These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30721750)

  • 1. Sliding window correlation analysis: Modulating window shape for dynamic brain connectivity in resting state.
    Mokhtari F; Akhlaghi MI; Simpson SL; Wu G; Laurienti PJ
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():655-666. PubMed ID: 30721750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of sliding window correlation performance for characterizing dynamic functional connectivity and brain states.
    Shakil S; Lee CH; Keilholz SD
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jun; 133():111-128. PubMed ID: 26952197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of motion related outliers in dynamic functional connectivity using the sliding window method.
    Savva AD; Kassinopoulos M; Smyrnis N; Matsopoulos GK; Mitsis GD
    J Neurosci Methods; 2020 Jan; 330():108519. PubMed ID: 31730872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-Time Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Averaged Sliding Windows with Partial Correlations and Regression of Confounding Signals.
    Vakamudi K; Trapp C; Talaat K; Gao K; Sa De La Rocque Guimaraes B; Posse S
    Brain Connect; 2020 Oct; 10(8):448-463. PubMed ID: 32892629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An average sliding window correlation method for dynamic functional connectivity.
    Vergara VM; Abrol A; Calhoun VD
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 May; 40(7):2089-2103. PubMed ID: 30659699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved dynamic connection detection power in estimated dynamic functional connectivity considering multivariate dependencies between brain regions.
    Maleki Balajoo S; Asemani D; Khadem A; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Oct; 41(15):4264-4287. PubMed ID: 32643845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic effective connectivity in resting state fMRI.
    Park HJ; Friston KJ; Pae C; Park B; Razi A
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt B):594-608. PubMed ID: 29158202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the relationship between instantaneous phase synchrony and correlation-based sliding windows for time-resolved fMRI connectivity analysis.
    Pedersen M; Omidvarnia A; Zalesky A; Jackson GD
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():85-94. PubMed ID: 29890326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Connectivity dynamics from wakefulness to sleep.
    Damaraju E; Tagliazucchi E; Laufs H; Calhoun VD
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 220():117047. PubMed ID: 32562782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity in resting state fMRI.
    Zhang C; Baum SA; Adduru VR; Biswal BB; Michael AM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():907-918. PubMed ID: 30120987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of global signal regression on characterizing dynamic functional connectivity and brain states.
    Xu H; Su J; Qin J; Li M; Zeng LL; Hu D; Shen H
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():127-145. PubMed ID: 29476914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic coherence analysis of resting fMRI data to jointly capture state-based phase, frequency, and time-domain information.
    Yaesoubi M; Allen EA; Miller RL; Calhoun VD
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():133-42. PubMed ID: 26162552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Construct validation of a DCM for resting state fMRI.
    Razi A; Kahan J; Rees G; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():1-14. PubMed ID: 25463471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complementary contributions of concurrent EEG and fMRI connectivity for predicting structural connectivity.
    Wirsich J; Ridley B; Besson P; Jirsa V; Bénar C; Ranjeva JP; Guye M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 161():251-260. PubMed ID: 28842386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sparse temporally dynamic resting-state functional connectivity networks for early MCI identification.
    Wee CY; Yang S; Yap PT; Shen D;
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2016 Jun; 10(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 26123390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical inference of dynamic resting-state functional connectivity using hierarchical observation modeling.
    Sojoudi A; Goodyear BG
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Dec; 37(12):4566-4580. PubMed ID: 27464464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DynamicBC: a MATLAB toolbox for dynamic brain connectome analysis.
    Liao W; Wu GR; Xu Q; Ji GJ; Zhang Z; Zang YF; Lu G
    Brain Connect; 2014 Dec; 4(10):780-90. PubMed ID: 25083734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Unified Estimation Framework for State-Related Changes in Effective Brain Connectivity.
    Samdin SB; Ting CM; Ombao H; Salleh SH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Apr; 64(4):844-858. PubMed ID: 27323355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of different dynamic functional connectivity methods to capture cognitively relevant information.
    Xie H; Zheng CY; Handwerker DA; Bandettini PA; Calhoun VD; Mitra S; Gonzalez-Castillo J
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():502-514. PubMed ID: 30576850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new model for dynamic mapping of effective connectivity in task fMRI.
    Chang X; Yang ZH; Yan W; Liu ZT; Luo C; Yao DZ
    Brain Res Bull; 2024 Jun; 212():110938. PubMed ID: 38641153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.