387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30723945)
1. Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with a rapid on-site evaluation for gastric subepithelial lesions: A randomized cross-over study.
Osoegawa T; Minoda Y; Ihara E; Komori K; Aso A; Goto A; Itaba S; Ogino H; Nakamura K; Harada N; Makihara K; Tsuruta S; Yamamoto H; Ogawa Y
Dig Endosc; 2019 Jul; 31(4):413-421. PubMed ID: 30723945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Superiority of mucosal incision-assisted biopsy over ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in diagnosing small gastric subepithelial lesions: a propensity score matching analysis.
Minoda Y; Chinen T; Osoegawa T; Itaba S; Haraguchi K; Akiho H; Aso A; Sumida Y; Komori K; Ogino H; Ihara E; Ogawa Y
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):19. PubMed ID: 31964357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Negligible procedure-related dissemination risk of mucosal incision-assisted biopsy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy.
Minoda Y; Ihara E; Itaba S; Sumida Y; Haraguchi K; Aso A; Mizutani T; Osoegawa T; Esaki M; Nagatomo S; Nishioka K; Muta K; Bai X; Ogino H; Fujimori N; Tsurumaru D; Ohuchida K; Qingjiang H; Oki E; Yamamoto H; Ogawa Y
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jan; 37(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 35840712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic and EUS-guided biopsy techniques in subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract: a systematic review.
Verloop CA; Goos JAC; Bruno MJ; Quispel R; van Driel LMJW; Hol L
Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Jun; 99(6):895-911.e13. PubMed ID: 38360118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative diagnostic yield of different endoscopic techniques for tissue sampling of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a network meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Fugazza A; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Colombo M; Ramai D; Mangiavillano B; Chandan S; Gkolfakis P; Mohan B; Hassan C; Repici A
Endoscopy; 2024 Jan; 56(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 37591258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EUS-guided FNA and FNB after on-site cytological evaluation in gastric subepithelial tumors.
Han JP; Lee TH; Hong SJ; Kim HK; Noh HM; Lee YN; Choi HJ
J Dig Dis; 2016 Sep; 17(9):582-587. PubMed ID: 27421815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for gastric subepithelial lesions smaller than 2 cm.
Akahoshi K; Oya M; Koga T; Koga H; Motomura Y; Kubokawa M; Gibo J; Nakamura K
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2014 Dec; 23(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 25531999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endosonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration versus "Key-Hole Biopsy" in the diagnostics of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors. A prospective randomized interventional study.
Zoundjiekpon V; Falt P; Fojtik P; Kundratova E; Mikolajek O; Hanousek M; Reiterova K; Ziak D; Bolek M; Tchibozo A; Kliment M; Urban O
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2020 Mar; 164(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 31025658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized crossover trial comparing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration with EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy for gastric subepithelial tumors.
Iwai T; Kida M; Imaizumi H; Miyazawa S; Okuwaki K; Yamauchi H; Kaneko T; Hasegawa R; Miyata E; Koizumi W
Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Mar; 46(3):228-233. PubMed ID: 29243411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endosonographic large-bore biopsy of gastric subepithelial tumors: a prospective multicenter study.
Eckardt AJ; Adler A; Gomes EM; Jenssen C; Siebert C; Gottschalk U; Koch M; Röcken C; Rösch T
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Oct; 24(10):1135-44. PubMed ID: 22797706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
Sur YK; Kim YC; Kim JK; Lee JH; Yoo BM; Kim YB
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2163-9. PubMed ID: 26491091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using Forceps Biopsy after Small Submucosal Dissection in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.
Jung YS; Lee H; Kim K; Sohn JH; Kim HJ; Park JH
J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Nov; 31(11):1768-1774. PubMed ID: 27709855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling.
Kim GH; Cho YK; Kim EY; Kim HK; Cho JW; Lee TH; Moon JS;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24325591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 19-Gauge Histology Needle Versus a 19-Gauge Standard Needle in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Lesions: A Multicenter Randomized Comparison Study (GREATER Study).
Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Mukai T; Togawa O; Matsubara S; Hatano Y; Hara A; Tanaka M; Shibahara J; Fukayama M; Isayama H; Yasuda I
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Apr; 63(4):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 29464585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High clinical impact and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided biopsy sampling of subepithelial lesions: a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Marschall HU; Nilsson B; Demir A; Lindkvist B; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1304-1313. PubMed ID: 28812151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology versus endoscopic biopsy for the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract: A 10-year retrospective single institution analysis.
Collins K; Yocum BP; Mesa H; Cramer H; Saeed O
Diagn Cytopathol; 2023 Jul; 51(7):434-440. PubMed ID: 37021663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in rapid on-site evaluation for the diagnosis of gastric submucosal tumors: Retrospective analysis of a single-center experience.
Sandoh K; Ishida M; Okano K; Miyasaka C; Mori S; Tokuhara M; Suzuki R; Okazaki T; Nakamura N; Tsuta K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Sep; 47(9):869-875. PubMed ID: 31199571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
