These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30714401)

  • 1. Validation of an OpenSim full-body model with detailed lumbar spine for estimating lower lumbar spine loads during symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks.
    Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Robertson WSP; Brandon SCE; Fraser R; Freeman BJC; Graham RB; Thewlis D; Jones CF
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Apr; 22(5):451-464. PubMed ID: 30714401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of lumbar spinal loading and trunk muscle forces during asymmetric lifting tasks: application of whole-body musculoskeletal modelling in OpenSim.
    Kim HK; Zhang Y
    Ergonomics; 2017 Apr; 60(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 27194401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subject-specific regression equations to estimate lower spinal loads during symmetric and asymmetric static lifting.
    Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; El Ouaaid Z; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109550. PubMed ID: 31932024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An investigation of jogging biomechanics using the full-body lumbar spine model: Model development and validation.
    Raabe ME; Chaudhari AMW
    J Biomech; 2016 May; 49(7):1238-1243. PubMed ID: 26947033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.
    Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals.
    Schultz A; Andersson G; Ortengren R; Haderspeck K; Nachemson A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1982 Jun; 64(5):713-20. PubMed ID: 7085696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A braced arm-to-thigh (BATT) lifting technique reduces lumbar spine loads in healthy and low back pain participants.
    Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Brandon SCE; Robertson WSP; Fraser R; Freeman BJC; Graham RB; Thewlis D; Jones CF
    J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109584. PubMed ID: 31898975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of lumbar spine loading from a musculoskeletal model including the lower limbs and lumbar spine.
    Actis JA; Honegger JD; Gates DH; Petrella AJ; Nolasco LA; Silverman AK
    J Biomech; 2018 Feb; 68():107-114. PubMed ID: 29310946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anterior thoracic posture increases thoracolumbar disc loading.
    Harrison DE; Colloca CJ; Harrison DD; Janik TJ; Haas JW; Keller TS
    Eur Spine J; 2005 Apr; 14(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 15168237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    J Biomech; 1995 Nov; 28(11):1309-17. PubMed ID: 8522544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities.
    Dolan P; Earley M; Adams MA
    J Biomech; 1994 Oct; 27(10):1237-48. PubMed ID: 7962011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive equations for lumbar spine loads in load-dependent asymmetric one- and two-handed lifting activities.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jul; 27(6):537-44. PubMed ID: 22265249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of biomechanical parameters in the lumbar spine during static sagittal plane lifting.
    Kong WZ; Goel VK; Gilbertson LG
    J Biomech Eng; 1998 Apr; 120(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 10412390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of lumbar spine and muscle loading between male and female workers during box transfers.
    Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2018 Nov; 81():76-85. PubMed ID: 30286979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transverse-contour modeling of trunk muscle-distributed forces and spinal loads during lifting and twisting.
    Davis JR; Mirka GA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jan; 25(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 10685481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A biomechanical model for estimating loads on thoracic and lumbar vertebrae.
    Iyer S; Christiansen BA; Roberts BJ; Valentine MJ; Manoharan RK; Bouxsein ML
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Nov; 25(9):853-8. PubMed ID: 20655634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A combined passive and active musculoskeletal model study to estimate L4-L5 load sharing.
    Azari F; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Rahimi-Moghaddam T
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():157-165. PubMed ID: 28527584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative ability of EMG, optimization, and hybrid modelling approaches to predict trunk muscle forces and lumbar spine loading during dynamic sagittal plane lifting.
    Gagnon D; Larivière C; Loisel P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Jun; 16(5):359-72. PubMed ID: 11390042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of the AnyBody full body musculoskeletal model in computing lumbar spine loads at L4L5 level.
    Bassani T; Stucovitz E; Qian Z; Briguglio M; Galbusera F
    J Biomech; 2017 Jun; 58():89-96. PubMed ID: 28521951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.