BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30721261)

  • 1. Anatomical location-based nodal staging system is superior to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system among patients with surgically resected, histologically low-grade gastric cancer: A single institutional experience.
    Chen MW; Chan CP; Lin YJ; Yen HH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211836. PubMed ID: 30721261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Topographic lymph node staging system shows prognostic superiority compared to the 8th edition of AJCC TNM in gastric cancer. A western monocentric experience.
    Lauricella S; Caricato M; Mascianà G; Carannante F; Carnazza M; Bonaccorso A; Angeletti S; Ciccozzi M; Coppola R; Capolupo GT
    Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():223-233. PubMed ID: 32869748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.
    Marano L; Boccardi V; Braccio B; Esposito G; Grassia M; Petrillo M; Pezzella M; Porfidia R; Reda G; Romano A; Schettino M; Cosenza A; Izzo G; Di Martino N
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():215. PubMed ID: 26179492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the sixth, seventh, and eighth editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging system for gastric cancer: A single institution experience.
    Chen MW; Yen HH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Oct; 100(39):e27358. PubMed ID: 34596145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External validation of a modified 8th AJCC TNM system for advanced gastric cancer: Long-term results in southern China.
    Ye J; Ren Y; Wei Z; Hou X; Dai W; Cai S; Tan M; He Y; Yuan Y
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 27(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 29937164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proposal and validation of a modified staging system to improve the prognosis predictive performance of the 8th AJCC/UICC pTNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study with external validation.
    Fang C; Wang W; Deng JY; Sun Z; Seeruttun SR; Wang ZN; Xu HM; Liang H; Zhou ZW
    Cancer Commun (Lond); 2018 Nov; 38(1):67. PubMed ID: 30454049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition stage system for gastric cancer patients: a population-based analysis.
    He X; Wu W; Lin Z; Ding Y; Si J; Sun LM
    Gastric Cancer; 2018 May; 21(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 29052053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The Comparison between 6th and 7th International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification for Survival Prognosis of Gastric Cancer].
    Kim SS; Choi BY; Seo SI; Jung MY; Choi HS; Ahn SM; Choi WH; Kim HS; Kim KH; Jang MK; Lee JH; Kim HY; Shin WG
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2011 Nov; 58(5):258-63. PubMed ID: 22113042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the value of 7th editions of UICC-AJCC esophageal and gastric cancer TNM staging systems for prognostic prediction of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (Siewert type II)].
    Shi GD; Luo ZL; Fu MY; Tian D; Zhang L; Zhang KP
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 36(12):916-21. PubMed ID: 25623766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel lymph node staging system for gastric cancer including modified Union for cancer Control/American Joint Committee on cancer and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association criteria.
    Gong Y; Pan S; Wang X; Zhu G; Xu H; Zhu Z
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt B):e27-e32. PubMed ID: 32631708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the current AJCC-TNM numeric-based with a new anatomical location-based lymph node staging system for gastric cancer: A western experience.
    Galizia G; Lieto E; Auricchio A; Cardella F; Mabilia A; Diana A; Castellano P; De Vita F; Orditura M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0173619. PubMed ID: 28380037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system in patients with resected esophageal carcinoma.
    Hsu PK; Wu YC; Chou TY; Huang CS; Hsu WH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Apr; 89(4):1024-31. PubMed ID: 20338302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proposed Modification of Nodal Staging as an Alternative to the Seventh Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System Improves the Prognostic Prediction in the Resected Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma.
    Ning ZH; Wang ZG; Chen J; Li XD; Chen LJ; Xu B; Gu WD; Shao YJ; Xu Y; Huang J; Pei HL; Jiang JT
    J Thorac Oncol; 2015 Jul; 10(7):1091-8. PubMed ID: 26134226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survivals of patients with surgically treated and High-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: A comparative study between two American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th tumor-node-metastasis staging systems.
    Yang M; Zhang Y; Zeng L; Ke NW; Tan CL; Tian BL; Xiang B; Liu XB
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 30661921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 6th and 7th AJCC TNM staging classification for carcinoma of the stomach in China.
    Qiu MZ; Wang ZQ; Zhang DS; Liu Q; Luo HY; Zhou ZW; Li YH; Jiang WQ; Xu RH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Jul; 18(7):1869-76. PubMed ID: 21246404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic Performance of Different Lymph Node Staging Systems After Curative Intent Resection for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.
    Spolverato G; Ejaz A; Kim Y; Squires MH; Poultsides G; Fields RC; Bloomston M; Weber SM; Votanopoulos K; Acher AW; Jin LX; Hawkins WG; Schmidt C; Kooby DA; Worhunsky D; Saunders N; Cho CS; Levine EA; Maithel SK; Pawlik TM
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):991-8. PubMed ID: 25563867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A homogenized approach to classify advanced gastric cancer patients with limited and adequate number of pathologically examined lymph nodes.
    Seeruttun SR; Xu L; Wang F; Yi X; Fang C; Liu Z; Wang W; Zhou Z
    Cancer Commun (Lond); 2019 Jun; 39(1):32. PubMed ID: 31182160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Which staging system better predicts 10-year survival for gastric cancer? A study using an international multicenter database.
    Lin JX; Lin JP; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lu J; Chen QY; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang ZN; Lin JL; Zheng CH; Huang CM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 29804693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the new seventh AJCC/UICC staging system appropriate for patients with gastric cancer?
    Yoon HM; Ryu KW; Nam BH; Cho SJ; Park SR; Lee JY; Lee JH; Kook MC; Choi IJ; Kim YW
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Jan; 214(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 22036661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the 7th and the 8th AJCC Staging System for Non-metastatic D2-Resected Lymph Node-Positive Gastric Cancer Treated with Different Adjuvant Protocols.
    Yu JI; Lim DH; Lee J; Kang WK; Park SH; Park JO; Park YS; Lim HY; Kim ST; Lee SJ; Kim S; Sohn TS; Lee JH; An JY; Choi MG; Bae JM; Yoo H; Kim K
    Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jul; 51(3):876-885. PubMed ID: 30282450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.