370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30716285)
21. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Bhide A; Caric V; Arulkumaran S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 26952353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean.
Chaillet N; Bujold E; Dubé E; Grobman WA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Feb; 35(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 23470060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. External validation of prediction models for vaginal delivery after the trial of labour among women with previous one caesarean section - A cohort study.
Pegu B; Subburaj SP; Chaturvedula L; Sarkar S; Nair NS; Keepanasseril A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Dec; 291():10-15. PubMed ID: 37801782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery at the university hospital in Barcelona.
Baranov A; Gratacós E; Vikhareva O; Figueras F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Dec; 30(24):2998-3003. PubMed ID: 27936993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. External validation of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery calculator in Israeli cohort of parturients and construction of an improved model.
Haggiag N; Eitan S; Maor-Sagie E; Hallak M; Gabbay-Benziv R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 161(1):182-189. PubMed ID: 36066199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kabiri D; Masarwy R; Schachter-Safrai N; Masarwa R; Hirsh Raccah B; Ezra Y; Matok I
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):336-347. PubMed ID: 30465748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mid-trimester cervical length and prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese parturients: A retrospective study.
Liu G; Zhou C; Wang S; Zhang H
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 52(9):102647. PubMed ID: 37611746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A prediction tool for mode of delivery in twin pregnancies-a secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study.
Aviram A; Barrett J; Mei-Dan E; Yoon EW; Melamed N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jul; 231(1):124.e1-124.e11. PubMed ID: 37979823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Establishment of an antepartum predictive scoring model to identify candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean.
Liao Q; Luo J; Zheng L; Han Q; Liu Z; Qi W; Yang T; Yan J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):639. PubMed ID: 33081753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Obstetrician call schedule and obstetric outcomes among women eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean.
Yee LM; Liu LY; Grobman WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):75.e1-75.e6. PubMed ID: 27589899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Success of trial of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean section for failed labor induction or labor dystocia: a retrospective cohort study.
Place K; Kruit H; Tekay A; Heinonen S; Rahkonen L
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 May; 19(1):176. PubMed ID: 31109302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Verification a model of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese pregnant women.
Xu P; Feng Y; Shen H; Luo J; Tao Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Dec; 98(52):e18421. PubMed ID: 31876717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Third-trimester prediction of successful vaginal birth after one cesarean delivery-A Swedish model.
Carlsson Fagerberg M; Källén K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 May; 99(5):660-668. PubMed ID: 31788783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
Sentilhes L; Vayssière C; Beucher G; Deneux-Tharaux C; Deruelle P; Diemunsch P; Gallot D; Haumonté JB; Heimann S; Kayem G; Lopez E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Sellier Y; Rozenberg P; d'Ercole C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23810846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of factors that predict the success rate of trial of labor after the cesarean section.
Mi Y; Qu P; Guo N; Bai R; Gao J; Ma Z; He Y; Wang C; Luo X
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jul; 21(1):527. PubMed ID: 34303355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate.
Schoorel EN; Melman S; van Kuijk SM; Grobman WA; Kwee A; Mol BW; Nijhuis JG; Smits LJ; Aardenburg R; de Boer K; Delemarre FM; van Dooren IM; Franssen MT; Kleiverda G; Kaplan M; Kuppens SM; Lim FT; Sikkema JM; Smid-Koopman E; Visser H; Vrouenraets FP; Woiski M; Hermens RP; Scheepers HC
BJOG; 2014 Jun; 121(7):840-7; discussion 847. PubMed ID: 24533534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predicting Successful Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Evaluation of Two Scoring Systems.
Patel MD; Maitra N; Patel PK; Sheth T; Vaishnav P
J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2018 Aug; 68(4):276-282. PubMed ID: 30065542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Southeast China: a retrospective cohort study.
Zhang HL; Zheng LH; Cheng LC; Liu ZD; Yu L; Han Q; Miao GY; Yan JY
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Sep; 20(1):538. PubMed ID: 32933509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Japanese women.
Yokoi A; Ishikawa K; Miyazaki K; Yoshida K; Furuhashi M; Tamakoshi K
Int J Med Sci; 2012; 9(6):488-91. PubMed ID: 22927774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Number of prior vaginal deliveries and trial of labor after cesarean success.
Atia O; Rotem R; Reichman O; Jaffe A; Grisaru-Granovsky S; Sela HY; Rottenstreich M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jan; 256():189-193. PubMed ID: 33246204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
