These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30714500)
1. Controlled comparative clinical trial of hearing benefit outcomes for users of the Cochlear™ Nucleus Warren CD; Nel E; Boyd PJ Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):116-126. PubMed ID: 30714500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus(®) 6 system. Plasmans A; Rushbrooke E; Moran M; Spence C; Theuwis L; Zarowski A; Offeciers E; Atkinson B; McGovern J; Dornan D; Leigh J; Kaicer A; Hollow R; Martelli L; Looi V; Nel E; Del Dot J; Cowan R; Mauger SJ Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 83():193-9. PubMed ID: 26968076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving Hearing Performance for Cochlear Implant Recipients with Use of a Digital, Wireless, Remote-Microphone, Audio-Streaming Accessory. Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 26134720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study. Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conversion of adult Nucleus® 5 cochlear implant users to the Nucleus® 6 system. De Ceulaer G; Swinnen F; Pascoal D; Philips B; Killian M; James C; Govaerts PJ; Dhooge I Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jul; 16(4):222-32. PubMed ID: 25284643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits of upgrading to the Nucleus Todorov MJ; Galvin KL Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Jul; 19(4):210-215. PubMed ID: 29566583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor. Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefits of Bilateral Hearing on the Telephone for Cochlear Implant Recipients. Miller S; Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Agrawal S; Koch D; Neumann S J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 33873219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A real-world evaluation of the clinical benefits of improved sound processor technology among Chinese cochlear implant users: A focus on Cochlear Nucleus 7. Deng X; Wu C; Wu L; Lu J; Zhang J PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0307044. PubMed ID: 39226302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Improving speech comprehension using a new cochlear implant speech processor]. Müller-Deile J; Kortmann T; Hoppe U; Hessel H; Morsnowski A HNO; 2009 Jun; 57(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 18685820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recognition of Speech from the Television with Use of a Wireless Technology Designed for Cochlear Implants. Duke MM; Wolfe J; Schafer E J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 May; 27(5):388-394. PubMed ID: 27179258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome evaluation on cochlear implant users with residual hearing. Neben N; Buechner A; Schuessler M; Lenarz T Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 29214896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcomes with the Kanso™ off-the-ear cochlear implant sound processor. Mauger SJ; Jones M; Nel E; Del Dot J Int J Audiol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 28067077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits of Adaptive Signal Processing in a Commercially Available Cochlear Implant Sound Processor. Wolfe J; Neumann S; Marsh M; Schafer E; Lianos L; Gilden J; O'Neill L; Arkis P; Menapace C; Nel E; Jones M Otol Neurotol; 2015 Aug; 36(7):1181-90. PubMed ID: 26049314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech Recognition of Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients Using a Wireless Audio Streaming Accessory for the Telephone. Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e20-5. PubMed ID: 26756151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Validation of a Sound Processor Upgrade in Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Subjects. Kludt E; D'hondt C; Lenarz T; Maier H Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jun; 38(5):655-661. PubMed ID: 28406848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing. Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electromagnetic versus electrical coupling of personal frequency modulation (FM) receivers to cochlear implant sound processors. Schafer EC; Romine D; Musgrave E; Momin S; Huynh C J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):927-40. PubMed ID: 24384079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]