BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30716285)

  • 1. Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean accurate?
    Harris BS; Heine RP; Park J; Faurot KR; Hopkins MK; Rivara AJ; Kemeny HR; Grotegut CA; Jelovsek JE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):492.e1-492.e7. PubMed ID: 30716285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveries using machine learning.
    Lipschuetz M; Guedalia J; Rottenstreich A; Novoselsky Persky M; Cohen SM; Kabiri D; Levin G; Yagel S; Unger R; Sompolinsky Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 222(6):613.e1-613.e12. PubMed ID: 32007491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model.
    Fagerberg MC; Maršál K; Källén K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():88-94. PubMed ID: 25801723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries.
    Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Faucett AM; Grobman WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 125(4):948-952. PubMed ID: 25751218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting obstetrical anal sphincter injuries in patients who undergo vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Luchristt D; Brown O; Pidaparti M; Kenton K; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Miller ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):173.e1-173.e8. PubMed ID: 33617798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. French validation and adaptation of the Grobman nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Haumonte JB; Raylet M; Christophe M; Mauviel F; Bertrand A; Desbriere R; d'Ercole C
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 47(3):127-131. PubMed ID: 29229362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the predictive accuracy of the new vaginal birth after cesarean delivery calculator.
    Adjei NN; McMillan C; Hosier H; Partridge C; Adeyemo OO; Illuzzi J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100960. PubMed ID: 37028551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: a calculator without race and ethnicity.
    Grobman WA; Sandoval G; Rice MM; Bailit JL; Chauhan SP; Costantine MM; Gyamfi-Bannerman C; Metz TD; Parry S; Rouse DJ; Saade GR; Simhan HN; Thorp JM; Tita ATN; Longo M; Landon MB;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 225(6):664.e1-664.e7. PubMed ID: 34043983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a predictive model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section.
    Fonseca JE; Rodriguez JL; Maya Salazar D
    Colomb Med (Cali); 2019 Mar; 50(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 31168165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of ante-partum ultrasound in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: A prospective cohort study.
    Rizzo G; Bitsadze V; Khizroeva J; Mappa I; Makatsariya A; Liberati M; D'Antonio F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jan; 256():385-390. PubMed ID: 33279807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting vaginal birth after caesarean section: Validation of the Grobman model in a New Zealand population.
    Windsor RS; Clark HE; Blasingame JLJ
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Oct; 62(5):658-663. PubMed ID: 35342928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean in the preterm period.
    Mardy AH; Ananth CV; Grobman WA; Gyamfi-Bannerman C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):513.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27262971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity.
    Hibbard JU; Ismail MA; Wang Y; Te C; Karrison T; Ismail MA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1365-71; discussion 1371-3. PubMed ID: 11408854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of prediction model for successful vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery based on sonographic assessment of hysterotomy scar.
    Baranov A; Salvesen KÅ; Vikhareva O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 28233347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vaginal birth after cesarean: Does accuracy of predicted success change from prenatal intake to admission?
    Ha TK; Rao RR; Maykin MM; Mei JY; Havard AL; Gaw SL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2020 May; 2(2):100094. PubMed ID: 33345960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of the close-to-delivery prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a Middle Eastern cohort.
    Abdel Aziz A; Abd Rabbo A; Sayed Ahmed WA; Khamees RE; Atwa KA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jul; 134(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 27118509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Costantine MM; Fox K; Byers BD; Mateus J; Ghulmiyyah LM; Blackwell S; Hankins GDV; Grobman WA; Saade G
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1029-1033. PubMed ID: 20168103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does midtrimester cervical length aid in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean?
    Miller ES; Sakowicz A; Donelan EA; Grobman WA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):791.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25726519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean - the benefit of prior vaginal delivery.
    Ashwal E; Wertheimer A; Aviram A; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y; Hiersch L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(16):2665-70. PubMed ID: 26399162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Establishment and validation of a prediction model for vaginal delivery after cesarean and its pregnancy outcomes-Based on a prospective study.
    Lin J; Hou Y; Ke Y; Zeng W; Gu W
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Nov; 242():114-121. PubMed ID: 31580963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.