770 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30723539)
21. Virtual reality-based simulators for spine surgery: a systematic review.
Pfandler M; Lazarovici M; Stefan P; Wucherer P; Weigl M
Spine J; 2017 Sep; 17(9):1352-1363. PubMed ID: 28571789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy.
Moro C; Štromberga Z; Raikos A; Stirling A
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):549-559. PubMed ID: 28419750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting.
Lehmann KS; Ritz JP; Maass H; Cakmak HK; Kuehnapfel UG; Germer CT; Bretthauer G; Buhr HJ
Ann Surg; 2005 Mar; 241(3):442-9. PubMed ID: 15729066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of individual hand performance in box trainers compared to virtual reality trainers.
Madan AK; Frantzides CT; Shervin N; Tebbit CL
Am Surg; 2003 Dec; 69(12):1112-4. PubMed ID: 14700302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validity assessment of a simulation module for robot-assisted thoracic lobectomy.
Whittaker G; Aydin A; Raveendran S; Dar F; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2019 Jan; 27(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 30417680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The added value of virtual reality technology and force feedback for surgical training simulators.
Zhang L; Grosdemouge C; Arikatla VS; Ahn W; Sankaranarayanan G; De S; Jones D; Schwaitzberg S; Cao CG
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():2288-92. PubMed ID: 22317056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Validation of a Novel Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Virtual Reality Module.
Harrison P; Raison N; Abe T; Watkinson W; Dar F; Challacombe B; Van Der Poel H; Khan MS; Dasgupa P; Ahmed K
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):758-766. PubMed ID: 28974429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparative analysis and guide to virtual reality robotic surgical simulators.
Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P; Truong M; Perez M; Smith R
Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 29125206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Serious gaming and virtual reality in the multimodal training of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized crossover study.
Lang F; Willuth E; Haney CM; Felinska EA; Wennberg E; Kowalewski KF; Schmidt MW; Wagner M; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F
Surg Endosc; 2023 Mar; 37(3):2050-2061. PubMed ID: 36289083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Faster acquisition of laparoscopic skills in virtual reality with haptic feedback and 3D vision.
Hagelsteen K; Langegård A; Lantz A; Ekelund M; Anderberg M; Bergenfelz A
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Oct; 26(5):269-277. PubMed ID: 28367667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Development and validation of a surgical training simulator with haptic feedback for learning bone-sawing skill.
Lin Y; Wang X; Wu F; Chen X; Wang C; Shen G
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():122-9. PubMed ID: 24380817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Acquisition of fundamental laparoscopic skills: is a box really as good as a virtual reality trainer?
Vitish-Sharma P; Knowles J; Patel B
Int J Surg; 2011; 9(8):659-61. PubMed ID: 21964217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Virtual Reality Simulator for Pediatric Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair.
Korzeniowski P; Chacon CS; Russell VR; Clarke SA; Bello F
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Nov; 31(11):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 34314635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessment of basic laparoscopic skills on virtual reality simulator or box trainer.
Brinkman WM; Tjiam IM; Buzink SN
Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3584-90. PubMed ID: 23549769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A novel augmented reality simulator for skills assessment in minimal invasive surgery.
Lahanas V; Loukas C; Smailis N; Georgiou E
Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2224-34. PubMed ID: 25303925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Development and Validation of a Novel Robotic Procedure Specific Simulation Platform: Partial Nephrectomy.
Hung AJ; Shah SH; Dalag L; Shin D; Gill IS
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 25801765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Collaborative virtual reality based advanced cardiac life support training simulator using virtual reality principles.
Khanal P; Vankipuram A; Ashby A; Vankipuram M; Gupta A; Drumm-Gurnee D; Josey K; Tinker L; Smith M
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Oct; 51():49-59. PubMed ID: 24732098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Virtual reality in laparoscopic skills training: is haptic feedback replaceable?
Hiemstra E; Terveer EM; Chmarra MK; Dankelman J; Jansen FW
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2011 May; 20(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 21438717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.
Diesen DL; Erhunmwunsee L; Bennett KM; Ben-David K; Yurcisin B; Ceppa EP; Omotosho PA; Perez A; Pryor A
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 21708364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
