These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30722768)
1. Establishing a Review Process to Evaluate Research Guides. Brown H; Drummond D; Minter CIJ Med Ref Serv Q; 2018; 37(4):367-374. PubMed ID: 30722768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Creating Interactive Online Instruction: The McGoogan Library Experience. Hartman TL; Fial AV Med Ref Serv Q; 2015; 34(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 26496395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hoping for a TREND toward PRISMA: the variety and value of research reporting guidelines. Kearney MH Res Nurs Health; 2014 Apr; 37(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 24619627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bruce R; Chauvin A; Trinquart L; Ravaud P; Boutron I BMC Med; 2016 Jun; 14(1):85. PubMed ID: 27287500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expanding access to published research: open access and self-archiving. Mower A; Youngkin ME J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18347463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review. Haffar S; Bazerbachi F; Murad MH Mayo Clin Proc; 2019 Apr; 94(4):670-676. PubMed ID: 30797567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Pharmacology: A Comprehensive Drug Reference. Freundlich S; Hupe M Med Ref Serv Q; 2018; 37(4):386-396. PubMed ID: 30722769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rethinking Responsible Literature Searching using LibGuides. Gerberi D; Hawthorne DM; Larsen KE Med Ref Serv Q; 2012; 31(4):355-71. PubMed ID: 23092414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Analysis of Physician Assistant LibGuides: A Tool for Collection Development. Johnson CV; Johnson SY Med Ref Serv Q; 2017; 36(4):323-333. PubMed ID: 29043935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the Quality of Clinical Neuropsychological Research: Mandatory Use of Reporting Guidelines. Lee GP; Schoenberg MR Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Sep; 32(6):631-651. PubMed ID: 28910964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The move toward setting scientific standards for the content of medical review articles. Huth E J R Soc Med; 2009 Jun; 102(6):247-51. PubMed ID: 19531620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology. Galipeau J; Moher D; Campbell C; Hendry P; Cameron DW; Palepu A; Hébert PC J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 25510373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review. Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-assisted instruction in a health sciences library: an experimental project. Merrick NP; Braude RM Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1981 Jan; 69(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 7008876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using Subject Guides to Support Curriculum and Patient Care: A Multipronged Approach. Britton RM; Li J Med Ref Serv Q; 2019; 38(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30942684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How to review a paper for Heart. Otto CM Heart; 2015 Jan; 101(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25502328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How to write a perfect scientific manuscript. Rylski B Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Aug; 48(2):179. PubMed ID: 26069240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]