These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30717658)

  • 1. Automated craniofacial landmarks detection on 3D image using geometry characteristics information.
    Abu A; Ngo CG; Abu-Hassan NIA; Othman SA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Feb; 19(Suppl 13):548. PubMed ID: 30717658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photo anthropometric variations in Japanese facial features: Establishment of large-sample standard reference data for personal identification using a three-dimensional capture system.
    Ogawa Y; Wada B; Taniguchi K; Miyasaka S; Imaizumi K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():511.e1-511.e9. PubMed ID: 26341158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on 3D laser-scanned facial images.
    Toma AM; Zhurov A; Playle R; Ong E; Richmond S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Feb; 12(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 19154273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of an automated method of 3D soft tissue landmark detection.
    Baksi S; Freezer S; Matsumoto T; Dreyer C
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Dec; 43(6):622-630. PubMed ID: 33377968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lip Anthropometry of Healthy Turkish Young Adults.
    Bahşi I; Orhan M; Kervancioğlu P; Uçar H; Karatepe Ş; Sayin S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Mar-Apr 01; 33(2):696-700. PubMed ID: 34310423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-Fidelity Anthropometric Facial Measurements Can Be Obtained From a Single Stereophotograph From the Vectra H1 3-Dimensional Camera.
    Jodeh DS; Rottgers SA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Oct; 56(9):1164-1170. PubMed ID: 30955356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved detection of landmarks on 3D human face data.
    Liang S; Wu J; Weinberg SM; Shapiro LG
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():6482-5. PubMed ID: 24111226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of a face scanner in measuring the vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Srinivasan M; Berisha F; Bronzino I; Kamnoedboon P; Leles CR
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105016. PubMed ID: 38679136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
    Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel approach to craniofacial analysis using automated 3D landmarking of the skull.
    Wilke F; Matthews H; Herrick N; Dopkins N; Claes P; Walsh S
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12381. PubMed ID: 38811771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).
    Al-Anezi T; Khambay B; Peng MJ; O'Leary E; Ju X; Ayoub A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 23218511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing Methods to Assess Intraobserver Measurement Error of 3D Craniofacial Landmarks Using Geometric Morphometrics Through a Digitizer Arm.
    Menéndez LP
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):741-746. PubMed ID: 27874192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses.
    Percival CJ; Devine J; Darwin BC; Liu W; van Eede M; Henkelman RM; Hallgrimsson B
    J Anat; 2019 Jun; 234(6):917-935. PubMed ID: 30901082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated 3D Perioral Landmark Detection Using High-Resolution Network: Artificial Intelligence-based Anthropometric Analysis.
    Yang Y; Zhang M; An Y; Huang Q; Shi Y; Jin L; Zeng A; Long X; Yu N; Wang X
    Aesthet Surg J; 2024 Jul; 44(8):NP606-NP612. PubMed ID: 38662744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and precision of a 3D anthropometric facial analysis with and without landmark labeling before image acquisition.
    Aynechi N; Larson BE; Leon-Salazar V; Beiraghi S
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Mar; 81(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 21208076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and reproducibility of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for the maxillofacial anthropometric measurement on cleft patients.
    Othman SA; Saffai L; Wan Hassan WN
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Aug; 24(8):2853-2866. PubMed ID: 31754872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can smartphones be used for routine dental clinical application? A validation study for using smartphone-generated 3D facial images.
    Singh P; Hsung RT; Ajmera DH; Leung YY; McGrath C; Gu M
    J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104775. PubMed ID: 37944629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Open-Source Tools for Dense Facial Tissue Depth Mapping of Computed Tomography Models.
    Simmons-Ehrhardt T; Falsetti C; Falsetti AB; Ehrhardt CJ
    Hum Biol; 2018 Jan; 90(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 30387384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.