194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30723286)
21. Reversible electropermeabilization of mammalian cells by high-intensity, ultra-short pulses of submicrosecond duration.
Müller KJ; Sukhorukov VL; Zimmermann U
J Membr Biol; 2001 Nov; 184(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 11719852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of electrophoresis in gene electrotransfer.
Pavlin M; Flisar K; Kanduser M
J Membr Biol; 2010 Jul; 236(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 20640850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane.
Pakhomov AG; Gianulis E; Vernier PT; Semenov I; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 Apr; 1848(4):958-66. PubMed ID: 25585279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Correlation between the loss of intracellular molecules and cell viability after cell electroporation.
Jakstys B; Jakutaviciute M; Uzdavinyte D; Satkauskiene I; Satkauskas S
Bioelectrochemistry; 2020 Oct; 135():107550. PubMed ID: 32450281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Demonstration of cell membrane permeabilization to medium-sized molecules caused by a single 10 ns electric pulse.
Silve A; Leray I; Mir LM
Bioelectrochemistry; 2012 Oct; 87():260-4. PubMed ID: 22074790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mechanisms involved in gene electrotransfer using high- and low-voltage pulses--an in vitro study.
Kanduser M; Miklavcic D; Pavlin M
Bioelectrochemistry; 2009 Feb; 74(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 18930698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Evidence of the Bystander Effect after Bleomycin Electrotransfer and Irreversible Electroporation.
Ruzgys P; Barauskaitė N; Novickij V; Novickij J; Šatkauskas S
Molecules; 2021 Oct; 26(19):. PubMed ID: 34641546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intracellular Delivery of Bleomycin by Combined Application of Electroporation and Sonoporation in Vitro.
Tamošiūnas M; Mir LM; Chen WS; Lihachev A; Venslauskas M; Šatkauskas S
J Membr Biol; 2016 Oct; 249(5):677-689. PubMed ID: 27317391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of extracellular medium conductivity on cell response in the context of sub-microsecond range calcium electroporation.
Novickij V; Rembialkowska N; Staigvila G; Kulbacka J
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):3718. PubMed ID: 32111987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Actin networks regulate the cell membrane permeability during electroporation.
Muralidharan A; Rems L; Kreutzer MT; Boukany PE
Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr; 2021 Jan; 1863(1):183468. PubMed ID: 32882211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Investigating relationship between transfection and permeabilization by the electric field and/or the Pluronic® L64 in vitro and in vivo.
Bureau MF; Wasungu L; Jugé L; Scherman D; Rols MP; Mignet N
J Gene Med; 2012 Mar; 14(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 22328073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of the electrochemical effects of pulsed electric fields in a biological cell suspension.
Chafai DE; Mehle A; Tilmatine A; Maouche B; Miklavčič D
Bioelectrochemistry; 2015 Dec; 106(Pt B):249-57. PubMed ID: 26315352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Calcein Release from Cells In Vitro via Reversible and Irreversible Electroporation.
Rajeckaitė V; Jakštys B; Rafanavičius A; Maciulevičius M; Jakutavičiūtė M; Šatkauskas S
J Membr Biol; 2018 Feb; 251(1):119-130. PubMed ID: 29143077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Electropermeabilization by uni- or bipolar nanosecond electric pulses: The impact of extracellular conductivity.
Gianulis EC; Casciola M; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON; Pakhomov AG
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Feb; 119():10-19. PubMed ID: 28865240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Joule heating during solid tissue electroporation.
Pliquett U
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2003 Mar; 41(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 12691444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Theoretical and experimental analysis of electroporated membrane conductance in cell suspension.
Suzuki DO; Ramos A; Ribeiro MC; Cazarolli LH; Silva FR; Leite LD; Marques JL
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Dec; 58(12):3310-8. PubMed ID: 21193368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of electric field induced transmembrane potential on spheroidal cells: theory and experiment.
Valic B; Golzio M; Pavlin M; Schatz A; Faurie C; Gabriel B; Teissié J; Rols MP; Miklavcic D
Eur Biophys J; 2003 Sep; 32(6):519-28. PubMed ID: 12712266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The second phase of bipolar, nanosecond-range electric pulses determines the electroporation efficiency.
Pakhomov AG; Grigoryev S; Semenov I; Casciola M; Jiang C; Xiao S
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Aug; 122():123-133. PubMed ID: 29627664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cancellation effect is present in high-frequency reversible and irreversible electroporation.
Polajžer T; Dermol-Černe J; Reberšek M; O'Connor R; Miklavčič D
Bioelectrochemistry; 2020 Apr; 132():107442. PubMed ID: 31923714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interference targeting of bipolar nanosecond electric pulses for spatially focused electroporation, electrostimulation, and tissue ablation.
Pakhomov AG; Gudvangen E; Xiao S; Semenov I
Bioelectrochemistry; 2021 Oct; 141():107876. PubMed ID: 34171507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
