These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30719680)

  • 21. Differential effects of visual context on pattern discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Kelly DM; Cook RG
    J Comp Psychol; 2003 Jun; 117(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 12856790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selective attention and pigeons' multiple necessary cues discrimination learning.
    Teng Y; Vyazovska OV; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2015 Mar; 112():61-71. PubMed ID: 25150067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of occlusion on pigeons' visual object recognition.
    DiPietro NT; Wasserman EA; Young ME
    Perception; 2002; 31(11):1299-312. PubMed ID: 12489767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dorsal hippocampus is necessary for visual categorization in rats.
    Kim J; Castro L; Wasserman EA; Freeman JH
    Hippocampus; 2018 Jun; 28(6):392-405. PubMed ID: 29473984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pigeons' recognition of partially occluded objects depends on specific training experience.
    Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA; Biederman I
    Perception; 2007; 36(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 17357704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transfer to intermediate forms following concept discrimination by pigeons: chimeras and morphs.
    Ghosh N; Lea SE; Noury M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2):125-41. PubMed ID: 15540501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Categorization of multidimensional stimuli by pigeons.
    Berg ME; Grace RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 May; 95(3):305-26. PubMed ID: 21547069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pigeons use item-specific and category-level information in the identification and categorization of human faces.
    Loidolt M; Aust U; Meran I; Huber L
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Oct; 29(4):261-76. PubMed ID: 14570515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital embryos: a novel technical approach to investigate perceptual categorization in pigeons (Columba livia) using machine learning.
    Pusch R; Packheiser J; Koenen C; Iovine F; Güntürkün O
    Anim Cogn; 2022 Aug; 25(4):793-805. PubMed ID: 34989909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Selective and distributed attention in human and pigeon category learning.
    Castro L; Savic O; Navarro V; Sloutsky VM; Wasserman EA
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104350. PubMed ID: 32634739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The neuroscience of perceptual categorization in pigeons: A mechanistic hypothesis.
    Güntürkün O; Koenen C; Iovine F; Garland A; Pusch R
    Learn Behav; 2018 Sep; 46(3):229-241. PubMed ID: 29532328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pigeon category learning: Revisiting the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.
    Navarro VM; Jani R; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):174-184. PubMed ID: 30869935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The spatial distribution of pigeons' target detection.
    Wilkie DM; Saksida LM
    Behav Brain Res; 1994 Feb; 60(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 8003243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pigeons acquire multiple categories in parallel via associative learning: a parallel to human word learning?
    Wasserman EA; Brooks DI; McMurray B
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():99-122. PubMed ID: 25497520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pigeons exhibit flexibility but not rule formation in dimensional learning, stimulus generalization, and task switching.
    O'Donoghue EM; Broschard MB; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):107-123. PubMed ID: 31916780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pigeons show efficient visual search by category: effects of typicality and practice.
    Ohkita M; Jitsumori M
    Vision Res; 2012 Nov; 72():63-73. PubMed ID: 23022550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Wills AJ; Lea SE; Leaver LA; Osthaus B; Ryan CM; Suret MB; Bryant CM; Chapman SJ; Millar L
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 19929108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Taking pigeons to heart: Birds proficiently diagnose human cardiac disease.
    Navarro VM; Wasserman EA; Slomka P
    Learn Behav; 2020 Mar; 48(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 31965462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Applying bubbles to localize features that control pigeons' visual discrimination behavior.
    Gibson BM; Wasserman EA; Gosselin F; Schyns PG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jul; 31(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 16045392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A prototype effect and categorization of artificial polymorphous stimuli in pigeons.
    Jitsumori M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1996 Oct; 22(4):405-19. PubMed ID: 8865609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.