BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30715083)

  • 1. Self-compression Technique vs Standard Compression in Mammography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Henrot P; Boisserie-Lacroix M; Boute V; Troufléau P; Boyer B; Lesanne G; Gillon V; Desandes E; Netter E; Saadate M; Tardivon A; Grentzinger C; Salleron J; Oldrini G
    JAMA Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 179(3):407-414. PubMed ID: 30715083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-centred care with self-compression mammography in clinical practice: a randomized trial compared to standard compression.
    Iotti V; Giorgi Rossi P; Canovi L; Guberti M; Nitrosi A; Lippolis DG; Marchesi V; Besutti G; Ottone M; Vacondio R; Pattacini P;
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):450-460. PubMed ID: 35869315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography.
    Balleyguier C; Cousin M; Dunant A; Attard M; Delaloge S; Arfi-Rouche J
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 103():137-142. PubMed ID: 30223227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of technical parameters and women's experience between self-compression and standard compression modes in mammography screening: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Arenas N; Alcantara R; Posso M; Louro J; Perez-Leon D; Ejarque B; Arranz M; Maiques J; Castells X; Macià F; Román M; Rodríguez-Arana A
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7480-7487. PubMed ID: 35536390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.
    de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081901. PubMed ID: 23927315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the patient-assisted compression mode affect the mammography quality? A within-woman randomized controlled trial.
    Perez-Leon D; Posso M; Louro J; Ejarque B; Arranz M; Arenas N; Maiques J; Martínez J; Maciá F; Román M; Rodríguez-Arana A; Castells X; Alcántara R
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7470-7479. PubMed ID: 35536391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Single-Fraction vs Multifraction Radiotherapy on Ambulatory Status Among Patients With Spinal Canal Compression From Metastatic Cancer: The SCORAD Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Hoskin PJ; Hopkins K; Misra V; Holt T; McMenemin R; Dubois D; McKinna F; Foran B; Madhavan K; MacGregor C; Bates A; O'Rourke N; Lester JF; Sevitt T; Roos D; Dixit S; Brown G; Arnott S; Thomas SS; Forsyth S; Beare S; Reczko K; Hackshaw A; Lopes A
    JAMA; 2019 Dec; 322(21):2084-2094. PubMed ID: 31794625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast compression in mammography: how much is enough?
    Poulos A; McLean D; Rickard M; Heard R
    Australas Radiol; 2003 Jun; 47(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 12780439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can Breast Compression Be Reduced in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis?
    Agasthya GA; D'Orsi E; Kim YJ; Handa P; Ho CP; D'Orsi CJ; Sechopoulos I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):W322-W332. PubMed ID: 28929809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated Opt-Out vs Opt-In Patient Outreach Strategies for Breast Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Marcotte LM; Deeds S; Wheat C; Gunnink E; Gray K; Rojas J; Finch C; Nelson K; Reddy A
    JAMA Intern Med; 2023 Nov; 183(11):1187-1194. PubMed ID: 37695621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction of discomfort during mammography utilizing a radiolucent cushioning pad.
    Markle L; Roux S; Sayre JW
    Breast J; 2004; 10(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 15239794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
    Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compression forces used in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Waade GG; Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Hogg P; Hofvind S
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160770. PubMed ID: 28102696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of pressure-controlled mammography compression paddles with respect to force-controlled compression paddles in clinical practice.
    Jeukens CRLPN; van Dijk T; Berben C; Wildberger JE; Lobbes MBI
    Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2545-2552. PubMed ID: 30617472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of a Hypnosis Session Before General Anesthesia on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Minor Breast Cancer Surgery: The HYPNOSEIN Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Amraoui J; Pouliquen C; Fraisse J; Dubourdieu J; Rey Dit Guzer S; Leclerc G; de Forges H; Jarlier M; Gutowski M; Bleuse JP; Janiszewski C; Diaz J; Cuvillon P
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Aug; 1(4):e181164. PubMed ID: 30646110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Longer-Interval vs Standard Dosing of Zoledronic Acid on Skeletal Events in Patients With Bone Metastases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Himelstein AL; Foster JC; Khatcheressian JL; Roberts JD; Seisler DK; Novotny PJ; Qin R; Go RS; Grubbs SS; O'Connor T; Velasco MR; Weckstein D; O'Mara A; Loprinzi CL; Shapiro CL
    JAMA; 2017 Jan; 317(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 28030702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the use of self-compression in mammography affect compression force, breast thickness, and mean glandular dose?
    Alukic E; Bravhar P; Mekis N
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jun; 139():109694. PubMed ID: 33839429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compression force and radiation dose in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Waade GG; Sanderud A; Hofvind S
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 88():41-46. PubMed ID: 28189207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast compression and reported pain during mammographic screening.
    Moshina N; Sagstad S; Sebuødegård S; Waade GG; Gran E; Music J; Hofvind S
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):133-139. PubMed ID: 32052779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.