These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30715146)

  • 1. Evaluation of ontology structural metrics based on public repository data.
    Franco M; Vivo JM; Quesada-Martínez M; Duque-Ramos A; Fernández-Breis JT
    Brief Bioinform; 2020 Mar; 21(2):473-485. PubMed ID: 30715146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary Analysis of the OBO Foundry Ontologies and Their Evolution Using OQuaRE.
    Quesada-Martínez M; Duque-Ramos A; Iniesta-Moreno M; Fernández-Breis JT
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 235():426-430. PubMed ID: 28423828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supporting the analysis of ontology evolution processes through the combination of static and dynamic scaling functions in OQuaRE.
    Duque-Ramos A; Quesada-Martínez M; Iniesta-Moreno M; Fernández-Breis JT; Stevens R
    J Biomed Semantics; 2016 Oct; 7(1):63. PubMed ID: 27751176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of readability and structural accuracy in SNOMED CT.
    Abad-Navarro F; Quesada-Martínez M; Duque-Ramos A; Fernández-Breis JT
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Dec; 20(Suppl 10):284. PubMed ID: 33319711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient safety classifications, taxonomies and ontologies: A systematic review on development and evaluation methodologies.
    Taheri Moghadam S; Hooman N; Sheikhtaheri A
    J Biomed Inform; 2022 Sep; 133():104150. PubMed ID: 35878822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing Resolvability and Consistency in OBO Foundry Ontologies: Pilot Study.
    Zhang S; Benis N; Cornet R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 Nov; 287():104-108. PubMed ID: 34795091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An automated process for supporting decisions in clustering-based data analysis.
    Bernabé-Díaz JA; Franco M; Vivo JM; Quesada-Martínez M; Fernández-Breis JT
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 219():106765. PubMed ID: 35367914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semi-automated ontology generation within OBO-Edit.
    Wächter T; Schroeder M
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i88-96. PubMed ID: 20529942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modulated evaluation metrics for drug-based ontologies.
    Amith M; Tao C
    J Biomed Semantics; 2017 Apr; 8(1):17. PubMed ID: 28438189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ontology for vector surveillance and management.
    Lozano-Fuentes S; Bandyopadhyay A; Cowell LG; Goldfain A; Eisen L
    J Med Entomol; 2013 Jan; 50(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 23427646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. OBO Foundry in 2021: operationalizing open data principles to evaluate ontologies.
    Jackson R; Matentzoglu N; Overton JA; Vita R; Balhoff JP; Buttigieg PL; Carbon S; Courtot M; Diehl AD; Dooley DM; Duncan WD; Harris NL; Haendel MA; Lewis SE; Natale DA; Osumi-Sutherland D; Ruttenberg A; Schriml LM; Smith B; Stoeckert CJ; Vasilevsky NA; Walls RL; Zheng J; Mungall CJ; Peters B
    Database (Oxford); 2021 Oct; 2021():. PubMed ID: 34697637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. OBIB-a novel ontology for biobanking.
    Brochhausen M; Zheng J; Birtwell D; Williams H; Masci AM; Ellis HJ; Stoeckert CJ
    J Biomed Semantics; 2016; 7():23. PubMed ID: 27148435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Formative evaluation of ontology learning methods for entity discovery by using existing ontologies as reference standards.
    Liu K; Mitchell KJ; Chapman WW; Savova GK; Sioutos N; Rubin DL; Crowley RS
    Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 23666409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient safety classifications, taxonomies and ontologies, part 2: A systematic review on content coverage.
    Taheri Moghadam S; Sheikhtaheri A; Hooman N
    J Biomed Inform; 2023 Dec; 148():104549. PubMed ID: 37984548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the Good Ontology Design Guideline (GoodOD) with the ontology quality requirements and evaluation method and metrics (OQuaRE).
    Duque-Ramos A; Boeker M; Jansen L; Schulz S; Iniesta M; Fernández-Breis JT
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104463. PubMed ID: 25148262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How orthogonal are the OBO Foundry ontologies?
    Ghazvinian A; Noy NF; Musen MA
    J Biomed Semantics; 2011 May; 2 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2. PubMed ID: 21624157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FYPO: the fission yeast phenotype ontology.
    Harris MA; Lock A; Bähler J; Oliver SG; Wood V
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Jul; 29(13):1671-8. PubMed ID: 23658422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A UML profile for the OBO relation ontology.
    Guardia GD; Vêncio RZ; de Farias CR
    BMC Genomics; 2012; 13 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S3. PubMed ID: 23095840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extending the DIDEO ontology to include entities from the natural product drug interaction domain of discourse.
    Judkins J; Tay-Sontheimer J; Boyce RD; Brochhausen M
    J Biomed Semantics; 2018 May; 9(1):15. PubMed ID: 29743102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survey-based naming conventions for use in OBO Foundry ontology development.
    Schober D; Smith B; Lewis SE; Kusnierczyk W; Lomax J; Mungall C; Taylor CF; Rocca-Serra P; Sansone SA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Apr; 10():125. PubMed ID: 19397794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.