These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30722986)

  • 21. Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Gingival Displacement Using Three Recent Gingival Retraction Systems -
    Qureshi SM; Anasane NS; Kakade D
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2020; 11(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 33110305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang Y; Fan F; Li X; Zhou Q; He B; Huang X; Huang S; Ma J
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(3):234-244. PubMed ID: 30773575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of Gingival Displacement with Aluminum Chloride and Naphazoline Hydrochloride: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    de Carvalho WF; Junior LCV; Junior HFB; Suguiura TPDS; Previdelli ITS; Sábio S
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 Feb; 29(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 33026719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gingival Retraction Methods: A Systematic Review.
    Tabassum S; Adnan S; Khan FR
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Dec; 26(8):637-643. PubMed ID: 27465933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis.
    Sahu SK; Nagda SJ
    Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2021; 11(3):143-147. PubMed ID: 34458115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of gingival retraction procedures on periodontal indices and crevicular fluid cytokine levels: a pilot study.
    Feng J; Aboyoussef H; Weiner S; Singh S; Jandinski J
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 16650011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative evaluation of the effect of impregnated retraction cord versus laser on gingival attachment level and pain perception following retraction for subgingival margins - A prospective, split-mouth, controlled, clinical study.
    Diwan V; Chauhan MR; Tembhurne J; Gangurde A; Wani H; Danane S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Apr; 24(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 38650338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative evaluation of three noninvasive gingival displacement systems: An
    Thimmappa M; Bhatia M; Somani P; Kumar DRV
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(2):122-130. PubMed ID: 29692565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surgical crown lengthening: a 12-month clinical wound healing study.
    Pontoriero R; Carnevale G
    J Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 72(7):841-8. PubMed ID: 11495130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative evaluation of the amount of gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction systems: An in vivo study.
    Chaudhari J; Prajapati P; Patel J; Sethuraman R; Naveen YG
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2015; 6(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 26097353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of a cordless retraction paste material on implant surfaces: an in vitro study.
    Chang YS; Bennani V; Tawse-Smith A; Girvan L
    Braz Oral Res; 2011; 25(6):492-9. PubMed ID: 22147228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Practice-based preclinical instruction for gingival displacement with animal models.
    Cai H; Yang S; Pei X; Qing H; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):405-409. PubMed ID: 27677218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. To cord or not to cord? That is still a question.
    Veitz-Keenan A; Keenan JR
    Evid Based Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 28338036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inpatient evaluation of periodontal, esthetic and inflammatory parameters around dental implants and natural teeth.
    Güncü GN; Büyüktepe G; Aşkin SB; Kilinç K; Tümer C; Tözüm TF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 23579901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of bleachıng systems on the gingiva and the levels of IL-1β and IL-10 in gingival crevicular fluid.
    Firat E; Ercan E; Gurgan S; Yucel OO; Cakir FY; Berker E
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(6):572-80. PubMed ID: 21913862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical Assessment of Gingival Sulcus Width using Various Gingival Displacement Materials.
    Goutham GB; Jayanti I; Jalaluddin M; Avijeeta A; Ramanna PK; Joy J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 29807958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Impact of Expasyl® Gingival Retraction Paste on the Bond Strength of Self-etch and Total-etch Systems.
    Al Baker AM; El Araby A; Al Amri MD; Sukumaran A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):335-9. PubMed ID: 26162250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Gingival displacement techniques in daily practice. Survey among dental surgeons in Abidjan, Ivory Coast].
    Pesson DM; Bakou OD; Didia EL; Kouame A; Blohoua MR; Djeredou KB
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Dec; 38(152):25-32. PubMed ID: 26939218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Three-dimensional model analysis of the gingival sulcus width from different retraction time].
    Zhang Jj; Liu Yh; Lv Pj; Zhao Yj
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Feb; 43(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 21321624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.