; 194():221-226. PubMed ID: 30216823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the Spatial Accuracy of the Reconstruction in Atom Probe Tomography and a New Calibratable Adaptive Reconstruction.
    Ceguerra AV; Day AC; Ringer SP
    Microsc Microanal; 2019 Apr; 25(2):309-319. PubMed ID: 31018880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probing the crystallography of ordered Phases by coupling of orientation microscopy with atom probe tomography.
    Meher S; Nandwana P; Rojhirunsakool T; Tiley J; Banerjee R
    Ultramicroscopy; 2015 Jan; 148():67-74. PubMed ID: 25314625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revealing latent pole and zone line information in atom probe detector maps using crystallographically correlated metrics.
    Breen AJ; Day AC; Lim B; Davids WJ; Ringer SP
    Ultramicroscopy; 2023 Jan; 243():113640. PubMed ID: 36356407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calibration of reconstruction parameters in atom probe tomography using a single crystallographic orientation.
    Suram SK; Rajan K
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Sep; 132():136-42. PubMed ID: 23507030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Level set methods for modelling field evaporation in atom probe.
    Haley D; Moody MP; Smith GD
    Microsc Microanal; 2013 Dec; 19(6):1709-17. PubMed ID: 23985174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analytical model accounting for tip shape evolution during atom probe analysis of heterogeneous materials.
    Rolland N; Larson DJ; Geiser BP; Duguay S; Vurpillot F; Blavette D
    Ultramicroscopy; 2015 Dec; 159 Pt 2():195-201. PubMed ID: 25818366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlating Atom Probe Crystallographic Measurements with Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction Data.
    Breen AJ; Babinsky K; Day AC; Eder K; Oakman CJ; Trimby PW; Primig S; Cairney JM; Ringer SP
    Microsc Microanal; 2017 Apr; 23(2):279-290. PubMed ID: 28288697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Restoring the lattice of Si-based atom probe reconstructions for enhanced information on dopant positioning.
    Breen AJ; Moody MP; Ceguerra AV; Gault B; Araullo-Peters VJ; Ringer SP
    Ultramicroscopy; 2015 Dec; 159 Pt 2():314-23. PubMed ID: 26190007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bottom-Up Volume Reconstruction Method for Atom Probe Tomography.
    Ling YT; Cools S; Bogdanowicz J; Fleischmann C; Beenhouwer J; Sijbers J; Vandervorst W
    Microsc Microanal; 2022 Jan; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 35088688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated Atom-By-Atom Three-Dimensional (3D) Reconstruction of Field Ion Microscopy Data.
    Dagan M; Gault B; Smith GDW; Bagot PAJ; Moody MP
    Microsc Microanal; 2017 Apr; 23(2):255-268. PubMed ID: 28318483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A computational geometry framework for the optimisation of atom probe reconstructions.
    Felfer P; Cairney J
    Ultramicroscopy; 2016 Oct; 169():62-68. PubMed ID: 27449275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Atom Probe Reconstruction With a Locally Varying Emitter Shape.
    Beinke D; Schmitz G
    Microsc Microanal; 2019 Apr; 25(2):280-287. PubMed ID: 30460892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpreting Atom Probe Data from Oxide-Metal Interfaces.
    McCarroll I; Scherrer B; Felfer P; Moody MP; Cairney JM
    Microsc Microanal; 2018 Aug; 24(4):342-349. PubMed ID: 30175704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A model to predict image formation in Atom probe Tomography.
    Vurpillot F; Gaillard A; Da Costa G; Deconihout B
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Sep; 132():152-7. PubMed ID: 23398963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New Atom Probe Tomography Reconstruction Algorithm for Multilayered Samples: Beyond the Hemispherical Constraint.
    Rolland N; Vurpillot F; Duguay S; Mazumder B; Speck JS; Blavette D
    Microsc Microanal; 2017 Apr; 23(2):247-254. PubMed ID: 28327210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.